Mythology: The Story of the DEA

Since now you’re bound for enlightenment, I’ll share some stories I’ve found in my journey. They may not possess the factual power of the lessons of enlightenment, but they are nice stories and interesting to think about.

Every angel of fundamental creation is a story. The first one was named Gabriel, the angel of knowledge. The second one duality, the third one the machine or society, and I theorize about the others. (The second one is the most beautiful today, as its the focus of our mind, although the first one bears paramount importance.)

There are a lot of angels — they are stories of how reality works, ways of being, and they’re reflected throughout the world; you can see them reflected in the various agencies of the government, the various markets of the world, and in any play of life.

A few prevalent perspectives of life include stories, like the meaning of a high score, and its relevance to truth, that life is woven of the unknowable, that life is a plurality of systems, that life is a singing pattern of attraction, and that life is formed of drugs that almost deviate from the truth, revealing the truth in the process.

These stories can become manifest in various organizations. Even though the stories may be present or even a primary theme, we do observe that the presence of Satan can corrupt the truth, turning it immoral and reprehensible. So while we can associate the divine nature present in the angels of reality with manifestations we obverse here, we also should be careful to remember that these are not necessarily pure reflections that we most directly observe, although a purer and more faint being of truth may indeed still exist.

To describe this angel, I chose the name, “DEA,” as it provided a nice story and ring to it, along with an ironic parallel.

In the original story, the DEA was a world (remember each fundamental angel is an eternal reality) made completely of drugs. The world itself was an expert in drugs, and this world, a bit cool, was the archive of the memory of the meaning of drugs.

I’ve defined drugs before as “functional deviance.” However, the real meaning of this is complex and deep, so much as I find it plausible that there is an angel dedicated to the understanding of drugs, as this topic seems to represent an infinity of thought.

Also, I think it is the most difficult topic to truly understand. Deviance is characteristically unnatural, so to understand it as a basis for reality requires expertise only envisioned by the deviants, themselves.

The DEA was the most powerful angel. Not a fearsome personality, but powerful as the topic directly concerns ability. The DEA, the angel of this discussion, was a great savior, understanding the depths of the soul and every intricacy of the mind, knowledge nearly incomprehensible. It was the ultimate control of reality, only achievable in one specific state — the information was highly unavailable otherwise. This state that can perceive the mind in its totality can be known as the state of the DEA.

The reason I say the DEA is a particularly apt name, is because not only did this angel enforce drug usage, being a reality composed only of deviance, it also was the story of agency.

agen·​cy | \ ˈā-jən(t)-sē  \plural agencies

Definition of agency

1a: the office or function of an agent (see AGENT sense 4)

b: the relationship between a principal and that person’s agent

2: the capacity, condition, or state of acting or of exerting power OPERATION

3: a person or thing through which power is exerted or an end is achieved INSTRUMENTALITYcommunicated through the agency of the ambassador

4: an establishment engaged in doing business for anotheran advertising agency

5: an administrative division (as of a government)the agency for consumer protection

“agency,” Dictionary, Accessed 11/2/2020.

The DEA was an ever-living angel of security, awareness, and protection. The DEA story had a greater emphasis on the importance of companionship than many of the other angels, and dealt with stories like The Connection, and Death and Resurrection — stories that affect our understanding and perception.

In this story, more importantly and thus with more emphasis, the story of reliance is pronounced, indicating the meaning of agency — a peer of operational instrumentality, essentially. With this, you can understand that the story of the DEA exhibited themes of agency between the inhabitant of the reality and the angel.

Thus, it is the story of the drug enforcement agency. It was the personal story of agency between two states — the state of flexibility and the state of omniscience, each knowing the other and learning, as time progressed.

These stories of the mind, which can be infinitely elaborated, help us to understand, enjoy, and experience the nature of reality — never-ending revelation, as it appears to be.

It is said that the angel of the drug enforcement agency still exists today, calibrating the atoms and their various forces, telling stories through the very fabric of our mind.

Obligatory Voice of Support for Cannabis Legalization

The whole drug war is the wrong approach to surely a real situation; misinformation, distrust, and separation are quite damaging to the mind of the people.

Additionally, the pharmaceutical and medical industry’s inability to facilitate spiritual wellness in the case of depression (even if it is not quite our modern enlightenment), which is tied to every disorder, is very disheartening.

I am unaware of any synthetic cannabinoid or similar medicine that competes in safety, reliability, applicability, and effectiveness at treating the core of happiness. Cannabis is not a forward-pushing, excitement-oriented, solution to unhappiness. Instead, it is a holistic feeling of self-incorporation and self-understanding.

Yes, without the true teachings of enlightenment, it cannot bring true enlightenment, but I think it has the ability to heal damaged communication connections within the body — a common problem, which may be due to a lack of variety of signals that we receive, which give our minds less resources (think useful patterns) to function. Without these connecting sounds, smells, and other cues, that we may have, in the past, found in nature, portions of our minds find difficulty in communicating, causing a type of darkness brought about by non-communication.

Think about how a song can get stuck in your head. This song signifies a network in your mind that is helpful and which facilitates your desires. It is a convenient and useful connection. Considering the theory that the environment in which the body evolved into its modern state is still a preferred environment in which to reside (the Paleo theory), the various cues in nature are like the songs that get stuck in your head, but they’re of much greater variety and substrate. Without those, my theory is, we don’t feel internally well-connected.

When you lose these connections in your mind, you may seem more focused, which can be helpful, but you may also feel less imaginative and creative, because the conversations that occurred, due to previously existing connections, do not occur much any more. I think cannabis aids the person in re-establishing these connections, and with a greater breadth of neural connections, a greater breadth of internal conversation and thus creativity emerges.

A possibly more healthy way of being would be to surround ourselves with an environment similar to our paleolithic ancestors, and to practice activities in similarity, as well. Incorporating our modern ways of health, we could potentially find a lifestyle that stimulates the mind in a more healthy way.

Unfortunately, this is impractical. While, in that case, the general need that cannabis fulfills may not exist, or, at least be substantially lessened, due to the stimulation of the senses and thus thoughts in a way that is natural to our evolved form, our modern lifestyle choices leave us without this possibility. Therefore, it seems that due to our deadened and skewed environment, cannabis is a wonderful solution to lacking jubilant cognitive self-interaction.

