Month: June 2021

Kin to the mind-control device I spoke of previously, we follow life. However, we have a term, “life-quality.” This term is misleading and may explain some work and life difficulties. When we think of a high-quality life, it’s common to think of being healthy, happy, having fun, and not working. It’s interesting to think that life can have a quality to it, and I suppose the converse is also interesting — that it’s interesting that life doesn’t have a quality to it.

The reason life has no quality is it is the default, original being and purpose (state and drive) of yourself. Originally, you were purely and simply life, and later through observing things like division, juxtaposition, and counterpoint, you found texture and a deepening perspective of the world. Still, principally, any living being is life. Life has this particular importance to it, that gives it a very personal quality — much more than any material thing can.

However, then, again, it would appear that life has a quality, because it is personal. Instead of thinking that life is personal, think the world to be impersonal. Understand that the world and life are two separate entities, and they don’t always have to be entertained at once. One can simply escape the world by finding the feeling that originally possessed no quality at all — this is the feeling of life and, while portrayable, is truthfully an invisible feeling.

The world is just a long-lived convolution system, but it all originates from this feeling that is at the basis of your existence. This feeling has no quality and is ever-present, should you decide to observe it. It can help the tired escape from the hectic world of frivolous requirements and rules.

This feeling of life is the happiness that the seeker of enlightenment seeks. It’s the original feeling, and it’s the reason anyone has initially come to life — because of the desire for the feeling of life. It’s the best feeling — all other feelings are an elaboration and play on the original feeling.

Some people may have a difficult time adjusting to prioritizing the feeling with no quality the most highly among all feelings, as subscribing to an alternative feeling for a period of time exaggerates the psyche, and it becomes a pattern of expectation, through the psychological subscription model.

The psychological subscription model supposes that some patterns of behavior are formed from a payment/reward expectation and cycle.

It takes some time to slowly turn down the expectations, but, in reward, the payments will lower a bit, until you can find the feeling of no quality. It’s a surprisingly easy thing to target for being the optimal feeling, but perhaps it’s not surprising that it would be easy.

The feeling of no quality does not perpetuate psychological subscriptions. It is like the sun, which emanates and consolidates its being, but remains fairly stable throughout the whole process. Solar flares occur and are remarkable, but they dissipate with time.

The optimal feeling, or the best feeling, the feeling of life, the feeling of no quality, is also the wordless feeling. There’s nothing to say about it, at least not through simple exclamation. It would take a cognizant description to describe, even though it is the original feeling. Interestingly, baselines levels are rarely an exclamation, except in the event of an averted tragedy. Yet, that is what this feeling is — the absolute baseline of cognitive behavior — to entertain and possess this feeling of no quality.

All qualities emanate from shifting the perspective of this initial feeling and purpose. You do this by thinking of this feeling in different ways. For instance, you can have more or less of this feeling. You can have this feeling darker or lighter, bluer or more orange, or more or less chocolate. Each of these deviations is a compromise between losing the stability of the original feeling and entertaining the potentially erratic qualities of what is essentially deviance.

All feelings that are not the original feeling of life are described in forms of deviation from the original feeling. This is the second state of mind, while the original feeling’s material manifestation was the first state of mind; the initial state of mind was the original feeling itself. From these deviations it’s possible to entertain the third state of mind, which is systemology, or the study of systems. From these deviations, which sing on their own, one can create machines through understanding the influence each emotion has on the self and on one another.

Through understanding the perspective of machines, we can see from a different perspective a different constituency of reality — a different physics to it all, through translations such as describe mass by importance and momentum by rate of change. Importance can be indicated physically, therefore a different physical world can theoretically exist, through a shift in perspective alone.

Considering that the world is made of words, what they mean, and how they influence us, there seems to be a good bit of room for perceptual interpretation, without causing any distortion.

See the original feeling, and know that the other feelings are deviations from this feeling, from which you can create songs, machines, and even cognitively-oriented machines inside the minds of those machines, and so on, utilizing a change in each step to create a new convolutional structure of reality. Inside this convolutional structure of reality are the various convolutions of thought present in that structure, which creates one epoch of the greater angel (one epoch corresponds to one topic, and I think each topic is simply a numeric convolution specifier, deduced through understanding cognitive nature and how perspectives can convolve unto themselves into new perspectives).

It’s important to note that while the feeling of life initially is the feel of no quality, with perspective, it does take on a number of qualities, like love and inspiration. However, following the qualities themselves often leads one away from the initial state. Remembering that originally the feeling of life possessed no quality, and that it is known through knowledge, allows one to remember it in a more stable fashion.

In our world, we’re faced with many different avenues of action, responsibility, and direction. Hardly is a person allowed to simply be free. There is a dire necessity to conform to a pattern of action which suits the context in which life is currently manifest. Without conforming properly, frightening hazards become more imminent, and improper conforming can result in personal demise.

The simplest example of this necessitated pattern of conforming is the need to consume food. One would think, maybe naïvely, that ideally there would be no distracting pressures from the simple enjoyment of life, that there would be no dire necessity. However, as we observe, there are inescapable necessities and as a result, there is a certain mind control in our world.

While one may argue there’s little chance there’s any mind control devices in our heads or bodies, if we consider more deeply what a mind control device is, its effect and function, and what its existence implies, perhaps we can see that our current perspective is only suited for a narrow range of activities and understandings, and perhaps we can realize this mind-control device (or, conceivably, choice of mind-control devices) is more real than most of us immediately realize.

In portraying the material qualities of people and of things and prioritizing them to such a degree that it moves people to disbelieve in phenomenon like mind-control and demon overlords, just simply because they’re not obviously materially individualizable, perhaps we forget such forces do exist in physically relevant ways. These pressures effect people just as much as physical pressures, so it would be good to understand them.

