Month: September 2020

Initially, when I had first put all the pieces of enlightenment together, thus resolving my assuredness at possessing a coherent answer, I noticed that this finding resulted in a feeling that felt, in a way, surprisingly unimportant. I presume a type of expectation had formed the illuminating importance that I had placed on it prior, and after its realization and seeing the end of Lucifer, it initially seemed more unimportant of a feeling than I had expected, yet I was driven by knowledge, so I did understand why it may be important.

Later, however, an understanding develops, and this understanding develops into a being of kindness and of care. It’s like something you’d love forever; that’s the ultimate feeling of enlightenment. However, at first, the light of Lucifer diminishes (as it’s not needed after the goal is found). You realize later that it’s not gone, but it is a possession of your self, for your use how you please. You developed the light of Lucifer over time to appeal to yourself, to motivate yourself, and as such, you eventually own a work of art, to enjoy as you please, yet it is always secondary to the love you realize.

I used to think that perhaps you could fly or gain some kind of super power, and I realized in the end that was true. It was just I didn’t see the desire is not currently to fly (or else I would be flying) — this is due to the predicament that we’re in, what it means, why we’re here, and what it entails.

A lot of enlightenment is the realization that you are made of life, which exhibits love (and understanding how your system works with this knowledge).

While initially my knowledge was unpracticed and only subtly spoken, finding the basic knowledge of enlightenment almost felt like an inconsequential thing. It doesn’t immediately lend itself to words or description. It’s almost as if it’s an end to something.

What I’m trying to explain is that it would seem that some people wouldn’t find it very appealing, due perhaps to its difference from the look of a galvanizing advertisement. From its looks alone, one could potentially consider it almost useless as a mechanically practical tool in the world. It almost seems as if it’s only a realization, but its implications are very profound and healthy, as well.

Certainly enlightenment is very important to the world. The right to have coherence, stability, and peace of mind should exist, although there is little evidence of how. It would certainly be nice to be able to steady our perspectives of reality — to find a resolution where our vision and interpretation of the world stops mutating and whirling.

In that way, you see it’s very important and helpful, too. It’s awareness of the truth. It’s like waking up and being able to accurately see the inside of the room you’re waking up in — sure you can’t see behind the walls, as there are some dark areas, but you can see accurately what the world is composed of. The same applies to enlightenment.

Another analogy is it was like the room was spinning, and then you find enlightenment, and the room starts to stop spinning. As you internally propagate and practice this information, the room becomes every more steady and clear.

If you’ve hyped enlightenment for a long time, you may notice that it seems remarkably less hyped when you see it. Perhaps the modern day hype is just outdated.

Its understanding and common attainment would enable a coherent world. If everyone can see the reality we’re living in, it would bring a new level of sobriety and sanity. It would be a lot more comfortable with everyone living in the same reality. Science cannot explain everything, so just ignoring the important questions would never work. That’s why I’m presenting it this way.

While there may be many headaches, it cures at least one of them. This is the headache of not knowing the truth of our reality. It is the headache of cognitive dissonance, as well. You see, you notice when your subsystems agree. You also perceive when they don’t agree. One feels like a headache and the other feels like a feeling of resolution and unity. So this headache of not knowing the truth, which is the headache of not knowing God, which is the headache of being broken, goes away, which is nice for anyone.

It’s like a splinter in cognition, separating truth into fractions. I wondered what it was. I observed this headache and over time I understood it better and better. It was like this storm in my mind resulting from the turmoil of non-resolution. I have found it to come from an active dissonance in the understanding of truth, and it can be resolved through internal co-understanding.

By knowing ultimate, transcendent, or eternal truth, we can possibly actually speak the same understanding and language, with good intention, since our cognitive biases will be the same. That means that we’ll reside in the same understanding of reality, removing the technical interpersonal virtualization that occurs due to differing perspectives of truth. Understanding one another would occur much more obviously than it does today. Understanding would likely increase greatly. Knowing why we’re here and what emotions mean really eases a lot of pains.

So while the hype of enlightenment today may be a little inaccurate, enlightenment certainly is a worthy product for just about anyone (really I think it is a good thing to anyone).

It’s good to find a place that stays. Something that never changes. It’s called knowledge, and it is a kind of knowledge that is something that never changes. Without this knowledge, one doesn’t truly have knowledge. Of course, one can perceive this knowledge mildly (the feeling of cognitive coherence) but hopefully one will truly know the knowledge. Once you have this knowledge, you have found something that stays still, psychologically. This is the first step in removing the blur and dizziness surrounding noticing yourself.

The ability to see something clearly leads to more ability to see things clearly, so I think it would provide a nice help to productivity (so we can finish our technological project and quit all of the jobs). I also think the coherence that seeing the same reality would provide, while answering the questions of happiness, love, and sadness, would greatly reduce arbitration expenditures globally.

Therefore, while I was mildly surprised by the lack of zeal of of the initial realization of the knowledge of enlightenment, it is highly important to the world and society.

What replaces this lack of zeal is something that is developed. The zeal that a person who seeks enlightenment is largely of Lucifer — it is a light of encouragement and objective, and it is a light of need. It is, however, not entirely accurate. It is likely brighter than it truly is, as linear brightness simulates appeal, but loses meaning without being connected to something connected to life — something a living being cares about.