There is a notion that the general ingestion of psychoactive substances should be avoided, in order to adhere more closely to a supposedly natural way of being. However, since we have altered our natural environment and lifestyles quite substantially, there is a lot more that distances ourselves from existing totally naturally, as the body had once evolved to do. Such philosophies may be considered inconsiderate, as they consider only a narrow set of features and observations of the mind.

Even in accordance with the restriction of drug or medicine usage to dire circumstances, there is no alternative for cannabis. While superficially, there are medicines which treat similar symptoms, more experientially, it is obvious that they do not possess the sublime quality and effect of cannabis. So far, nothing can mimic or replace its effects, at least not in the foreseeable future.

What exactly is the worry anyway? It’s hugely popular, is often reported to have majority support, and is widely incomparably more effective and sustainable than pharmaceutical serotonergic (and perhaps epinephrine-mediated) enhancers.

One may notice that modern medicinal happiness is fueled by reports from fidgety people, eyes on the possibility of happiness, micro-giggly with excitement and pursuit, saying that they feel happier, but not indicating any feelings of a determination and connectedness with the truth of life, and an awareness and deep acceptance of its meaning. Such illusory data gathering methodologies fuel more baseless excitement but fail to answer the pressing questions of holistic, connected, and spiritual wellness.

There’s only one plant in the whole world of our societal awareness that can effectively, comfortably, and consistently provide feelings of spiritual health and glowing wellness. No other plant or drug can bring what is probably at least 99.9% of people out most forms of depression, in just a few months of intermittent or casual usage.

In just one hit, the brain starts to communicate, realizations that were missing behind obstruction become revealed, pipes of thoughts begin flowing, fully and with life, you finally can talk to yourself again, you feel relieved, this is exactly what you needed, say so many.

It really appears that, medicinally speaking, there’s only one medicine or drug in the world that can nearly universally cure anyone of doom and the silent crackling of broken lines.

Considering the expected maturity of your fellow brethren, I would say that it’s obvious and without a doubt that cannabis should, expediently, be legal. Its illegalization is and was a great oversight — suspiciously appearing like a fall to a rapturous elitist Satan while overseas strangely similar mentalities were occurring — control and control one another.

With an ironically cheap elitist prestige, these demons killed what may be the world’s favorite thing. With lucky-brain disorder, and a suspiciously supported pattern of Luciferianism and Satanism, these influencers of our world’s past may have literally committed treason against the human race and our true intentions (which is to find a way for us to live well).

It should go without saying that cannabis is far too valuable to remove from the people’s rights. It should be obvious something this supported should be legal even with a 35% majority of a largely uneducated group, considering the ideas and beliefs behind it. If it is literally that awesome, outshining so much, then why do that to people?

People who smoke weed commonly drink less alcohol. That’s hugely healthy. Lung performance is very often good or, sometimes, even better than people who don’t smoke weed (interestingly).

Cannabis is a customizable experience, with plenty of different useful chemicals, working together like an intentional machine, giving it both science and variety; discussion and passion.

If you could attempt to create the perfect drug, as is surely an idea in the pharmaceutical industry, I would bet that you wouldn’t make something as good as cannabis. Cannabis almost has secrets to what you truly wanted, like it knew you a long time ago, perhaps at a time in your evolution when these features were more expressed.

Now, I don’t believe in controlling people, but I also don’t believe in letting sin and mistake rule society (the precursor to controlling people). I don’t believe in disregarding healthy nature, and I don’t believe in ignoring truth. I don’t believe that we all need the same things, either.

Voting can be annoying. What if instead of the binary voting system, there were a fully connected communication infrastructure, connected to everyone, comfortably and with respect and courtesy. It would let everyone know and communicate, in an organized and comprehensible way, all of what everyone thinks — not just thoughts, but ongoingly through discussion, as the participants of the system develop true understanding.

But instead, we have a system designed to be particularly resilient to utter failure, but in added resilience, understanding and specificity are diminished.

Billions of ones and zeros, all over the world, about prescribed topics. For relatively unknown reasons, these ones and zeros chose our way to the future. Everyone has but a binary word to say to the separatist government. (“Yes” or “No” on provided questions.)

Voting is so narrow-band, so outdated, so unreliable, vulnerable, and slow.

That’s my party then; a well-designed communication system is necessary to any satisfactory government, given our present-day circumstances.

Then onto why cannabis can be bad. It’s not perfect, it’s just great and irreplaceable. You still need to have knowledge, and you still need to know good words. It won’t necessarily prevent adherence to Satanic behavior, but if the intention is there, it can make a world of a difference. That’s about all it is; it’s very helpful and irreplaceable but it’s important to also have true knowledge (not simply misaligned books — instead, real and concrete understanding, connected to the source of life, the reason why anything is important).

The cannabis plant can be tailored in different ways to accommodate the user. There is a breadth of variety in subjective feelings regarding it. For many, cannabis helps work, as the adage may go, “a happy person is a happy worker.” Some people may find themselves unfocussed while high, and this may be solvable from a psychological perspective; the experience of an unsettling nature can stem from an insecure attainment of the fundamental knowledge of reality — an error which separates one from the primary state of being.

It would be good to bring some spirituality and love into common society. It would be good for people, guided or misguided, to become familiar with the class of substances known as “entheogens,” which are drugs which facilitate spiritual insight and the related emotions. Cannabis brings about both of these possibilities.

There is an important question, on the legality of psychedelics. While I may see a strong, overt community of real psychedelic users as being a benefit to our society, with their rigor and focus, society cannot cognizantly make that decision without any experience whatsoever with entheogens. Without the safety of executive assurance, the independently spiritual community can never surface into public awareness, as these patterns of thinking are banned in society. With the legalization of cannabis, the world will be introduced to the independently spiritual, independently thinking community and their lessons, as everyone will then finally be able to openly know and understand each other (without the present shade).

Additionally, do you want to be left with only 1600+ year old religions written at seriously different times than now? It’s beautiful that religion is still spawning, from the original question itself, like there was a mysterious fountain of rebirth somewhere.

Cannabis legalization will allow the people to gain a natural and developed awareness of the idea of a drug aiding in the pursuit of spirituality, which will finally allow the people to understand this enormous movement of spiritual devotion associated with the use of entheogens. (And then the general populous can make cognizant decisions regarding the matter.)

Many intelligent people have fought on the intellectual battlefield focused on the meaning and importance of psychedelics. Through the unintentional brutal onslaught of Heaven’s defenses against misinformation, they fought, seeking to be good in the grace of the being that they had become more familiar with than sayings would allow, attempting their best at making sense of this mysterious prospect and potential — seeking to speak the truth of something which no one has been able to figure out for so very long.