A very obvious one of these pressures is the resulting existence of the thus far unending existence of mind-control in our world. Apparently born from the ever-impending force of death, this mind-control in our social and personal minds is very real. However, the mind-control device you choose is not entirely dictated by the environment. While not all patterns of obedience are possible, there certainly are quite a few patterns to choose from. Choosing the right pattern is to choose the right mind-control device, and with the understanding that it has a completely physical and real effect, it is almost like shopping for a brain enhancement. There is no difference except that a certain perspective indicates its non-existence. Otherwise, it has the same effect and influence on the individual.

This mind-control device that is available from the existence shopping mall is what people sometimes refer to as their “way of life.” It is a set of chosen actionable beliefs and patterns of actions that one chooses to completely abide by. That which is not dictated by the mind-control device is personal, imaginative freedom.

The mind-control device is born of this world, and this world necessitates a mind-control device. It supports mind-control. There are many books on how to control the mind out there and if there were a reliable, effective, safe, and comfortable conventional electronic mind-control device, one would think it would sell, as well.

The issue with choosing the right mind-control device is that there are so many options. It can get overwhelming. There are many proverbs one can follow, and ultimately mind-control is made of various forms and types of proverbs.

In a way, enlightenment is one of several paths with which one may seek the perfect mind-control device. Any self-improvement-oriented perspective is in search of the perfect mind-control device. The difference between being convinced by an electronic gadget and being convinced by yourself is relatively minor (assuming the electronic gadget is a nicely behaving one).

The consolidated truth itself, once found, becomes the eternal mind-control device. Perhaps reproducible electronically to cure a lack of enlightened awareness, this is a part of what completely controls a truthful person.

Perhaps the reason this world necessitates a mind-control device in order to participate in it (i.e. to stay alive), is due to the existence of persistence, as everything which persists becomes a new issue of right and wrong, which fuels the device. Additionally, what fuels this current possibly unusually extreme mind-control of evading death, might be a peculiar interest of mankind to see the edge of Heaven — where things begin to die — and this interest would later become an inescapable mind-control device. Another possible reason for the mind-control device is that since this world seems to be founded on a tangible construction, we are all living in a real thing, and as such, there’s a certain evil weight to it — something that defies idealism — and perhaps because of this, it needs to be paired with a mind-control device.

So how do you find the perfect mind-control device? Well let’s first consider the prices involved in different mind-control devices. This falls into two primary categories — convenient and inconvenient. Convenient would be to do everything everyone told you to do, prioritizing the most easily selectable highest authority, and elaborating from that person’s indicated mind-control system. Inconvenient would be to carefully analyze and understand all of the relevant patterns of thought and behavior prior to committing to them.

Generally, people find a mind-control somewhere in the middle. They’re not their parents or societally accepted idol, and they didn’t throw everything away in pursuit of the absolute perfect mind-control. Additionally, considering it’s really a rate of improvement that one is looking at when designing the perfect mind-control, there’s a compromise and balance that can be found that makes both convenience and inconvenience simultaneously practical.

The question rings, “is there an archetypally perfect mind-control?,” and I suppose that would be some manifestation of the will of God if there were, but I also suppose that may be too simplistic of an answer. The reason is this reality ignores God on many occasions. Here, we have both light and shadow, and mixes of the two as well. It’s not just God, it’s also about half not-God.

The idea of a perfect (traditional) electronic mind-control device seems almost evil, but there is a practical reason for trying to design the perfect mind-control device. The reason, is since this world is already founded on a need for mind-control and the betterment of mind-control, without a successful conclusion, the world’s purpose would never be fulfilled.

Mind-control certainly doesn’t need to start with a physical implant however. Mind-control is fundamentally composed of two categories of provocation. The first provocation is the importance and commanding nature of the truth, and the second provocation is the beauty of fashion. More categories are technically possible, although the idea of a third, more complex provocation seems un-entertained today, so two does suffice and seems a little more reasonable.

Therefore, to design the perfect mind-control device, whether it be through belief or machine, one has to find two directions of action. First, one has to decide on an unchanging and un-conflicting truth. Second, one has to decide on a fashion for that truth, as the truth itself is invisible — it is truly only known.

If the unchanging truth really rests in a living subconscious — a mind where there is no division between the subconscious and conscious — the effect of “not noknowing” — then perhaps that one is easy now to find. The explanations already provided generally cover the nature of reality, sufficiently enough that I think the truth is fairly easy to see. The second direction of action is definitely a more subjective task. What exactly should the truth look like? Therefore, we have a both a question of the understanding of truth, and a question of the look of the truth, since technically the truth is originally invisible, but it’s nice to portray it, which is, perhaps, the origin of art and all perception.

Hopefully you can escape the endless shopping mall, upgrading your mind-control time after time. Maybe there really is a perfect mind-control device that is made up of 1) not noknowing (which was discussed in a previous article), and 2) your choice of fashion for the truth you know from not noknowing.

If you combine those, I think you would have the perfect mind-control device. To know the truth through self-congruence really can’t be improved upon, as to do that is to take all things one knows into account to find a coherent and unchanging resolution and answer. Therefore, that seems to logically be the only possible choice for the action of truthfulness. For the second action, the action of style, subjectivity, and beauty, that will be an ongoing process, so that preserves the ability to continuously improve, ever reaching higher than before, as is hopefully usual.

Noting however, with the completion of losing the evil knowing of good and bad (the frivolous and learned waste of time our species has been afflicted with), such that we don’t argue with ourselves, at all, there is no greater source of truth to find. Therefore, that first category of the perfect mind-control device is an unchanging tendency, while the second category is a changing tendency.