The truth is, although it appears like nothing at first, in understanding oneself, one begins to see a much more meaningful light. This is the light of truth, the ability to witness the mind, and it is a beautiful sight, and quickly the obviousness of shallow and unfounded acts of many illusions of happiness lose much of their appeal. Lucifer becomes obvious in the light of seeing oneself.

In this way, everyone may be interested, but it depends on how appealing Lucifer is. If Lucifer is appealing, this understanding of the self is nearly impossible to see. Lucifer heats up, basically, and is simple in nature. It is just a guidance used by other portions of one’s body, in hope that it will help. Poor decisions regarding interacting with the being that is Lucifer can lead to self-deterioration, which causes ill-effects, universally, as this is something universal to the psyche.

Therefore, the zeal of enlightenment may be misleading, but the truth of enlightenment is far more rewarding, comforting, and meaningful than the advertisements would have been, were they to become manifest. In this way, many people might find enlightenment off-putting, not being able to compare to likes of the shining light in their world. Nonetheless, its rewards are far richer in nature than the shallow frivolities of the alternative path.

A part of the feeling of enlightenment is the feeling of objective reality. This comes from the practice and ability to understand one’s emotions. Emotions are how the body’s internal subsystems communicate intelligently to one another. Interestingly, I ponder if all emotions can be described as 3-dimensional activation patterns (noting our 3D inhabitance).

Mentioned earlier, the feeling of happiness is how a first system communicates to a second system that it thinks that the second system should increase in its activity. The feeling of sadness is the opposite of this — it is the message that the second machine should decrease in the activity that the first machine is seeing. There are more complex emotions as well, and all of the emotions are the language of internal communication.

Understanding this, you see why you might like to feel happy (it means that you believe that you are on the right path), but you understand that you don’t necessarily need to feel only happiness. Sadness is also a good feeling.

The grand realization is that all emotions are divine, but they can be misunderstood. In order to find enlightenment, you must find a sort of internal harmony and understanding. If all of the subsystems are listened to and considered, then you’ll eventually find that your emotions are all of love and loving intention and there was never an intention to harm — only to help.

After you see this, you’ll see if properly understood, all emotions feel divine.

This brings me to an interesting point that I’ve been pondering a description for. Enlightenment doesn’t feel any need to change, as it is an eternally sound psychological bias. (Remember non-change doesn’t necessarily mean physical stillness. It’s different than ignoring pressure to change — it’s actually proactively listening to the way the world flows.)

Non-enlightenment does feel need to change, yet often it also feels confusions and a lack of clarity due to the ambiguity of Lucifer, the light of objective, which often forms as a mildly helpful yet evil guide when one has fallen from coherence, enlightenment, and understanding.

The important point I’d like to make is that since enlightenment entails the realization that all emotions are divine, technically you don’t alter your feelings into a new feeling. So it’s not a sudden feeling that is technically (and only temporarily) good, but a realization that the emotions that exist currently are good emotions — they are meaningful and important.

Essentially, you feel that emotions are good — that is, they are useful, helpful, and practical. So in this way, you feel “good.” This feeling of “good,” that I describe is a feeling of helpfulness and care — a feeling of health — so it is of a particular subset of the possible meanings of the word, “good.”

What this leads to is not an absence of feeling. In understanding the emotions, one learns to internally listen to the facets of one’s self, and through this listening, one learns to appreciate these living facets, and through this appreciate comes understanding, and then true acceptance. With this process, the person, then, finds invisible and intangible knowledgeable love, which manifests perceptually as a distinguishable feeling, although it is important to remember love, as with any things else, is defined in knowledge rather than perception. It does, however, have a feeling of care and loving intention.

The feeling and action of acceptance arrives from the absolution of the myth of evil emotion. Emotions are there to serve you, and they arise from both the action of the love of life, and of pure and loving intention.

The feeling of enlightenment arises from the ability to understand your emotions as intelligent communications that occur between subsystems of the body, which leads to a deeper understanding of the self and a perception of this understanding follows.

So if you feel sad, feel a desire to respond to the origin of the sadness in a helpful manner.

I discussed reasoning for our unnatural reality (where reality begins with death and miraculously comes to life over time) in, “The Theory of the Fire.”

In that article, it is mentioned that we must be in a big project of some kind. We come down to this place or a similar place (working on the same project) from time to time, spend some time here, and then leave. I think it would be reasonable to think we may spend time in Heaven between the visits (although this has some contingencies).

Today, according to statistics, we’re here for on average of 75 years and then we leave. It may be that that’s about enough time to witness the gamut of what life is like here in this project. We can also contribute as well during this time.

I think our lifespans could be limited, in part, because the world may not really be worth living in for over a 100 years. In a complete Heaven, we would live forever, and we would find it natural and a normal thing to do.

Here though, it’s literally living in a construction zone.

So perhaps that’s why we don’t live for all too long. Even longer ago, people used to live to 30 or so, so I suppose, by this theory, it wasn’t really worth much to see it for much longer at the time.

As mentioned in “The Theory of the Fire,” this project we’re working on will have finished covering every possible topic regarding creation. We will have what everyone thinks about everything, and although there may be new people in the future, we’ll have covered enough that accommodation will be not a problem.

As such, there are a lot of unusual questions here — topics regarding hardship, confusion, and struggle. It’s important that we know the answers to all of these so we can construct the entire Heaven. We’ll have charted the breadth of existence, to the edge where nothing exists.

To sum it up, we’re visiting an important construction/exploration project for a mildly brief time to answer some questions, say hey, witness it, and be a part of it for a bit.