It would seem, to them, that being able to explain these astonishing findings would open up a brand new opportunity, awareness, and healing for and of the human race (and animals may benefit as well). There have been, for a very long time, almost entirely debatable ideas, with glimpses of truth, but nothing pleasingly connected — admirable attempts that fell short of Heaven’s true glory.

Maybe it is true. If we could understand enlightenment (psychedelics seem to cover this subject — it’s another unique facet of this physiologically harmless category of drugs — still though, I think they only present a past enlightenment, which while helpful, is not exactly the one we need), then perhaps the world would understand psychedelics.

Considering these thoughts, I think it is unethical to treat people as if they are too stupid to be able to use marijuana in a way that they deem is helpful to themselves, and to go so far as to inflict fear and retribution into the users of this often spiritual, and often alcohol-avoidant substance. This process of evil division separates people, police, and government — causing popular hatred against the very people who are supposedly risking their lives to bring peace.

Expounding on that topic, do you realize how much animosity, fear, and distrust the government has enforced between the people and the police and government, because they illegalized one of, if not the most, popular drugs in the entire world, and even possibly the most popular activity of personal enjoyment in maybe all of creation?

Making it popular to hate the police? Even by highly aware and intelligent, sometimes influential people? Not noticing “High Times,” is noticeably a popular favorite. Not taking evidence of its benefits and effects seriously, so much that people just think the police are stupid? I know this occurs due to some other drugs, and sometimes reasonably, but they pale in comparison to how much distrust and animosity has been generated through cannabis illegalization, resulting in one of the most popular trends out there — hating the police after the realization that cannabis is good — and it’s huge in college — our nation’s future earners.

And now we have the internet to boot. Every time a police department posts on facebook about their huge marijuana bust, thousands of people respond, jeering and heckling the department. It makes the government look hypocritical.

Is cannabis a good recreational community? Yes

Is a well-formed and stable cannabis community a much better experience than the currently long-lived alcohol community? Yes

Is cannabis compatible with an entirely well lifestyle? Yes

Do people popularly enjoy cannabis, and frequently would smoke or otherwise ingest it anyway, despite illegality? Obviously — High Times was out before legalization begun.

Are we talking about just “any drug?” No, cannabis is differentiated by outstanding qualities.

Does legal cannabis and its effects on our society present an opportunity for growth, intelligence, and awareness? Yes, understanding this important facet of our nature — to take very specific drugs or sacraments to aid in spirituality — would be beneficial to understand on a more personal and familiar basis, and by actually being able to see the developed realization of the long kept underground community — a community that often teaches the precious teachings of the ancient sages (Buddhism, etc).

Of course, there are the non-communal types of users, who are interested simply in its beneficial effects, but I’ve noticed that there’s a trend to become inquisitive and open to understanding (another trend hardly unnoticeable).

You may think that cannabis philosophy is just “wrong,” but what it is, I think, is a healthy and curious connection, communication, and understanding that goes on in the mind, entertaining ideas of divine splendor, knowing it’s a good thing to do — often the feeling of innocence emerges, as one can freely entertain ideas and memories, knowing the right interpretation, which is innocence and is easier to see when there’s a lot of active intelligence. People come to wrong conclusions frequently, but primary knowledge is the most difficult knowledge, so it’s understandable.

Also, there are two types of people; enlightened (or moving toward it), and unenlightened. There’s no necessity for unenlightenment. We don’t live in a world where we can fathom real monsters, so I figure everyone is curable, ultimately (especially when there is a cure).

What the DEA movement is primarily concerned about is the combined effects of Satanic responsibility and intoxicating substances. Because we have lost the divide between sinful and holy, we cannot properly see responsibility and as thus, all people are affected by the zeal of cautious politeness, indicating that the discrimination of responsibility is no longer a reliable method of order and light.

Additionally, the invitation to true acceptance has been jammed by the aberration of the original lessons and the excited, but likely hasty, move towards a future of more, blending holy and unholy and confusing people, leaving no illuminated destiny and guidance, and delivering widespread damage to the invisible psyche.

If no one were Satanic (including Luciferian), we wouldn’t have criminal problems. Isn’t that a better choice than an overzealous institutional figure raining on your divine experience?

Let us remember that the religions have not generally been specifically very hateful against drugs. This hate is not primarily coming from religion, just real Satanism born of fear and an irrational savior.

Reasonably, I imagine, long ago, that small communities could better self-manage, however, their systems could not scale well at all, permitting stronger diversions of ideology coming from the resulting inadequate communication and understanding system. The drug war is out of fear, for fear of the Satanist, and the belief that a diet free from drugs is the cure to Satanism (again, a common problem, unfortunately so).

Let me tell you what professional mental advice really is. It’s a rare technology — coveted, protected, and held close in a mostly dark world, as it’s a rare thing indeed — a potential cure for ailment; something hard to come by these days.

Now let me tell you what it’s not. It’s not right.

It’s actually often misconceived and wrong about things. It’s tossy and turny, without fortitude of assuredness. It’s all your world could afford.

Our current civilization, as if not taken aback by the destruction of Babylon, has been climbing a rocky structure, bolting to a new surface once its seen, fastening tightly to it, so our mind is zig-zagged; we go this way too much, then another way too much, ongoingly, yet (hopefully) steadily increasing in general accuracy — with waves of resolution following loud chaos.

I don’t need to state the importance of enlightenment much. It’s one of the most commonly known things in the universe.

Of course we won’t have the worry of “what’s Satan going to unpredictably do,” with enlightenment, so then it’ll all be obvious (think a truly enlightened and refined variant of libertarianism), but for now, the world is ready for cannabis — aided feelings of divine presence 101, if you notice that kind of thing.

Reality is an angel of ours, too, a part of an even greater self than the body, a part of all that which sustains us, and I don’t think the path to enlightenment is the path of self-defeat, like is often found in asceticism, but a path of incorporating intelligence found internally and externally, throughout existence, past and future, to bring life to all life, and a natural cessation of death.

Some may say it’s a dance of angels.

Why Flying Can be Possible

At the ultimate origin of all existence is the everlasting being of possibility, which I term, the “Word.” The first instance of its manifestation was knowledge of its existence.