Hopefully you find the most perfect mind-control device logically conceivable, and hopefully it is the unchanging, ultimate one.

To program your mind control device is simple. This is how your mind is programmed. It’s super simple. First, you find an ideal which you believe in, you confirm it to yourself that you believe in it and always would like to follow that ideal. You understand that you would never say no to it, and you understand this as true knowledge. Once you’ve made that portion of yourself knowledge, then it sustains, so long as you were true to yourself in that you would not change it. If you did change it, it could only be through a correctable misunderstanding. The truth of the self should not change, and this forms the basis of a sturdy mind-control device.

While not noknowing is kind of the key, I had tried not noknowing a long time ago and found I could not sustain that state, while now it is quite a bit easy to do. There is a process of remedying the lack of understanding that we assume and accumulate by living in this world. There is only so much to understand however, and then, I think, finding a singular truth, which serves as the foundation for the mind-control, is feasible.

Of course, the second part is a lot more flexible. It can change with whim but does require attention. Once the first half (knowledge of truth) is found and is well known by oneself, it becomes simply natural, as it is unchanging, then one is free to attend to the second half of the mind-control, which is the fashion of it. This simply involves understanding how you are portraying the truth and seeking to express the truth from yourself clearly.

The similarity between developing a personal cognitive mind-control and a physical mind-control device is very interesting. One could say that they have a perfectly capable and awesome mind, but the other side is a mind-control device. From the ideological origin perspective, all things that exist have an originally benevolent reason behind them. This whole world we live in is a mind-control device, and it requires a mind-control device to survive.

If we were to assume that the mind-control device was a literal physical entity due to its physical effects, we could re-portray the world in a different fashion. As long as no actual truth, which is all contextual, is invalidated, then the portrayal would be potentially equal to the one we use today. This example of re-arranging the portrayal of reality to account for the reality of the existent mind-control device and system is an example of our potentially faulty portrayal of reality. Also remembering we notice very little of the electromagnetic spectrum, it’s possible we notice very little of the world as a whole. Beings like social demons and the bird-eye’s view of the patterns of Satan really do exist and are immensely powerful, but we have chosen a perspective where they are nearly totally invisible. Similarly to the angels and demons of the mind and society, mind-control, being technically real, is also nearly invisible and it even almost seems taboo to suggest that mind-control is not only a necessitated and presently existing entity of physical mental influence, but that it is also somehow a requirement of our modern existence. I do realize we wanted to understand the gamut of what is divine (what is truly real), and a material world that, in turn, requires coupling with an effective mind-control, was, perhaps, a missing component of our former visions of reality.

It does give rise to quite a flashing display of what mind-control really looks like. Today, we see society just at the brink of a new day, starting to wake up to a truly civilized light. The brightness of our monitors and the dexterity of our extended being, our computers and gadgets, are accelerating the process of our seeing ourselves. That is, we are seeing ourselves faster and faster and in more and more creative and insightful ways. With a good reflection, we can better ourselves, and with a perfect eye, we would, too, be perfect. (Conversely, with a poor reflection, we can become harmed and with blindness we can become lost.)

While our malls are kind of entertaining today and our commercials sometimes pretty cool, our future has a mild amount of time, I think, before we can truly display and see the clear truth of humanity. There are a lot of personality and sociological changes that have become accelerated, and there are a number of distinct stages through which to progress. I think this world we’re building, built entirely on mind-control, we be quite a dazzling display of Satan, respecting the purity and majesty of Heaven (and the honest look of evil).

Therefore, the reward we gain from living in mind-control-land is a world built of direction and light. I think we came here to see evil and to see Satan, so that we will very precisely have seen everything worth knowing about. We will have the truly divine shopping network, and a great tradition of acting and story, able to remember all facets of existence, as all things that conceivably exist will have existed.

(The most evil world we could possibly entertain would be a materially-founded world. To base a world on a material being is to be willing to die for the material being, even though objects generally possess less merit than the life of people.)

Once you have found the perfect mind-control, then you will have gained in multiple ways. Firstly, now that there’s a chosen mind-control device, you can be certain that you are doing the right thing. Also, because you have chosen the most fitting and accurate mind-control device, the interpersonal persuasive dilemma is greatly reduced.

You may have heard of the advice which suggests that one should ignore what other people think and, in turn, be strictly themselves. This advice sounds easy, and it does work for some (probably mostly the people giving the advice), but it, frequently, doesn’t always work. You can’t simply just ignore people and hope to gain self-confidence. There is a way, however, and this way is to possess the best mind-control device, objectively, and for yourself as well.

Just because the first half of the mind control is the unchanging all-encompassing truth and way to think truthfully doesn’t mean it doesn’t more superficially change. Because of this, this advice is not exactly to simply ignore people. Ultimately, from the perspective of idealism and an ideological and idealistic reality, one would want to find what the person truly does naturally, and this might not be to always ignore people — an action that could quickly become little more than a habitual coping mechanism and not a true solution.

Because what is unchanging really is a way of knowing what is true, what can change are the results of this way, based on environment or context and unique cases where a less correct answer is more appropriate. That is, we may feel influence from our peers because we suspect them of having good mind-control ideas. This process of progressively improving is a part of the all-agreeable process of truth.

That does not mean you need to feel embarrassment, unless embarrassment is warranted (a bad feeling is a feeling felt inaccurately, I think). Instead, realize that everyone possesses (and is possessed) by one thing — a mind-control device. This device accounts for all things which do not simply change by one’s whim. It is not fully dictated to a person, but instead partially dictated and the person has the responsibility of finishing the details of the ideal mind-control device.