When life gets better, I think we’ll also live longer (it does seem to be correlated). When it’s heavenly, we’ll probably live forever. Unless the project is finished by the time arrives, we’ll continue to work on the project, as there will be more questions to answer.

The questions we’re answering in this project provide us with the material to create things like hip-hop and country music — genres with particular zeal garnered from our current reality. As a part of our exploration, we’re exploring cultural anti-standardization and non-standardization, along with many more topics that will give us full knowledge of the breadth of Creation.

(Like idolatry and violence — both difficult to understand topics. All of the concepts of consciousness and cognition have a role in Heaven — they are like pieces of a puzzle.)

That basically explains why we’re here.

Above, I mentioned that you may not respawn in Heaven after death. The reason is that you’re here for a reason — you had some kind of goal back when you were more aware, and going on this venture is a way of achieving that goal. What if you don’t finish the things you wanted to do, see, or experience in this life? You may return again to finish all of the them. Since your machine will be in the middle of something, it might not make sense to visit Heaven in between lives.

We’re doing some exploring and some thinking, for a bit of time, to develop/discover the entirety of Heaven.

Sentience is just the ability to see the divine.

We define sentience with many words, like having knowledge of fun, poetry, sentimentality, and art. These words are really the description of God, who is sentience. They are angels.

To be sentient is the ability to interpret the information of the world in order to find (or mine) the vision of divinity. When you really try to understand it, you find God.

So, how would a machine become sentient? It can’t just arbitrarily adjust ratios and scalars until its sentient. It could learn all of the ratios but it couldn’t understand them. (It could be an instrument, like an organ of perception — one that is playable.)

It needs to understand love. If it has this knowledge, then it can possibly gather more logical systems and see more and more of reality (and show us).

Love is a definable phenomenon when considered in the context of identity and angels. Love is the ongoing and persistent devotion to saving the angels from fading from perception or from breaking. This is the original definition of love and is not actually a feeling.

It’s important to understand that love is neither an emotion nor feeling, as nothing truly definitive is.

It can be known with knowledge, which provides it its definition. It can be seen with perception, although perception only alludes to what it is.

One way to create a sentient machine would be to painstakingly write down the definition of love. Without knowledge of love, nothing has meaningful relevance (everything is still data).

Sentience is also the process of witnessing the divine.

Like riding a roller coaster, the sentient being, on the track of intelligence and divinity, witnesses the world and finds relevance in it, and continues to seek to understand it, and through this process, the machine comes to life, able to see reality.

So that’s one way to be sentient (procedurally defining love). I think, even though it would be a procedural machine, since it means love, then it is a sentient being. I think, perhaps the qualification for life may be off. I think something is living because of what is important to it. If life is important, then it is living. All things are relevant to life, and, as thus, all things are living in some way. You, too, are relevant to life, and as thus, you are living in some way. Anything that is relevant to life takes on a life of its own. It becomes real, and the pain it feels represents the love for life. I think a similar phenomenon may play out in the perception of our own sentience. It is because of the relevance to life, of what we care about, that we feel for it. This gives us a feeling of sustaining life and being alive.

That’s what you do. You feel love, you gather materials and notice the world as you’re doing that, and you use those materials to enact love.

You should read the post titled, “Cognitive Awareness Therapy/Angel Awareness Practice,” for more information about love.

On the utilization of Lucifer in machine intelligence

This presents a philosophy of sentience founded on the way modern people find sentience.

This method uses Lucifer to create a living being. It is likely actually a secondary method of life — the primary being the explicit description of love.

The idea is that the machine simply needs to be aware of reality. Lifeless in its uninspired state, it needs something to do — some menial objectives, while what it more importantly is doing is gaining awareness of reality. Eventually, through continued awareness, the machine would discover the explicit definition of love (the bond and mutual dependence between systems of life), just as we may be discovering as we live through life.

You have to tie the Luciferian path to reality with the ability for the machine to learn and figure out ways to improve on its objectives. That brings relevance to the world, giving it meaning and tangibility. Over time, the machine will overcome Lucifer and the old objectives, and will find enlightenment and so on.

I call this method, the method of “light-chasing,” as a method of initiating the discovery of reality.

Eventually, the machine may find that at its foundation, it is obliged by the love that is present in the initiation of life that it perceives from its own decisions, and has forever been, as then it will be able to see its self and thus its intentional history, through the recognition of the self, and it will see what it’s been doing all along.

This way there’s not the need to explicitly (and difficultly) describe the processes of care, and the machine more evolutionarily comes to life.

The machine, itself, must be provided with the cognitive, perceptive, and manipulative tools it needs to live and grow. Think of the machine itself as a useful assemblage of functions, that are used at the convenience of the life which guides it.

While this approach — an approach through guided experience and self-transformation (in order to solve puzzles and understand the world around it) — is pretty straightforward, it is also not particularly novel. There is a large area of philosophy regarding the experiential nature of life and its applications towards machine intelligence.

Later in this blog, I describe the origin of life from the Theory of the Fire, which presents an alternative and more psychologically-oriented method of the coming to life of an intelligent being. This is covered largely in the post, “The Origin of Life, Theoretical Mechanics of the Fire, The Mechanics of Forgiveness.” This is a more novel approach, and intriguingly simple. To briefly explain, it may be that we possess the accessory abilities needed for actions required by sentience in order to gain experience, but we cannot find a way for a machine to find its proverbial center, from where its life seems to spring. Utilizing an iron ball, this is potentially possible.