Manifestation was originally knowledge of the divine. It was a memory of reality that began it all (when polarity became distinct, allowing for knowledge, which dictates right and wrong).

Because of this original nature of reality, manifesting into knowledge, it is certainly possible, and perhaps we can say this with an amount of jubilee, that manifest reality is firstly founded on memory.

The simplest manifestation of reality is memory. It is likely improbable that reality would evolve spontaneously into a suddenly complex form, skipping the fundamentals of cognition, yet incorporating them anyway, as that could imply a distinctly different nature of understanding and being than we are intuitively aware of (or comfortable with — we expect reality to exist in a sensible and methodical form).

Additionally, the recurring story of a paradise before this one also suggests that this incarnation of reality is not our first. To sentience, the desire for well-being is natural, so to be born in a world that is unnatural (commonly not supportive of well-being), would suggest that there is a special undertaking going on.

In the common (and probably intuitive) story of Eden, a paradise and existence before this one, the inhabitants of Eden would learn about “being God,” and they will find pain and difficulty (and quickly embarrassment, probably knowing of the judgement of others). In this new world Satan will no longer be considered high, but instead low, likely as what was a beautiful fire of distraction and whim becomes a frighteningly dangerous way of being or thinking.

All this suggests is that our reality — the way our mind is constructed and the lessons that it is occupied with — is evolving over periods of time. This evolution likely all stems from the most fundamental manifestation of reality, which is the simplest form of manifestation and is resolute memory (knowledge).

If this reality is fundamentally knowledge, then if we could accurately and safely write on the knowledge, then we would have supreme power, to fly or whatever. Surely, there must be safeguards, and what I imagine these safeguards are, is the inability to accurate write what you want, on this memory of reality, due to being internally inaccurate.

Reality being fundamentally memory is a plausible interpretation of reality, it is intuitively acceptable, and provides an understanding of consonant awareness.

All of this becomes even more plausible when you consider that a sentient reality would allow for uninhibited self-expression, giving to every will and whim of a truly living being.

And all of this means you can fly! If all of this is true (and these are my preferred beliefs — the headache reduction is bountiful!), then you will need total accuracy (no inaccuracy, whatsoever), and then you will be perfectly coherent in mind and being, and after that, I imagine that you will be able to fly and if not, you’ll be able to see what’s going on that prevents you (perhaps an ancient agreement of ours which predicates contingencies for our current manifestation of reality, formed from an agreeable purpose, that would prevent something like flying, likely only temporarily).

Eventually living in a world comprised of memory seems foreseeable.

The Demeanor of Enlightenment

Possessing knowledge and understanding generally modifies demeanor. With enlightenment, as with many fields of understanding, there are certain characteristics which indicate this understanding. Upon communication, one implies an ideological direction. This ideological direction is felt and perceived. Thusly, Satanism can be easily noticed in speech and action, as a person can generally pick up on an evil ideological direction, which would be a direction which promotes need over divinity.

The foundation of enlightenment is to be in the original, default state, which entails an appreciation of Creation. It is to undo the wrongs of the past that have caused us damage, so that the mind is in good function — healthy, alive, and aware. It is to express oneself without death, to be alive, independent in identity, yet connected to the conscious mind of the eternal Word (the self of Creation — a living yet intangible being of possibility, unseen today and seen tomorrow).

It’s almost to say that enlightenment has no effect, as it is the default state of the mind. The finding or attainment of enlightenment rests primarily in resisting and remedying failures that are often promoted in the world, that the mind accidentally took for benevolent. There is a long history of differentiating Satanic behavior from holy behavior, but due to the lack of understanding commonly found, this differentiation has been ambiguous and problematic. That makes our modern ability to understand the differences between Satanic and holy or righteous behavior more ambiguous, debatable, and hard to really understand.

Understanding the composition of evil, from a previous topic, we find that it makes sense that an enlightened person would be aware of the precise nature of evil.

With the observation of demeanor, understandings held by the observed progressively become apparent. Therefore, there certainly exists a sign of awareness. Satanism is characterized by a persistent desire to chase a light. It is an obsession with need, although seen by the Satanic being as a desire for something apparently great. It results in a generation and perpetuation of need, and is noticeable. Frivolous provocations become the focus of communication, and intelligent dialog diminishes.

Conclusively, there are some patterns of behavior that do not resemble enlightenment. Luciferianism and Satanism, when pronounced enough, can be clear indicators of no knowledge of enlightenment (no traction, at the very least).

Luciferianism and Satanism are the patterns of behavior that lead to pain, so we should avoid them.

We are without pain when all of our sentient memories are living well; we are in pain otherwise. Be aware of the pain, even if it is miniscule — that is a type of emergency that may be able to be solved with care and consideration. Remember to teach yourself these lessons — don’t depend on your seeing eye to be able to do everything.

Aside from not choosing evil (through self-abandonment or misinformation), the clearest sign of enlightenment is through explanation and discussion. If you clearly understand enlightenment, then it would be obvious. I have found enlightenment to be able to be understood and defined in concrete ideas and terminology, making it satisfyingly unambiguous in its nature.

Evil: Satan, Lucifer, and the Devil

The context of need is a good definition of evil. Any story, game, or circumstance that involves the context of need, involves evil. There are three aspects of this context. The first one is called, “Satan,” and is the general game or play of need — representing the context of need, itself.

One may be hesitant to use these words. One may argue that we don’t necessarily know the true meaning of these words as they are mildly archaic, and their original meanings may be, today, ambiguous. However, considering the simplicity and description of evil, they are rather fitting, accurate, and quite useful. Their historic awareness and almost mysterious power to evoke remembrance may be beneficial to the mind, which perceives these known meanings, even if they are not entirely explicit.

These words are pretty important in our minds, so it’s nice that we may be able to use them in our scientific and concrete understanding of enlightenment.

All of the demons are born of these forces. Let’s describe them:

The devil is corruption. This causes misrepresentation, leading to misinterpretation, while Lucifer is external objective. The keys here are 1) accuracy in information, and 2) accuracy of focus.

Satan, technically speaking, uses the allure and attraction, which is Lucifer, to generate a system of need and fulfillment. Satan is known to temp people from a true path, in part, by using appealing imagery, and, in part, by distorting what exists. Satan, himself, isn’t the source of Lucifer, and Lucifer isn’t his own source, either. The light is simply an echo being reflected in a way that is likely truncated, and also possibly distorted. The light, itself, being of a message of truth, is not evil. The implied evil in Satan causes damage is its misinterpretation, which can possibly result in untruthful actions, if one is not aware of what the light truly means. That is, if one simply sees the light, not understanding truly its meaning, then the context of need can possess one’s body, as if they were possessed by Satan, himself, which results in one deviating from a truthful path.