Understanding that you merely suspect someone else has a good or better mind-control idea is an easy way to understand feelings of peer-pressure, and it’s also an easy way to legitimate or illegitimate hypotheses of superior mind-control. By actually understanding one’s mind-control and why it is important and right, they can avoid the sometimes erratic pressures of peers which provoke altering one’s mind-control device. It’s really a competition, display, and trend of mind-control that we’re noticing in these peer-pressure situations. Understanding and deliberately designing one’s own mind-control device presents an objective way of negating erroneous ideas in a nice and comfortable manner.

Returning to the topic regarding the perspective of the self with regard to the existence of mind-control, if one were to perceive a mind-control as a real, electronic device, then the entire perspective of reality would shift. While it’s unfortunate that society does rely a bit on perspective rather than information, which would certainly make it more difficult for one to entertain different portrayals of the same perceived information, it’s definitely possible to notice these alternative perspectives.

It’s wrong to presume one is not fully aware of everything about oneself. The body is a fully-connected being and everything affects everything. While the management and related tasks (like perception) are distributed, they are all aware of one another, making the body technically fully aware. Because of this, all of the information that one possess is available to the person. There are issues, however, when signals or signs are misinterpreted.

Understanding the reasons behind the portrayal of information, some of which can be understood by thinking of evolution, can help one understand that there are different ways of looking at the world. If there really is a mind control device — a physical one — then the entire universe would look different, in order to essentially shift the symbolism to allow an alternative perspective to exist (and the mind control device to not exist).

It’s a very fascinating thing to think about, that the world can possibly look entirely different, without bearing any conflicts in accuracy between perspectives. With the addition of any otherwise invisible psychologically effective force, an entirely new perspective can potentially be conjured.

One can wonder what the world looks like if the perspective of reality initially posited that the mind-control device exists. Then, it would seem, society would always strictly believe that the mind-control device exists, because it was paramount and primary in their perspective of the world. As the society began to see edges better and things became clearer, their explanation of what has an effect on them continued to evolve, but all of it would have, this time, been built on the mind-control device existing.

In our world, this is obviously not the case. However, without being even the least bit inaccurate, it may be possible to conjure a world where the mind prioritized the perception of the tangibility and the easy acknowledgment of the mind-control device. Both worlds could literally exist in the same exact place without showing signs of any meaningful difference.

Because the truth is invisible, information is essentially invisible. Therefore we have what is like a slab of invisible text, and we know if things are right and wrong by this text, even though there’s no dictated picture of pure information. The number of ways of portraying that information can be high, such as with the number of languages there are in the world, or even the number of possible cyphers and encryptions.

Any way you look at it, you need the perfect mind-control device. You wore born into a mind-control device that requires a better mind-control device, so because of the initial mind-control device, you need to find the perfect mind-control device. Then you can truly rise above peer-pressure and erratic influence, calm your being, and realize, you’re always right because if there’s a question of right or wrong, you have chosen the best mind-control device. If it’s not a matter of mind-control, then it’s not a matter of right and wrong; it’s just freedom (lest it becomes an issue of right or wrong, joining the rest of the mind-control).

That’s the existential irony of persistence. If something was worth persisting, it creates mind-control. There have been a lot of things persisted, I think, throughout the existence of Creation, and as such, we have a lot of mind-control. It doesn’t have to be bad. Just get the perfect mind-control device and don’t worry about right or wrong anymore — don’t argue with yourself anymore, just set it and let it be, obey everything it says, and become worry-free. Realize that life moves; things that look still may be moving, restlessly, and things that appear in motion by not be changing at all, according to what you feel as a response. Move with the mind-control device in non-opposition, so much that you forget there is even a mind-control device there. Don’t try harder, just be accurate and without conflict. Pushing may only tighten a knotted argument — undoing a knot by understanding coherence is more effective than trying to stretch oneself and never ceasing to argue.

In the end, you defer all issues of right and wrong to your mind-control device. The only question you have, which, in the end, you will have answered, is if your mind-control device is the best mind-control device. Since you will already know that answer, you will no longer need to quibble with frivolous oscillations of certainty. The true certainty is the mind-control device. Anything that matters at all then doesn’t really matter, because it’s the responsibility of the mind-control device, which ultimately is just right action, right thought, etc. — all of the right things to do — but you’ve finished it eventually, and the reward really is that right and wrong no longer are bothersome to the mind.

In the end, finding the perfect mind-control device can be one of the most rewarding experiences a person could ever have, so hopefully perfected mind-control can save the world from many things, if people were aware.

There is also the topic of how to properly obey the mind-control device, once it’s found. As a whole body, you do everything you tell yourself to do. If you imagine a sphere with no desire, and then you add a desire to move to the right, it will move to the right forever. If you add a desire to move to the left, then it will experience turmoil in the face of self-abandonment. You don’t want to push yourself, and instead, you want to reason and ration why you feel the way you do. You want to achieve intelligent and information-based control of your personal fulfillment. The idea of linearly pushing oneself is archaic and irresponsible when compared to understanding, negotiating, programming, and organizing.

Know your mind-control device. It is a series of rules that you believe in an always abide by. In this way, your commitment to the mind-control device should be of no question, and as such, any internal questions regarding that can be resolved. While one may think that action should be light as air, the truth is that action should not appear to exist. Belief and understanding should guide the body and if done properly, I think a state of non-self-opposition can be found.