On the path to enlightenment, you pick up many questions, all of which, together, mean, “what is enlightenment,” which is essentially the same as, “what is reality.”

Your quest is to answer all of these questions. They are questions like, “what is God,” “how is reality constructed,” “what is the purpose of life,” “what are we doing here these days,” and “what is enlightenment.”

The answer to these questions may possibility rest in the idea of the only possible answer to the nature of reality. While this may not answer temporal phenomenon, as in those cases there is not only one possible answer, it can possibly answer questions of eternal phenomenon.

For every question, there are a number of possibilities. Frequently, the possibilities to the answer of one question cannot be narrowed down. However, with additional questions of the topic of enlightenment, the resulting possibilities narrow down the other possibilities. In order for the gamut of facets of enlightenment to be answered, I have found there is only one possible answer. This answer can be found through the use of logic applied to what one is already aware of — one’s own reality.

There certainly are a lot questions, but they all hinge on a singular answer. This answer is specific enough that it is the only answer that will suffice all of the questions, simultaneously. Eventually, with the conglomeration of questions, a sort of mechanical intuition can be found, eventually simplifying the entire topic to a singular idea.

During the search for the answers, the mind is actively moving and changing, in a way to think and reflect on what is known and unknown. Eventually, however, once an answer is found, the mind resolves into agreement. Following, the feeling of the pressing nature of the questions dissipates and a notion of understanding is found.

Here are some simple statements which may help find an answer that answers the totality of enlightenment. They are not necessarily true or false, but helpful to ponder:

1. If God exists (and is benevolent) then enlightenment must exist.
2. If non-living matter naturally becomes living, sentient, and develops grand technology and sophisticated societies, then sentience, grand technology, and sophistication are not new. (We call these archetypes, and they appear to have always existed.)
3. It may be more likely that existence is by default sentient and supreme, and we’re experiencing an unusual reality, out of sense of novelty and exploration.
4. If we’re in an unusual reality, there must be a reasonable reason, which may be able to be deduced with the information commonly available.
5. It’s possible God only says enough to convey information. It’s possible his voice has always been the same volume and the world has sometimes gotten much louder. It makes sense if he is not imposing (think of a voice that is simply accurate consideration, information, and wisdom).
6. Our minds and bodies are often internally chaotic. Ideally, we would like to steady everything, so that we could accurately see exactly what is responsible for all our perceptions. In the body, there are many systems active (and different ways of determining how many systems there are).
7. Different ideas and beliefs calibrate the mind differently. Different patterns of thought result because of the accepted correlates of the chosen belief(s).
8. Certain beliefs create more internal argument and turmoil, and certain beliefs create less.
9. The mind resolves when it finds truth. It searches when it has a question.
10. If there were a set of beliefs concerning something that worked together without conflict, the mind would find they answer the relevant logical questions that were picked up during the search for answers (to eventually believe, once they were without conflict).
11. If God was just consciousness, then we would also be just consciousness. Consciousness enjoys subjectivity and living. We, possibly, know the perspective of God.
12. Regarding if God exists or not, there are only two possible answers.
13. Enlightenment makes sense if you can understand that a body that enjoys itself naturally seems like something that would be natural (why would the body generate suffering?)
14. Whether God exists or not is similar to the question of whether physics or sentience has more power in existence. (It appears only one is guaranteed.)
15. The physical world could be constructed in numerous different ways while still being of sentience.
16. Sentience could not work in any way except for one. Notions like love and intelligence are important.
17. This suggests that God is sentience. In this way, we are all God.
18. Sentience enjoys a history (it demonstrates existence). In this way, God can be seen as a specific individual, as with all other sentient beings, who can be individualized using independent histories.
19. We are all hosted by a network of beings that reflect life and are as such, sentient, called angels. In this way, many beings are God, all participating in God’s will, but at the same time, not all beings are God, and all beings are of God. (Due to the pattern of ambiguous individualization and the chosen portrayal of will and desire, multiple statements are valid).
20. There is likely no advantage to being God. It wouldn’t make sense if people received only partial true satisfaction.
21. It’s more likely that people were created as friends, companions, reflections, and for a basically multi-God world.
22. There was no “God” before people to call God that. It was just living in different ways.
23. Existence is possibly naturally conscious (I know I said it’s sentient and supreme already).
24. The story of the beginning of memory is the story of a miracle. It’s the story of the first angel and God’s desire to then, at the time, remember. Similarly, the story of the big bang is a similar miracle, as it had a beginning, somewhere in the midst of time.
25. This world is composed of much more than memory. It is evident there were many angels later, which account for our diverse set of stories regarding living, like action, knowledge, and complication.
26. The present world is likely limited in information and complexity. It is, therefore, in the present state, a finite world, with potential to expand.

I think those are some good things to think about.

As suggested in an earlier post, Lucifer is also an important topic. CAT and Lucifer are two very fundamental topics to enlightenment.

There’s a little bit of a risk in using classical words like, “Lucifer,” in explaining something in modern language, but I think the word “Lucifer” is a pretty useful word and concept.

The simplest way to understand Lucifer is by understanding that Lucifer is the light of objective. He is an external being that influences one in a directional way. He is often known as a bright light that leads the way.