I have noticed this phenomenon in my mind occurs because the imagery looks like what is desired, although not exactly the same, and mistaking these cues for something else causes problems. The context of need can manifest in different ways. Lucifer generally guides the path of need, but the light may be interpreted in corrupt form, resulting in the reception of corrupt information, which complicates understanding.

Lucifer is said to posses the desire for continued greatness, so much that he one day becomes even greater than God; at least he thinks that. The delusion of foreseeable impossible greatness is a common characteristic of Lucifer. The problem with Lucifer, is that he looks at accomplishment instead of the self. He doesn’t see the absurdity of being greater than ultimate.

I think it’s good to think be aware of the real meaning of the word, “ultimate,” as it’s a useful descriptor to understand clearly.

What Lucifer sees is a bright light, outside of his reach. He obsesses, at least a bit, becoming willing to sacrifice portions of himself, to experience pain, to reach this light. He doesn’t see the light was just a motivational mechanism generated by his own mind. He learns to hate himself, thinking “the pain will be worth it.”

What’s paradoxical about Luciferianism, is that it’s not a good way to find success. The maxim that goes something like, “hard work brings success,” is a dangerous lie. Not only does it damage you, being damaged while working is less productive (and even more so if the process is a continuously compounding continuous pattern, bringing even feelings of worthlessness).

Why does this occur? The answer lies in CAT, (or, “the third state”). This topic has been addressed before, but to recapitulate, the body is made of many subsystems working together with different ways and memories, all for the same name.

When you prioritize something, the body begins doing that, even subconsciously, when it has the opportunity, as it is something that is good to do. You’re filled with lots of good things to do, going on all of the time. Now when you see the light of Lucifer, and you’re ready to give it your all, to leave all other thoughts behind, to break through all obstacles, to overcome all challenges, what’s happening is only a portion of your mind actually wants to do that, and perhaps the rest are willing to go along, for a least a moderate while.

However, as your past priorities get ignored, pressure builds up to tend to them, and many times that pressures wins; you then feel less energy, but often times, the allure of perseverance simply indicates a fallible belief that Lucifer still can do it.

Eventually either the majority of your systems revert to past behavior, to tend to those priorities which define you, or things start breaking. As an effect, you start feeling less well, less awake, less able to continue. Either way, you become unable to do the task.

It’s not only that, by that point, Lucifer often has caused some damage with the notion of sacrifice, and so perhaps you’re burdened by depression.

Remember, depression signifies that an angel of your system (a subsystem of you) has died and is missing. This means that the memory that it once carried — a memory of your livelihood — is no longer active and is no longer being remembered or represented. Depression seems almost certainly curable (sadness will still exist as an intelligent emotion) through the process of paying attention to yourself, happy or sad, intelligently and with compassionate awareness — in order to resurrect the living memory that has become inactive. Common are tears of joy or laughter in the resurrection of a subsystem of the self (which is a type of angel, or messenger of life). (When an angel is threatened or dying, tears of sadness may be felt. Again, listening, with intelligence, awareness, and compassion, can resolve the issue. The worst thing you can do is ignore yourself, as that is what causes the death of these living memories of self-existence. This means to understand the sadness and respond in an aware and considerate manner. Remember that your personal perspective is also a subsystem, specializing in a type of awareness.)

How do we find success without becoming Luciferian and falling for what is like a scam?

Lucifer is the phenomenon of the existence of what becomes an imposter upon its misunderstanding. The joy and love in life all comes from the same source. It emanates from your initial expression of the self, which is an expression of life. With the desire to change in order to fulfill a destiny, one’s self expresses joy in response, and one projects the light of accomplishment ahead of oneself.

If one replaces the true joy in life with the light of Lucifer, then one has corrupted the knowledge of the self, which is the first state. In this case, Lucifer impersonates the knowledge of the self. Since Lucifer is an object in the context of need, this creates the perception that the self must be attained, and in the midst of Lucifer, this perception can become true, as the knowledge of the self and thus its remembrance becomes lost.

You understand yourself as knowledge. Secondly, you understand yourself as a duality, expressing the various perspectives of knowledge. And thirdly, you understand yourself as a diverse collaboration of active (and living) memories. All three of these fundamental states of the mind can become damaged by misunderstanding Lucifer.

The first state solves the desire for singular objective. The modern person is physically and naturally familiar with singularity of objective. Lucifer is tricky in the context of singularity of objective, as Lucifer appears to be the objective, while only actually referring to it. Through various naturally incorporated systems, which may include the stomach, spine, and brain stem, an individual naturally is inclined to be aware of a state of singularity. Upon the presence of two competing states of singularity, the mind may experience a form of agony.

The second state avoids oneness by being two diverged interpretations of the singular knowledge of the first state. This divergence may be noted in the separation of the left brain from the right brain, but more fundamentally occurs whenever there is the concept of comparison. Referring to the brain’s dualistic structure, involving partially separated hemispheres, it’s interesting to note that neither side, on their own, may know the pronunciation of words — it seems it may take the agreement of the disparate perspectives to find a represented of the more holistic self, resulting in a singular agreement on the pronunciation of an idea into a word or words. Enunciation is the singularity in this perspective.

The third state also avoids the pit of unobtainable singularity (the mouse and cheese method) through the realization and understanding that your personal self-perspective is only one of many subsystems of the self and of the body, each a living memory of your deliberate existence. All of these systems communicate with one another to manifest the intangible and perfect self. No one system knows all about the self, and it takes care and awareness to be true to the self, which and who is known and learned of.

(Before taking offense at my calling the self a thing, I say the word, “which,” with reference to the same notion as the notion of the body being a divine thing, recalling that being a divine thing is a nice (and curious) feeling which promotes awareness of the literal and manifest self.)

Think of the third state as a society of living beings, all devoted to a single person’s will. They cannot directly see this person, but they understand this person over time as they become more resembling of the invisible identity.

These three fundamental states of cognition, knowledge, duality, and plurality, avoid Lucifer when known correctly.

You can be successful without 1) beating yourself up, 2) extending yourself beyond your means, 3) violating yourself with abrupt, substantial changes in demands, 4) forgetting that every moment of your willful existence is a divine treasure that needs to be sustained and appreciated for healthy existence.