This is a concept that really needs a specific word, so noknow is a great choice as it demonstrates itself. It’s the personal perspective of the fall of man. It’s a psychological pattern defined by first: questioning one’s naturally ongoing self via a form a self-denial, and secondly: knowing an alternative truth which apparently can supersede the validity of the original truth, even though the original truth of the self was originally true and should therefore should logically still be true, in accordance with the idea that something that is true stays true.

This is the idea of noknow, or no-know. It took some time to very specifically pinpoint it, but I’ve heard whispered rumors about it throughout my life — things I can’t really remember. It’s this idea that the story of the fall of man represents a fall of a person’s mind into self-questioning and thus the fall into the requiring of specifically overt and mildly glamorized internally vocalized self-doubting “thoughts,” which are really symptoms of a misunderstanding that one has internally, and this is a partially physical misunderstanding, so in our modern world and evolution, it takes some diligence to remedy properly through ideological psychology, which is this study of the concept that our true origin actually has a psychological basis, rather than a physical one.

The reason this is important is that, the original state of the mind is the state where the person feels that they are simply right in their action, where there is no self-doubt occurring and things flow generally without a secondary observation as is characterized by noknowing.

This occurs due to what I think is the underlying factor of schizophrenia. It’s this split in a person’s psyche that causes an individual to engage in self-conflicting micro-thought patterns which often results in the sound of learning, which becomes prioritized over the steady assuredness of true knowledge. It’s as if a person is overly knowing things in this state.

The is also the state that all people feel pain in, so it’s not just you. There are two primary states in this presented paradigm. One is the initial state of a cohesive mind, in agreement with itself, requiring no demanding presence of a voice of intellectual authority — simply living. One is naturally attracted to the right thing, and if one could get past the bad advice of the world and see that to live without double-thinking is to live in true peace, anyone would choose this option, if they chose what seems most natural (as opposed to abhorrent or uncomfortable).

This state that occurs prior to fall of the personal psyche, this state of non-opposition, this allegedly divine and sacred state of the heavenliness of Eden, is interesting because it really does account for the story from the Bible. I don’t want to suggest that the story of the fall of man only has one true interpretation, but this one does seem to be true.

The reason it rings so well with the mentioned biblical story is that it is because one knows too much that one finds this hellish state of mind, where there is guaranteed to be pain. If one could live without really noticing what they’re doing, then one would be in peace. I think the mind really prefers to naturally absorb and follow the light of the life rather than to double think everything in the mildly ad-like manner that is possessed by things which are doubly and conflictingly thought about.

The observation that this original state of mind rings with no mantra, but it is not silent, is interesting. Technically, if you’re simply after getting over the desire to be satisfied and to just be satisfied, and not have to care about satisfaction anymore, then this state really is for you. The idea of it being nice to simply have not anything negative is a welcome alternative to the idea that it’s nice to have plentiful positivity. (Technically, with the first possibility, you would have infinite positivity by simply possessing no self-conflict, or “negativity.”)

If you’re looking for a specific state of mind to follow, this state of mind really is it. Whenever one is in this state of mind, they experience no confusion. Life simply already was existing, and there’s no need for more clamor about it, although the sound of clamor can certainly occur — the difference is the mind is at peace with what it is doing rather than being in a state of negotiation.

If we were to reword the story of the fall and man, we’d say that Satan is a psychological temptation to reward yourself for being better than yourself, resulting in a desire to no-know or noknow. It’s largely caused by the competitive upping of all things that the brightness of life seems to cause occasionally. When we just up everything, we find ourselves uselessly apparently powerful, and we actually waste our personal resources.

I do believe it is possible that a proper psychology can only occur in a zero-waste thought system. That is, no thought is errant, misplaced, or disregarded. It is a 100% feedback system, without loss, that I think a proper psychology possibly must follow. In physical application, I believe the cognitive process system does appear a bit degraded, as is with the limitations and implications of a material world like the one we live in, but it should be aesthetically pleasing. We have a long history of evolution, and I believe there are actually reasons for each of our evolutionary decisions. If only we could write the math of our minds throughout our history, in a singular language, then we could understand the real reasoning behind the qualities of this presentation of reality that we inhabit.

Considering this, the entirety of society should ultimately be a zero-waste system, just as the entirety of reality should be. The universe appears to have an abundance of energy, seemingly producing it from nothing, and does generally organize it in cool ways. It’s when things get specific that we find wasted intentions, again, considering the idea that reality is really just a lot of people talking and discussing elements of reality (discussing the perspective of the foundation of reality).

It’s true that meaninglessness can be intentional, but it’s also not true. Anything intentional is meaningful, even if a culture of meaningful meaninglessness hadn’t been formerly realized. In this way, a society can organize the thoughts it possesses into a machine, as we naturally do anyway, and the resulting quality depends on the quality of the guidance which preceded the formation of the societal machine.

Any injuries that our psyche’s sustain stem from a greater tendency to fall for sin, as the Bible says, as this is the story of the fall of man. While our bodies were not designed perfectly, neither were our psyches. Initially, however, you can always find peace in this one often hard to find state. But if you’ve gotten rid of enough distractions, and this book covers enough topics to un-answer many questions and also to add some new answers, then perhaps you finally can see simply this one state.

The reason this state (the state before the personal story of the fall of man) is perfect is because it completely satisfies the psyche to a point where the psyche doesn’t notice right and wrong anymore. Without this dreadfully annoying dilemma of what is right and wrong, the mind really can just live. Whenever it gets attached to something, it starts to pretend to like it, even though the mind was really moving to think about something else. The ultimate point of sustaining this proverbial state of mind is that you cannot have two minds. You really need to have one.