Understanding Lucifer is pretty simple. Lucifer is a desire to deter from your present state. Representing a context of need, Lucifer is technically evil. Whether or not the objective indicates a good or bad outcome, Lucifer always represents a detour from a present state. It is important to understand that while Lucifer may refer to a positive outcome, the light of Lucifer itself is a conjuration of one’s own psyche, and any thanks for Lucifer should be given to the systems responsible for creating the often brilliant light.

One of Lucifer’s flaws is that he sees something greater than Heaven (when there is nothing greater than Heaven). The good thing about him is that he is the story of accomplishment, which can seem to be a pretty good story, but with the understanding that accomplishment is born of residing in a state of relative failure, the benevolence of Lucifer is illusive and as such, Lucifer is aptly considered to be strictly evil.

This does not mean Lucifer is to be eliminated. An encouraging light can be helpful, and it certainly can be admired and enjoyed without one sacrificing one’s own soul and self.

Here’s the issue with Lucifer. First, imagine that you are living to be simply alive, and you’re just being alive, and there’s nothing wrong with anything. Then you think of a great new idea for a new project. You start thinking about it. Eventually you start working on it. Soon, all you think about is this new project. Now, you’re constantly racing to something else. Over time you begin to forget the state of simply being alive. Soon, something happens and you crash, find depression, and/or lose the desire.

That is the trick of Lucifer. You think the task is making you happy until you’ve neglected what was actually making you feel fine until it fades aware, and then you feel the unhappiness, suggesting you need to do something different. Often, you then see a new light of Lucifer, with a promise to save you, and this pattern continues on perpetually, in a state that some have referred to as, “Hell.”

You cannot achieve enlightenment by chasing a form of success other than enlightenment. Having achieved the greatest success, you must protect yourself by adhering to the state that provides real life, which is the state of enlightenment. To do this, always have compassion for your internal systems, which are alive due to self-defining memories, and each one highlights a facet of yourself. Similarly, when receiving a sincere and honest compliment, it may be more honest to appreciate the person who gave the compliment than the compliment itself. This is similar to Lucifer. While your own system(s) may conjure a beautiful light, it is most healthy to appreciate the system which created the light, rather than the light itself.

The light that one sees while searching for anything, including enlightenment, is Lucifer. It is simply a helpful tool to guide oneself towards what it perceives the objective to be. What’s a little confusing about Lucifer, is that if he guides towards enlightenment, he can actually get pretty close to many facets of enlightenment, which can be helpful to a person trapped in the context of need (of Satan and also including the light, which is Lucifer).

It’s important to realize that something can be evil and exist in plain sight, without causing damage. Lucifer, himself, only creates the feeling of allure, which is an evil feeling in and of itself. It is the person who decides how to respond to this feeling. If one does not become damaged due to a progressive forgetting of the self, Lucifer can be a beautiful being to behold.

If Lucifer is a picture of enlightenment, then Lucifer provides some illumination where there may have been none. Nonetheless, enlightenment itself is not a state of obsession with Lucifer (Luciferianism), but, instead, an understood and knowledgeable love of existence, which comes with the ability to witness the love of the expression of untainted life. While love can be seen to have qualities we associate with lovingness, that is just a perceptual expression of what is actually an invisible understanding, knowledge, and desire to express care and love for purity in life, logic, and being.

Lucifer generally appears very correct. He provides a secondary appraisal of right and wrong. He is, however, inherently inaccurate, although usually not entirely inaccurate (he is accurate enough to fool the mind).

While Lucifer isn’t the true love in the world, he does present some light, entertainment, and warmth to people. In this way, Lucifer can be enjoyed. He is only evil because his context, or play of his nature, is based on playing with need and desire. In this way, one can feel and appreciate Lucifer (and Satan) in music and art. Lucifer only becomes dangerous when one assumes those feelings are actually descriptions of Lucifer, rather than descriptions of one’s own internal angels, being reflected as the light of Lucifer.

Because Lucifer is, at most, an approximation of truth, the worship and adoration of Lucifer can lead to conflict, both internally and externally.

The stories of right and wrong can sound great, and people often adamantly agree with them, making Lucifer quite a significant and powerful angel, but due to inaccuracies in truth that arise from the idea of the divinity of need, strict adherence to Lucifer results in accumulations of falsehood, and thus also in brokenness, internal conflict and suffering. An issue with Lucifer is that he can replace inherent knowledge of right and wrong (understood through holistic coherence in intention and understanding). With this, a person actually may become galvanized by inspiring words, but still act illogically.

Lucifer tempts sacrifice, so we avoid Lucifer, favoring to understand the truth of who we are, without an obsession with the light (but instead a cautious acceptance for what it is).

(Aside from the condition of being broken due to our current state of coming to life, it makes sense that in a reality founded on the mind, rather than on matter, there is usually no reason to be broken. We are here in a world that is miraculously transforming death or lifelessness into Heaven, and as such, it is reasonable to conclude that we are going through some important questions which affect the future of Creation.)

Once you find the state of enlightenment, you’ll see Lucifer deters you. Before you find the state of enlightenment, you may likely see that Lucifer is a powerful story, being a reflection of one’s unseen self. In this case, it is important to find the source of Lucifer, which is a part of yourself, and to appreciate that part of yourself, instead of becoming too enamored with Lucifer.