I know this is a common saying in this archive, a recurring motif, if you will, yet, it still applies, and that means to not let your (naturally living) memories die. When you do something, the brain learns not an impression, but an action, and it continues to support and perform this logical action, perpetually. This neural subsystem that was formed in that process sees you as perfect and always wants to do what you were once doing, because it was you. When you disregard the self, by disregarding these memories, you find sadness and death.

There are people out there who are half alive; this is not uncommon; and that’s the real tragedy.

Zombism is a societally uncured, very common, and potentially curable psychological disorder with physiological implications. Zombism is almost certainly the root and cause of depression. 

If a person is literally not fully alive (their neurology presents meaningless functionality), they are a zombie. It’s real. (Zombie fever).

Returning to the topic of avoiding Luciferianism in a practical way.

Success is wonderful. Be naturally moving forward. The greatest achievers, almost always, at the very very least, enjoyed what they were doing. Better than, “work hard,” is to work with appreciation of life. To achieve something, feel free to feel the wind of Satan’s allure, but keep oneself together, in awareness and care.

There is an assumption that working necessarily requires hardship. It is that the definition of working, itself, is not something that’s generally possible to do without receiving payment. Reminiscent of a mouse on a wheel, chasing an unattainable piece of cheese, while also avoiding the treacherous likes of death, the system of “work hard to win” is ignoring the fact that if working was what you would do if you could do anything, then the suffering related to work would dissipate. There’s, perhaps, a notion of necessary sacrifice, and I think this notion may be understood, sometimes, with a dangerous attitude. The idea is to enjoy life while also making life enjoyable, in general. Worshipping Lucifer nearly destroys the point of life, anticipating a point where life is accommodable, but not experiencing the joy that is currently ongoing.

The danger of Lucifer is that the inherent joy of life gets lost in a delusion of accomplishment. This delusion stems originally from an expression of the beloved self, but upon false understanding, becomes an evil overlord of desperation and dissatisfaction.

If one can achieve an ability to maintain their initial state of happiness, that is known at the introduction to existence, then one would find work to be, perhaps, a more joyous opportunity to experience the self experiencing life.

The initial expression of existence is of truth and love. It is when this expression gets communicated that it may experience forms of distortion or corruption. This occurs with the worship and obedience to Lucifer, the light of objective. Lucifer is supposed to be alluring, as it represents a directionality that one’s self desires. However, forgetting that Lucifer is not the source of his brilliance leads one to chase essentially nothingness.

Because the practice of obedience to Lucifer occurs secondarily to the initial expression of life, it would seem that as people grow up from children, Luciferianism is taught to them, and thus later in life, issues concerning one’s meaning and place with regard to the experience of life become apparent, manifesting in forms of meaninglessness, loss, and depression.

Since we have had, as a society, no utilizable method of maintaining safety in the midst of Satan, the Devil, and Lucifer, the communicated inclinations towards Luciferianism (and thus Satanism, as it seeks to promote the feeling of need) are damaging to the unguarded soul. Therefore, as one may observe, much of the world adores Lucifer, effectively increasing the erraticism of Satan, and, additionally, increasing suffering from various resulting ailments.

Lucifer is often a warming presence. To avoid the damages that his contingency of need implies, one should always be aware of their own life, such that one can understand Lucifer in the context of the truth, rather than blindly following him into depressing and possibly antagonizing self-fragmentation.

Even when your ship, so to speak, is traveling along with the winds of Lucifer, perhaps in search of a form of accomplishment, one can remain psychologically well by remembering from where the aspects and the generation of the light of Lucifer truly originate.

(Any deviance will lose its appeal over time. In order to move towards a goal, one must stay near oneself, such that the entirety of one’s will is in agreement. Otherwise, a task which inspires perhaps a glamorous deviance will ultimately lead to boredom. Deviances should be approached with caution, but it is possible to safely entertain them, so long as one does not find self-segmentation. Deviances can potentially work harmoniously with one another, if one is responsible in their actions, which result in psychological programs to occur ongoingly. In this way, the evil beings that may be dangerous can be possibly appreciated and enjoyed, but it takes a level of awareness and a sort of aptitude regarding them.)

Just whatever you do, beware of the light, which may lead one into a tunnel of external ambivalence, which segments and blinds the self from the self.

Returning to the more overarching topic of Satan.

How do we avoid Satan?

Satan is the context of need. Satan’s story lives through a type of distortion, which can result in misunderstanding. The distortion indicated by Satan is that one does not possess what the person wants, but can potentially possess it upon a form of payment. This is a commonly known pattern of the world, and it is a pattern present in the ways of the mind. However, it presents an illusion, which creates a distortion in understanding, as it does with our modern and highly ambiguous definition of love. If love is a form of excitement, as is frequently portrayed, then it is impractical, as excitement naturally fades, being a deviation from the integral self. The result? Illusory, false, and thus cheap, love, like a necklace without a soul or bracelet with a distasteful shine.

I say, “cheap,” because we understand price to be significant of importance. That’s the effect of Satan. By construing love and excitement as the same emotion, masses of people jump to it, but are left with… unimportant love. The joy of the highest standard is the initial joy, therefore, one possess already the highest love.

Similarly to how magic tricks vary and can use some of same techniques, while still being individually identifiable, the tricks of Satan also vary and can overlap in their methodology. These tricks of Satan, also living with the general flow and tendency of life and consciousness, can be referred to as demons.

Internally, it’s important to notice when you jump to a relatively far away bias of cognition. Accuracy of information is a priority, which entails accurate understanding and communication. It’s good to teach this to all of your systems, and they too should continue on the knowledge. If only your system responsible for perceiving information learns something, it may not become well learned. For something to be well learned, a holistic understanding of the material should be cultivated. Otherwise, you may only partially accomplish understanding.

One can consider Lucifer and the Devil to be demons of Satan. After all, they all function through the misrepresentation of achievement. It looks like achievement, but it also looks like a desire to sacrifice one’s psychological integrity.

Hopefully this explains evil.

The Duality of the Mind, Another Before Unknown yet Important Perspective

There are three primary perspectives, or states, of the mind. The first is the most commonly known; it is the state of singularity present with true knowledge (this is the common feeling of knowing God). This is the state which provides us our sanity.