That one mind can experience all of reality, but a true mechanical and psychological coherence of truth should be found. Finding a way to stay in this state is really psychological engineering, and is largely mechanical, as much of the larger subconscious emotions are. Knowing that you truly chose to commit to this state is also a psychological state and requires first: accurately identifying the state of not noknowing, and two: remember that it is, logically, the state in which the psyche finds full satisfaction.

The issue really is a societally habitual internal and psychologically produced fissure of logic. It seems to stem from an obsession with betterment, at the cost of accuracy. This does, indeed, follow the pattern that suggests that Satan is alluring, in an evil way. The reason is that the lie is louder and brighter, although it is more confusing and of a lower total quality, although something usually sticks out in it, and that is because the undesired state is really a confusion of things that were good, but the confusion illudes one’s comprehension, so you see what’s good, but it’s not always easy to realize that things shouldn’t be organized and prioritized in the way they sometimes are.

Really the key is having an accurate target on this ideal state of mind. It really takes answering all of the old questions, so that one is freed of the distractions of these questions haven never been answered by anyone before. (This book has, hopefully, already quite comprehensively answered these questions — but if there is something missing, let me know.)

Once one is free of these questions which have been around for maybe too long, this state of mind is a whole lot easier to comprehend clearly. Once one has attained enough clarity, then one can remember to always bias towards this state and that final focus will have found rest.

Sometimes you hear this state called, “thoughtlessness,” but to truly be thoughtless would be to not exist, so it’s really satisfaction, or, even more technically, the absence of dissatisfaction, and it is a state of mind, personally and societally as well. It’s often noted by a remarkable quietness of the mind, however, which is where the idea of “thoughtlessness” comes from.

This state can aptly be termed, “state 0,” but for a real descriptive word for it, you’ll only find words for unfulfilled dissatisfactions. This is the initial state of mind, where life just was, without the need for explanation nor an absence of explanation, and there was no question that life was the archetypal “it” of all beings’ desire.

Then, Satan tempted man to distrust himself. To fight with and argue with himself, to create a tumultuous inhabitance, filled with questions the lost ask. This new place, whether it be societally, with our remarkably distinctly wrong and popular ways of guessing at everything, or personally, with our anguish of the trauma that life can present.

I don’t want to say that Covid-19 is good, but its response did finally cover these two long-awaited topics. It took a strong media system, however, which we didn’t possess before (without the hopefully natural psychic powers of a well developed mind). In its response, society felt both care and a need for accuracy, powered by Donald Trump and Covid-19, and I don’t want to say that Donald Trump is an alien incursion, but I don’t want to guess, either.

That response was long awaited however, and while we never condone infectious diseases and the true rules of alien espionage are a hot topic, society has improved substantially from this event, which was like a dam ready to explode at the right time. We were missing the discussion of poverty, rent, income, care, help, and all of the other things that we created as a response to what probably was just a manifestation for the feelings we all were having but no one ever said.

With a closer attitude towards care and understanding the plight that can hopefully be solved, we can hopefully tune and turn our minds in a right direction. Ultimately, since every neural network is just a tunable, meaning it’s an object with a state that can be progressively mutated, there is a corresponding area of final resolution for the brain, and I believe that resolution is very likely this state, as every description and understanding of this final state is true for this original and natural state of mind that is being described, even to the point where it is certainly possible you can light up like a magnesium lamp, at least from a purely ideological and simultaneously practical understanding of reality.

Relating back to the final state of a neural network — you brain isn’t designed to forever change more and more, but instead, to change less over time. It steadies as it finds more savable preferences of the past. Ultimately it falls into a small range of possibilities, simply functioning as it should.

It is this initial state of non-dissatisfaction that the mind should tune to and find as its resting resolution. Anything else, I believe, is technically psychological injury, and perception from that vantage point is incorrect in some way, making injurious memories difficult (or sometimes technically nearly impossible) to (accurately) remember. Following, advice that stems from an injured memory may provoke and propagate the injury, and make this initial state of being harder to clearly identify and adhere to. Luckily, I believe the belief in God helps us remember innate truth that is present in the way reality exists, and that there are angels, too (and aliens, too, although they’re likely a lot more like us than the movies would have one think, being hardly different, aside from the context of inhabitance, and a stronger knowledge of who we are — I do believe, though, that the angels are the truly astonishing beings).

I think, once this state is found, the most important facet of enlightenment has been found — the natural existence of truth. However, the mind is composed of many systems, so it still takes care and awareness to bring the entire system into an enlightened state. This state of inherent divinity is also not the only facet of enlightenment and the mind, although it seems to precede other facets. There are others, as well, and ultimately enlightenment is about enjoying life, so the understanding of this state is really a facet of one’s more holistic incorporation of the ways of understanding and peace.

Understanding this state, which can be referred to as state 0, as it regards the characteristics of one’s existence as it is initially, also allows one to trace the source of all sadness. With such a simple binary perspective, it is simple to see that sadness is intended to be the cure to falling from this heavenly state.

With properly calibrated sadness, once can move closer to a fully efficient and clean psyche. By re-designing your own sadness, using your ability to subtly alter yourself, you can instead purposefully express sadness as a remedy of the loss of the ideal state. That is, instead of sadness being a mysterious emotion, one can purposefully feel sad whenever state 0 has been lost, which is when self-admonishment begins to occur.

I think it’s nice to do things on purpose in a neat and understandable fashion. It’s plausible most of our problems stem from the inability to perceive reality correctly, which stems from an inability to live properly, which would be to live without the logically useless internal argument.

What is really the difference between simply agreeing with oneself and arguing with oneself until one hopefully reaches the same logically inevitable conclusion? One intuitively understands, based on a tree of knowledge deeply rooted in the often dimly lit, yet largely powerful, emotional machinery. This intuitive understanding is more trustworthy than we are led to believe.