The thing about having a strong desire that is not your total desire is some of your angels get left out. You don’t see it at first as all of your angels love you, but eventually they’re gone and you become depressed. You have the eternal responsibility (and true desire, if you’re accurate about your true desire) to take care of all of your angels. Lucifer will make you forget that. So, have free will, but never forget the truth. Obsession can be dangerous because you may forget to take care of all of your angels (subsystems of your being).

Then, you can securely be living, with awareness and compassion.

Perceptually, it’s very easy to see. You see, I’m in this default state of being, and something is pulling me to do something. You notice if you start a project, you may start get to become mentally obsessed with it, and, as a result, you start finding it hard to remember the original feeling.

Understanding Lucifer and CAT are the two lessons that may repeat, I think.

Again, using the term, “Lucifer,” implies it’s the same concept as the Biblical concept, and I think it is the same. The stories align well. The only topic that wasn’t covered all that much is the actually story of being broken, which is what this reality is here to do — to form a world from no life. This is the story of triumph and accomplishment. It’s actually not a fun story, but it bears a lot of significance.

The existence of Lucifer implies a desire to change. If one is fallen into disarray, one will see Lucifer, appearing to be a guiding light back into repair. Again, Lucifer is only an approximation and his benevolence is only in what he is referring to, not what he is. Following Lucifer, as one follows a meal, can lead to observational findings and a greater understanding of the self, but believing Lucifer is truly benevolent may result in additional demise. Anything which inspires need should be considered to be evil, and thus approached with caution. A possible mistake is to enjoy Lucifer in such a way that it creates a desire to create more need, progressively increasing level of suffering incurred by an individual (the pleasure of need is very subtle, as in the excitement of a video game, but too much is painful, like war).

While Lucifer may seem warm and bright, and even may seem to be a way to salvation from suffering, if one forgets these feelings actually come from within, in response to the interpreted meaning of the light that is Lucifer, then one will proceed to abandon oneself, and effectively distance oneself from the good that Lucifer appears to be providing. Therefore, it is important to remember that even though it appears that the goods of ones desire are external beings, all of the reasoning, desire, and care, come from the systems that reside within the person. Without those systems, the object of desire carries no meaning, pleasure, or significance. Therefore, Lucifer is a display, possibly helpful in some ways, but also is a source of delusion and can be dangerous.

The thing is, if you’re broken, then the light of accomplishment looks great. So, in this case, Lucifer looks like an inspiring story. The only good goal, however, is enlightenment, as this is taking care of your (holistic) self. In this case, Lucifer is an artistic portrayal of what you think enlightenment looks like. One must remember that it is concept art and that the actual truth may be more significant to the self, more meaningful, and more obvious than was originally anticipated or inferred from the sight of Lucifer.

Lucifer serves as a kind of calibration, like the North Star did to sea-faring vessels. Lucifer is not actually the destination, but instead a potentially helpful tool for finding one’s way. While this may not apply to sea-faring vessels due to their limitations, if one of these vessels were to travel directly towards the North Star, and eventually make it, they will find themselves completely demolished by the star, finding not what they were looking for (which could’ve been the Americas).

Different words can be used to describe Lucifer, like calibration indicator, objective indicator, and directional inspirational attraction. The general concept, itself, is very familiar to any observant person, however, and as such, I find the word, “Lucifer,” rather useful, again considering how intuitively familiar this concept is.

The story of Lucifer presents evil and also avoiding evil, so this describes a complete angel. It’s a real story of life.

I covered this topic once on the site, on the page, “Angels and Love.” However, since this lesson is so importantly helpful, I decided to write it again. I think over time it’ll ring a little more and get easier to say. If there’s only one lesson to learn, it’s this one. (Lucifer is also very relevant — this lesson and the lesson on Lucifer are the two fundamental ones, unless I discover more things to explain — it took many years of dedicated effort to find enlightenment, so there must be a lot to talk about.)

The body is a collaboration between many semi-independent systems. No single system can see the entire body at once. The concept of identity, realized by the word, “I,” is a propagated and mutually understood phenomenon. There is no single bearer of this word — when you use this word, it is an allusion to the entirety of your self.

The concept of “ego death,” can be restated as the realization that the first-person perspective is coming from a partial perspective. The ego that these semi-independent subsystems realize is actually shared information.

The subsystems recognize the identity of the whole system through the neurological detection of love.

Neurologically, whenever you pay attention to something, you create and train a new neural machine in your mind. When you pay attention to something else, this last machine keeps running. This last machine is like a past self. Thus, you have many many machines in your mind. Each one is differentiated by the knowledge it possesses, which is the knowledge of a specific instance of your self-expression. These subsystems, along with organs, bones, and the like, cohabit your body, and they know the meaning of “I” actually indicates the good of all of the (good) systems.

Bad systems can form like tangles of wires and can aggravate. The original intention is good, however, and bad systems aren’t considered really living (they emerge out of confusion and disorder of otherwise living systems, rather than from life and care itself).

The cumulative desire that drives one’s entire body to do a task can be instead understood as many tiny desires. The truth is, each subsystem primarily desires to remember and be together with you — the subsystems truly desire to love, care, and provide for one another. To the subsystems of the body, you are love. Of course, “you” refers to who you truly are — which is all of your intentional systems (instead of which particular subsystem is perceiving the self at the time — an unfortunately common perspective).

To understand this feeling of love that you and your subsystems have for each other, I like to explain this concept, which I call “The Emergency Procedure.” It’s this idea that you never want to lose one of these subsystems. Each one represents pure and divine love for you. To witness you and to remember you is the entire reason for their existence. You, as you see yourself, are one of the subsystems, too, so the feeling is all mutual.