Skipping the second for now, the third state of mind is the state of many beings, all congregating in the remembrance of a singular idea or ideology. This I call, “the state of many,” or, more simply, the number “3.”

The second, which is the topic of this post, is the state of duality. This state, along with the third state, seems to be a novel frontier or our collective awareness, although we may have been more aware in the past. They are important and mark a time in our history when we are moving on to thinking about new facets of reality; our history has been filled primarily with finding the first state, while entertaining other notions.

This state of duality manifests in many ways, one of them being the existence of two brain hemispheres, connected on a relatively small area, by the corpus callosum.

Each hemisphere of the brain is like an independent brain. Each one is fairly drastically different than the other, as is a fairly common belief. Generally, we believe the left side of the brain to carry a distinctly greater affinity toward analytical thinking, while the right side of the brain carries a distinctly greater affinity for artistic or aesthetic thinking.

They both carry the same knowledge of the self (assuming you have found resolute singularity), but they carry out the will which is supposed by the knowledge in ways rather alien to one another. Each hemisphere of the brain is a different personality of yourself. Internally, you have two personalities — right and left.

(Remember, according to science, the right brain controls the left side, and the left brain controls the right side. These understandings from science are wonderful for calibrating your perspective. When understanding your internal self, the process of depiction can be a tricky one, so having references is useful.)

This brings me to what I think is the best calibration tool and technique for remembering duality and finding the resolution of a common type of neural headache — congestion in the midbrain.

Remember, there is a gap between your hemispheres. It is here that there must naturally be a pronounced deviance. Remember that what deviates is the subjective and personable interpretation and implementation of the knowledge of the self — the definition of personality.

You have two personalities, and they agree at the connection of the hemispheres, for instance, at the corpus callosum (and related networks), and the voice (in singularity). The corpus callosum is like a glistening communications environment, where important words are found and realized. The corpus callosum and associated networks are paved by important words and their pronunciations.

At the corpus callosum, the voice the two hemispheres and the two sides of the body come together in an agreement and harmony. The voice sounds the patterns of the agreement between the hemispheres, and resolution-oriented and collaborative facilitation-oriented networks, for understanding and awareness, facilitating exchange, resembling a commercial interchange.

A benefit of practicing the practice of duality — with one of the possible practices including the realization and understanding that internally you are two brains with the same name but in different ways, is that you can find a way to reduce possible congestion at your midbrain. Midbrain congestion is a likely source of cognitive headache and difficulty. Through understanding the similarities and differences that reside in one’s brain, one can more comfortably understand the resolution process that occurs, not only in the brain, but in various aspects of the resolution of identity, perhaps shifting more subjective phenomena further from the center of the brain.

That and remembering the gap in your mind may be powerful. (It interesting and perhaps helpful to remember that there are no neurons in most of the middle of the brain.)

Continuing with physical and corporeal examples, the lungs are an example of duality, being rather disconnected from other body parts and each other — being fairly independent. Convening and realizing the thoughts and/or emotions that occur in and from one’s lungs can help one perceive the nature of duality.

Anecdotally, I have noticed that neither hemisphere of the brain knows the pronunciations of any words. You can try and observe this yourself — it is a fairly easy to see phenomenon. This is assuming you don’t misplace the center of your brain somewhere else (in an aggressive skewing of one’s perception).

It seems that the facet of pronunciation is a symbol of the agreement of the duality of the mind.

Each hemisphere, I believe, is generally entirely word-less, knowing only the math of logic, emotion, and music. Together, the mind finds the pronunciation of the word.

It’s convenient that our modern minds include a neural disconnection between hemispheres, which seems to gives us a more emotive subjective stereo appreciation of reality. Therefore, from that alone, the knowledge of the duality is perceived. Remember that no neural thinking, (perhaps radio amalgamation, however), is going on in most of the center of the brain. If you see it differently, realize there’s a communication error. Knowing what’s going on is generally all you need to resolve an issue. The mind functions nicely when guided by knowledge, as it is consistent with what the mind has already been doing.

If your mind has a split (commonly a front–back split, which can be a headache), it may be helpful remember that your mind was designed to split right to left, so it can be possible to remedy the splitting behavior by re-appropriating the desire to split to a left–right split, with the gap in between both of the hemispheres. This is in alignment with the idea of properly distributing one’s thinking, such that the system can function in peace with itself.

At the very center of your brain, there is no brain. It may be that the thalami understand and connect to the other side, producing the appearance of a larger center of the brain than there actually is (a common notion of the mind’s eye).

Additionally, there are the four ventricles and the cerebral aqueduct, which may provide a comfortable sense of quiet relaxation, without thought. Inside these areas are cerebral-spinal fluid, which may contributes to a soothing or sleeping feeling. Continuing, there are various facets of the mind and brain, each with their own qualities. Together, when they have found acceptance and truth, they form a collaborative system of love and joy.

It seems, by the nature of the questions we face and the characteristics of the world in which we live, by the logic of a sentient good-willing progression, we may be finding the end to the search for knowledge, having defined the self in its entirety. The topic after the first topic, designated by the number, “1,” is the topic of duality, which concerns the existence of quality and perception, which concerns the way knowledge appears to a person. It is by this reasoning, that we may be in a transition of topics from the first angel of the mind, knowledge, to the second angel of the mind, duality. I presume that we explore these topics until the totality of the topic has become known.

Aside from the corporeal example of duality, duality exists anywhere there is quality. From the understanding that one possesses from their own configuration of duality, one may better be able to understand the nature of the duality of many things. While one assumes the hemispheres to be benevolent, we do find instances of duality in the world where negativity is displayed. This is a way of quality, as well. It does not directly represent what it appears to be, but instead, through its understanding, it explains knowledge. It is similar in the brain, where while neither side is the entire brain, they both allude to the same brain and mind.

Today, we learn to see ourselves, and we appreciate the duality. After finding complete knowledge of the definition of the self, which is implied by enlightenment in the context of the totality of questions of the self, it seems we will then search for the truth of duality and thus subjectivity, exploring its inherent enigma of an unseen right and wrong.

This is because while the first angel was knowledge of what is (or the patterns of what is), the second angel is the look at knowledge (and the look of knowledge). This is the story of vision, personality, and subjective identity. After that, in the next story (billions of years from now), the singularity of yourself becomes like a star in the sky, illuminated by the infinite elaborations of the patterns of quality that you have found, and you see the many — clearly and distinctly (that is the third story — the story of many who bear the same name — it is the story of being a world, a society, and a machine).