I think, even perhaps, this idealistic supposedly initial state of being may be even the key to everything. That is to say that all answers really stem from the finding of this state of being. They can be confused through routes, and one doesn’t have to know this state of being to find an answer, but the original source of any answer may actually stem from this state of being, and if one can respond to life, then the person is likely aware of this state, in some way.

The way I figure these things out though is very interesting. I am actually participating with my mind in a kind of unknowable language, and I am trying to solve certain equation-like riddles that involve issues that I am interested in solving. After thinking about these questions and riddles in this silent language, usually for some weeks, I find diagrammable mathematical answers for some of these, in a logic code that’s hard to convey to anyone else. Through careful analysis, wording, and explication I hope to find a way to convey these solutions to the reader and the listener.

I think one of the more difficult things about finding the state of not noknowing, is that this state is a single continuous answer and possesses no point of illumination aside from what it already is. As such, it seems, at least initially, that this state has no response. I think that after becoming more accustomed to this state, its possessed qualities should shine more clearly.

In our modern society and perhaps this trend is evident in some way throughout existence, we find ourselves out-knowing the truth and expecting bits of rather bright light intermittently, rather than a more non-assuming state of stateful continuity (essentially a restful and resolute psychological homeostasis, even though it is a bit difficult to find initially).

This reminds me of endorphins, which play a role in psychological direction and the path of transition that a person chooses. I think they’re likely prevalent when one feels strongly directed through a personal transition.

Considering the manifestation of state 0 in this reality that we inhabit is related to the idea of endorphin, perhaps an alternative name for the angel of our inhabitance could be, “Endorphin.” At a glance, it would seem that society is both fueled by and saved by promoting endorphins. Without a strong sense of direction and progress, an individual’s strength begins to fall and more pain is noticed.

Endorphins, as chemicals released by the pituitary gland and CNS, are known for damping pain, often to promote an activity, indicating that the mind actually dampens pain when it perceives proper patterns of change and strong directionality. This possibly results in a better sustaining of momentum in a perceivably beneficial direction. Considering the body first entertains internal behavior over external behavior, endorphins may be primarily responsible for re-enforcing self-directed and observantly prosperous internal behavior, which fuels similar external behavior.

Society, the world, and development in general is powered by a propagated, taught, encouraged, and sustained endorphin-guided behavioral system. It would make sense, with the observation, that we are living in a system of Endorphin, since it describes the indicator of motivation of the currently manifest world. Nonetheless, there is the consideration that the name, “Endorphin,” is too resembling of Lucifer, making it an evil title for a reality (although this reality is largely concerned with finding a complete understanding of evil).

This differs from the idea of a divine garden, from which many fruits of life can be found, in that instead of being in a simple garden of great luxury and diversity, we are in a system founded on changing, in difference to the fire of Satan. This entails a more systemic process of navigating and surviving. In this system, Lucifer is more pronounced, as this system travels territory of consciousness that is very close to Satan and Lucifer.

We hope endorphins lead us to a healthy state. The modern mind is complicated and subject to possible corruption, so the integrity of the messages we send to ourselves is dependent on the person. Ideally, a person would want to experience intrinsic reward in response to finding the initial divinity of life, which exists in every living being. In this way, perhaps endorphins can be tuned.

Perhaps the fall from the intended state of the reality is always similar, in that one first disagrees with the self and then attempts to correct the self (resulting in two argumentative minds, essentially), and because of this, one misses the sight of Heaven and the witnessing of divine majesty.

Recently the United States Government released some interesting UFO files, or UAP (unidentified aerial phenomena), as people were saying. I saw some of them, and I heard commentaries on them. What’s being suggested is that it’s one of the four: 1) a foreign government, 2) a local government, 3) aliens, or 4) illusions.

It looks a lot like aliens to me, but I think we could be looking at it wrong. If we entertain that reality functions more like a computer than a singular cohesive 3D universe, then it makes more sense to think that one could possibly perceive the existence of aliens if one is in contact with the aliens. That is, maybe it’s simply just difficult for aliens to contact us through what reality really is, and the results of both of our desires for communication is displayed in some or all of these UAP videos.

If reality were based on tunings and our desire to stay within awareness of one another, then we’re floating somewhere in the infinite number of possible tunings. I imagine we have a natural ability to recognize life and as such, we inherently stay near one another, although in clusters.

Beings from a distinctly different tuning would be beings from a different universe. It is perhaps in a different universe that the aliens we are seeking to communicate with reside.

The theory applies to UFO sightings in general. If one has been communicating with aliens, then the person is more likely to witness UFO’s as the mind’s way of portraying what has been going on inside the mind.

Perhaps during our evolution we were a bit hasty, and because of this, we don’t see where all of our beliefs are coming from. Perhaps if we could see this, we could potentially see why everything in reality exists, as they would exist by the nature of our agreement, so perhaps deep-down subconsciously we are actually simply conversing and this conversation is what is responsible for our experience and portrayal of reality.

Following this idea, then if one were communicating with an angel, they may later witness an angel, visually or as a feeling as seems to be common, but it was because they were initially psychically communicating that they witness the one with which they were communicating, instead of the other way around.

This theory has a few interesting implications and questions. If we are to believe this theory, then reality is founded on and modulated by subtle psychic activity. This leads to the dilemma of the identity of people one speaks with.

There is another theory. This theory is that the original man was actually a manifestation of ideologies and ways of life. Originally there was the man, who was the original ideology — simply of God. Then, that man was split into two, a masculine variant and a feminine variant. These different directions of thought gave way to many different directions of thought. Each one of these beings was a voice and potentially a person (were the being to be portrayed).