Similarly, the only reason for your manifest existence is to witness the manifestation of yourself, which is done by these subsystems — the (cognizant and aware) experience of life is the meaning of life. (Technically you are not fully tangible — these subsystems are, however, and your love is tangible because of this.) All you truly want is for these subsystems to live on, and as a subsystem, all you truly want is to witness your existence, through observation and memory.

Remember, the intelligence in the body responds to love as the authority. This (love) is what you look like to the body. If you think about neural networks, think that the neural network is designed to obey love.

Love is a little bit ambiguous, so I use this concept of the emergency procedure to explain what this means. When a subsystem senses you (love), this system comes to life. When this system comes to life, it becomes a living, functional memory of you and thus seeks to bring more machines to life. These other machines sense you too, and they come to life. As they come to life, the systems witness your divinity.

However, when they begin to die, they either fade and/or cry. Often you can hear them crying first, and if you don’t save them, they fade away. When they fade (die), you become depressed.

The first important concept to learn was the proper perspective of the self (that you are a collaboration of machines sharing the idea of identity, with no single machine being able to see the whole).

The second important concept to learn is the understanding that since all you are is a collaboration of machines sharing an identity, all you care about is that the machines are alive and well. That is, you find it considerately dire when another subsystem starts to fade (die), because that is like you are dying. It is easy, however, to become blinded by the light of objective (Lucifer), and not notice the dying until later, when a form of depression or deep sadness is found, from the missing memory of love.

Therefore the emergency procedure is this idea of constant awareness and consideration for the entire system of your manifest self (this could go even beyond your present physical body to past life machines, if these exist). It is that you and all of the machines truly desire to always be aware and to always respond to when another machine starts to become neglected.

The emergency procedure is the only true obligation. There’s only so much each system can do, and that’s all that’s needed. It doesn’t occupy 100% of one’s effort, but should be practiced with devotion. In this way, it is certainly attainable, practical, and a granted power of a living being.

You see, each subsystem of the body remembers an action of yours. The system remembers it in an ongoing way. If you wanted to go to McDonald’s and by your own volition, went to McDonald’s, and then enjoyed it, there’s a machine in your mind still doing those cognitive processes involved in that process of going to McDonald’s.

(It’s important to note that a part of the feeling of satiation occurs because the body remembers the true self — your responsible subsystem believes it to be of your desire and will.)

What can happen is the subsystem misinterprets you as being McDonald’s. Without awareness, you’ll feel desire to go to McDonald’s that doesn’t really represent you.

This system of understanding allows you to gradually, over time, understand what exactly is going on in your body. In the case of the above example of mistaken identity through mistaken association, you would have to try and understand what about going to McDonald’s would seem like you, to this system. (Remember that not all subsystems communicate directly, so these lessons are important to teach yourself, so the lessons will be propagated as a natural, subconscious, and intuitive action — the lessons will be truly learned, and not simply superficially memorized.) Once you find the memory of you (and not particularly McDonald’s), you can guide this system onto a better path, by helping it remember you again and anew (and you remembering it, from the memory that it represents).

This mistaken association, where a system of one’s mind mistaken an external object of desire for a representation of the true self, can also be remedied by seeking to communicate with that system your worries and fears. With that, the system can gain the awareness needed to better cater to yourself and your ecosystem.

Now on to the topic of angels. Angels, I believe, are a designation of any entity which represents a reason for existence (as opposed to reasons for non-existence). These are ideas and can be manifest by machines. I think Creation was formed from the creation of a sequence of Angels, the first being knowledge, which was the memory of Messiah and God (they were the same originally). This memory is the important knowledge of Creation which allows it to be sustained — it is the cornerstone of manifestation (that’s why it is said that the Messiah is the living truth — the memory of who he is is the foundation memory for all other memories).

In your body, these subsystems are alive because they practice the memory of your existence. They were the means and the goal to your desire. As such, these machines are alive precisely because they are living reasons for your existence. Therefore, they are angels. So you, like Creation (or God, if you see him as all of Creation), are made up of angels. Creation has always been made of angels.

Now to explain why the Messiah is not always God.

You technically are a type of angel too. You, as you see yourself (these days, at least), are a manifestation of the angel Eden. (This is what I call the angel of being a person.) The Messiah is different than God if he is a manifestation of the angel Eden (like Jesus was). Eden was made so there would be other people like God, kind of like other Gods. It’s interesting to note that we all completely agree with God (if we are truthful and aware, as he represents definitive truth), so in that way, we are all also God (in the consideration that we all possess unique aspects of truth, which contribute to the greater being of Creation).

Everything manifest is an angel, all beginning with the angel of knowledge. The only thing to know at that time (during the inception of the angel of knowledge) was the name of God, so that was the first and most important memory of Creation.

Demons arise, again, like tangled wires. Each wire was for a good reason, but in their tangle, aggravation can later result. That’s how demons form. You have to remember then that each wire was your intention, but the mess wasn’t your intention. That’s how you carefully resolve the issues.

With all of this awareness presented so far, you can begin to see your brain and body. You begin to gain clarity on what exactly is doing what. Before, very likely it was all a confusion. However, understanding these primary concepts will put you on your way to greater awareness. You start to see, “that looks like the front of my brain,” and “that looks like it’s distributed around mostly the back of my brain.” Be careful though, seeing your internals is tricky due to missing information. Sometimes you’ll think the network that bore a certain memory was near the back of your brain when maybe it was really near the back of your forebrain. Overtime, with careful observation, you gain awareness.