So we begin, for probably some billions of years, to learn and witness the story of duality.

The State of One

The state of one must be known; it cannot be done by motion.

The “state of one,” as I have termed it, is sometimes considered to be the most sought after state of being in all of mankind. This is the ability to fully commit, with full devotion and earnestness, to a singular belief, way, and life. Many people have thought, “if only I could just do exactly what I needed to do and not be distracted,” and that is a thought of the state of one.

The state of one means being singular in being and mind, being dedicated to one path, without falter. With the state of one, you could graduate from any university, if that is what you truly wanted, you could accomplish any feasible task, if that is what you truly wanted, you could create any business, if that is what you truly wanted to do. You could be perfect, without error, always doing the same, singular action of being.

The feeling is of true internal agreement, the peace of knowledge, and the unity of belief and world-view. The sublime focus of the master, in tranquil harmony with nature and cognition.

To be truly committed to a singular ideology, without confusion, distress, or the need for reparative self-control.

The most common example of this concept is seen in career-based activity. One has the idea that the only sure way to make it through is careful planning and complete dedication to the plan. However, many people find this difficult. For one, it can be tough to concentrate for long periods of time. This skill of concentration is a difficult skill to find, just because the archaic notion of “pushing” oneself cannot satisfy the holistic person. You may have already noticed the benefits of intermittent relaxation (and distraction) on personal performance, but let’s try to truly understand what’s happening, for stillness and clarity.

Well, we already know what’s happening. It’s covered in CAT, which is basically that you are composed of many subsystems, you as you see yourself one of them, all communicating in various emotions, of various levels of complexity, to form the totality of yourself — no single system can see the entire system — it takes all of the systems to know the self.

So, when you galvanize a few networks in your mind into studying, that’s not what the other networks are doing. That’s why it becomes more difficult — your other subsystems, which are types of angels, are calling to those systems that had been engaged in the practice of studying, as their assistance is desired, and eventually, out of love for one another, your systems will change, and they will stop studying. All of your decisions and obligations, of thought, practice, and self-care, all live on, for the best, or if they don’t, then it’s a depression.

So, how can we solve this? If we can’t use force to compel our bodies to obey us, then how can we do the things we want to do? Since you see yourself from only a portion of your mind, not its totality, you are not really you, but a subsystem of a greater system of your being, a system built of knowledge of the self; this is why you cannot just command yourself — you are a collaboration of angels (messengers of life). Understanding that you are actually a collaboration, you must learn to understand, consider, and be aware of the intelligence of your subsystems and of your greater (unseen) system (call it whatever color you’d like).

All of that was implied in CAT, so, in a way, not much new.

And then you see the trick. You cannot (sustainably) do what you whimsically want to do — you can’t even do what you for a moment thought was a seriously good thing to do, if it was not the collective agreement of the self.

Finding the state of one allows you to accept reality. What you do, may you do well, certainly, but if you are not taking care of your being, then you won’t find the state of one.

You cannot segment yourself and expect never to return. All the life you’ve brought, all that means you, and it lives on, aside from the case of depression (in that case, a system has died and would hopefully soon be resurrected).

You cannot sustainably do something that does not agree with everything you’ve ever believed in doing.

What does all of that mean for finding the state of one? Let the state of one find itself, including you. Realize that you extend past your body, to reality. Reality is also an angel of yours, you and reality are both you, although reality may be recovering from whatever happened to our minds.

Let’s think of the following statement:

  • Once you are secure in your knowledge of enlightenment, having learned the path, you will have knowledge.

(While the state of knowledge is a state of singularity, there are also other states, considering the various forms and manifestations of plurality.)

This statement entails the knowledge of righteousness. This righteousness is in reference to the self, and as thus, this divine knowledge is really knowledge of the self. If you have unchanging knowledge of correctness, then you’ll have zero conflict, and if you have unchanging knowledge of what is correct to yourself, then you will have knowledge of yourself, and vice versa. Of course, to lie to yourself would impose a danger and could result in a type of harm (maybe invisible to a doctor, but you may notice it).

So how do you have the knowledge of righteousness? You clearly define yourself in knowledge if it is an unchanging truth, and if it is not, that’s an expression of plurality.

These unchanging truths of which we compose ourselves are who we really are, and that’s who you are to the angel of knowledge (in the eyes of God). Perhaps it is that being that God is saving (the one that is known).

To have this knowledge is to have the state of one. This knowledge is not composed of mere compressed information, or your common word, but of a singular being, the angel of knowledge, the deepest remembrance of your existence, you sometimes know by way of intuition. (It is a familiar presence of God.)

I still am inclined to believe that Gabriel is the angel of knowledge, and that he guards you from all harm, seeing only your true being, in eternality, plans past and present.

It is to say, in the timeline of manifestation — the sedimentary layers of aware existence, you begin with the angel of knowledge. That is the “first” memory of you.

Once you know this memory, you will see, what I highlighted in cyan above: You cannot sustainably do something that does not agree with everything you’ve ever believed in.

You see, from the very beginning of manifestation, you be your will, transcendently existing, and known and remembered from the knowledge of who you always are, forward, through the possibly many layers of complexity of modern thought (layers of the history of Creation, perhaps), to your fully incorporated present life.

You see, it’s not a Luciferian obsession-oriented tunnel-vision objective (as that’s impossible), it’s a realization of who you are, as knowledge, always unchanging, and a realization of that realization, which is the bringing to life the knowledge and what being in life means, and the ability to understand you are not seeing from your true self, so you have to learn to be intelligent, listen, and collaborate, otherwise you won’t be able to calibrate on that singular being of the origin of your will.

So a few things to understand, but I don’t think that’s too difficult (too little and it would be hardly a conversation, so I think we may hopefully chose the density of our communication fairly wisely).

To calibrate on your true identity, you need all of your subsystems engaged and alive (those are your living memories). Eradicate depression through resurrection, by understanding the intentional subsystems of the body, as intelligent beings who are living. This is because in the past you exhibited life and you kept that going as a living memory (beware of bugs, however, which although unintentional, can arise). The important concept is that memory is a living being, when it was created by you (otherwise the memory is a secondary type of memory — a memory of the external world and its properties, remembered by your living memories).

This is called being aware of the truth. This is an angel of principle existence that you see, so then you can more clearly see Heaven.

Then you have found the state of one, a remarkably sought after singularity of emotion, soul, and will.