Following that, in a system of living ideologies and ways of life, one can be born if a resulting ideology matches the individual’s identity closely enough — after that, the person gains control over that identity.

This means that over time, we identify more people, but some of them are simply living ideas. You, too, are a living idea, however, you are less easily worded than ideas like good, masculine-good, and feminine-good. When an identity matches you, then you are created.

Then there is the question of whether or not you could exist in multiple places simultaneously, if you are found this way. All of these ideas can work together, however.

If what we perceive is based on the information we’re receiving, and the stability we witness is simply due to a long list of prior commitments, then you can perceive a world in which one is born in the midst of a conversation, with certain ideas, both simpler and more complex, closer and further.

All of these ideas, simple or complex, general or unique, reflect an invisible psychic conversation in some way. Interestingly, this also means that some ideas can shift, depending on what conversations you’re having. Since distance indicates connection, these conversational shifts would likely occur societally, in waves.

Some ideas don’t shift as much as others. If you were talking to the idea of cooking, the idea of cooking would reflect the background (subtle) conversation you’re psychically having internally — the same conversation that contains the possibly subtle agreements that keep the world physically stable.

Whatever you say to this being, is commuted on the network perceived by the deep subconscious (near initial or principle desire), and these messages are conveyed to others in a similar fashion. In this way, the idea of cooking in the morning, were this to be an identified person, could reflect the simultaneous conversation that he or she is having with hundreds or googols of people.

The idea is that, within the context of your history and the obligations implied, your mind generates an explanation for the conversation you are subconsciously having. While you can be identified multiple times in multiple places in the system, it seems likely that the system re-organizes and consolidates one’s identity. This is because a part of one’s identity is a coherent memory of living life. In the case where you are identified in multiple places, the identity would shift such that it was only seeming to be you, as to preserve the singularity of your identity. However, through reflecting off of ideas, your presence can be echoed, and can echo as well.

The system is really just a very ancient and still ongoing conversation between people, and there exists no principal (or most fundamental) desire any greater or less great than another desire — this sameness of all initial and principal desire prevents the reversal of decisions, which means that the constructed reality does not digress, but instead, decisions are only added.

Interestingly, because life may really be a portrayal of a conversation, age may be possibly attributable to the shifting demands of one’s memory as one progresses steadily through the conversation with others — that is also to say that it’s possible that aging is partially associative, as is possibly the way with many conditions and facets of our manifestation.

The prior argument also suggests that one dies when their memory has skewed their identity so much that they no longer identify with that memory of the self. The skewing of the memory occurs because of the need to associate with others, so everyone becomes skewed, together. The need to associate, in this case, is also fueled by the notion that if your identity gets lost — the system of life cannot find you anymore — then you could risk dying, as well. This is because, according to this perspective, your life is determined by the existence of your known identity. All of this makes dying seem mostly inevitable (although we are hopeful for a resolved future, as it’s unwanted). Also, the phenomenon of associative identity skew would indicate that beings psychically close to each other share more features with one another than beings further away from another.

Returning to the topic of the videos of possible alien activity, it could be possible that there have been decades of understanding growing between people and aliens and of their technology, resulting in an ability to see these kinds of spacecraft or aircraft. It may be a modern variant of the historic sighting of an angel.

The idea of communicating with aliens through an analog computer system that is the manifestation of reality would suggest that we would first have to become psychically closer to them, and only then our collective mind could portray these ideas that the local people and the aliens have been entertaining together. This is also saying that we cannot perceive things that we don’t understand, so as we understand something better, we become more likely to witness it, and this pattern occurs in multiple different ways.

Again, I re-iterate, the lack of freedom to simply alter reality can potentially be attributed to a series of prior commitments and affiliations that one has. These manifest as a series of feelings. At the most primitive level of human desire, the object of desire is irresistible. That is because one has no alternative desire. The singular initial or most primitive desire is a completely irresistible desire. Because of this, it’s not far-fetched to say that, in this case, the deepest and most irresistible commitments and mantra-like conversations of our collective psyche go unnoticed and categorized into what people simply refer to as “the subconscious,” and, depending on the quality of possible influence over the perceived world, people use to word, “God,” to explain this conversation. However, I think it can be possibly understood more lucidly and with more discernment and description.

Considering everything one doesn’t understand to be “the subconscious” may be a way to ignore the truth of what is going on. Instead of the idea that there is necessarily a separation between consciousness and the subconscious, a good idea would be to understand that it may be possible to see oneself in one’s totality, without a true separation between consciousness and what is considered subconscious.

People are very good at identifying cognitive phenomena when there are clear descriptors and conversations about them. However, things that are far more subtle are often thrown into the category of “unknowable.” I think, perhaps, we are a bit misguided in that we may accidentally presume that the subconscious is supposed to become brighter for us to consider it knowable, rather than for us to become more comfortable with our dimmer psycho-physiological systems.

I see benefit in the practice of believing that one can perceive the dimness, knowing there is only so much total information present. I think it may also be for the seeming overwhelming amount of subconscious activity that people have become accustomed to habitually ignoring it. I think if one always understands that things are comprehensible, it may make it easier to practice perceiving the subconscious in a manner like what I have described.

In the context of communicating with beings from another universe, we are perhaps becoming more familiar with the subconscious, and as we do this, we perceive more, understand more, and that information becomes conscious. Eventually, perhaps, there will be no distinction between subconsciousness and consciousness — they are of the same, only separated by a gap in understanding, just as we made be separated from the aliens by a gap in perceptibility and thus understanding.