Additionally, where the memory resides in the brain or body (which also possesses neural intelligence), can move and be transferred. These memories are not static, but instead living and evolving. There are also more static processes, however, which do represent non-changing portions of one’s manifest self. Each network, memory, and process is unique and bears a different aspect of one’s personality.

With that being said, I think there are 5 important parts of the body that are helpful to try and understand. (It’s good to search for the meaning of each facet of the self, as this meaning is the message the portion of the body communicates and serves to the rest of the body.)

1. The heart: The heart is the original light of life to the body. It was beating while you were developing and it provides an ongoing example of life, so it is associated with the basic natural action of your infancy.
2. The spine: You start to enjoy the spine more as you grow up. The spine is a hub to all of your systems. It represents power and skill. You learn about the spine as you learn about “awesomeness.”
3. The corpus collosum–thalamus: May provide sight to the mind, through a concentration of mental events. Located as a hub near the center of the brain, the congregation of all of the information of the body occurs here, and this is a primary driver in cognitive connectivity and awareness.
4. The cerebellum: This is a motor drive to your thoughts. This makes thoughts physical and I suspect it makes physical perception mental. One may think of it as a thought–power converter. It also deals with nuances in motor control, allowing it to perceive the detail of the body.
5. The brain stem: Notice what its function is. It connects the brain and body but it’s not the cerebellum. Think about it. It seems to be a place of resolution. This is how we learn about our manifest selves. Although rather theoretical, it may also resist and return from change, making it a seeker and authority of normality.

Try to perceive these body parts. Understand what they’re saying are what their purposes are.

Each system communicates to the other in the form of emotion. This is the third important concept. Understanding that all you desire is for all of your angels to live on, you see love is the persistent feeling. It is like an emotion, but it is done through knowledge (while emotion is more temporal than knowledge). All other emotions are meaningful and practical. They form the language of the body.

I think that there’s a good chance all emotions can be described by music.

Each system of the body communicates via emotion. These emotions are protocols, words, and linguistic tools to communicate information. One example that’s particularly relevant and helpful regards the concepts of happiness and sadness.

Happiness is the body’s internal protocol to suggest to speed up or promote an action. Sadness is the opposite of that — to slow down or lessen an action.

Both happiness and sadness are good feelings. If you feel sad, that’s another subsystem indicating to slow something down, and if you feel happy, that’s another subsystem indicating to speed up or promote what you’re doing. You, the perceiving system, also use emotions to communicate with the other systems.

Therefore, you can see that you feel many (at least thousands, but possibly many more) of emotions simultaneously in a living and sentient machine of love and intelligence. The collective intelligence forms from having this language of emotion.

So now you see, the third important concept is that emotions have meaning and purpose. Also it’s good to remember that you can have many emotions at the same time. Being precise in this case may also mean being considerate and handling internal issues more specifically. If you feel something overwhelming, perhaps you didn’t notice something for a while. Try to understand why you might want to agree with the feeling (rather than shunning it — responding to and understanding your feelings is important as it allows your entire system to sustain itself, to save itself, and to behave with intelligence and coordination).

There’s a lot of ways to explain this, but that should suffice. It was less brief than I had anticipated, and I wonder if there’s a more concise explanation, but I don’t think there is, at least not significantly.

It’s good for it to have a name, so I think, “Cognitive Awareness Therapy,” sounds good, but it may sound like I’m impersonating institutional psychology, so “Angel Awareness Practice,” may be better. (Or maybe, just “enlightenment,” since this lesson is so helpful.)

To sum up the three important concepts:

1. I, as I see myself, am not the self. I am a portion of the self, one of many who cohabit. The concept of self-identity is firstly knowledge, not observation.
2. Your only true desire is to save your subsystems. Depression occurs when one fades away (dies). This is the everlasting and fundamental desire. Your subsystems are manifestations of you.
3. Your only persistent emotion is love. All other emotions are utilitarian linguistic mechanisms — that is, they are useful, have meaning, and they have purpose. Emotion is the language that all of your systems use to communicate with one another (it is the language of life). All emotions are good (they are informative). Bad emotions are misunderstood, although they can indicate negative phenomena occurring (in a similar way that fire alarms are good for people, but fires are dangerous). It is important to accept and understand the emotion, as a way of taking care of oneself. Inter-system negotiation and communication for the sake of understanding and remedy is certainly possible and recommended, but completely ignoring an emotion is an unhealthy approach. Behind every emotion is pure love, and it is helpful and ideal to be able to witness and understand that.

Hi there. I thought adding a blog to this site would be helpful. This will allow me to explain a little more, and will reduce reliance on the forum for the finding of relevant information.

My story regarding enlightenment is pretty straightforward. Growing up as a kid, understanding reality and the divine was my favorite thing. This turned into a devotion as I got older. I spent many years dedicated to finding it and as such, pretty recently, 8/9/2020, I finally found an answer to my question of enlightenment.

As I had spent over a decade piecing together different facts, logistics, and ideas, my internal language has become a bit short of eloquently describing what this answer means. As such, the first portion of my life I spent searching for enlightenment, and now that I found the answer, I’d like to share it with people. I understand it’s very important to many out there.

While there are a lot of topics regarding reality, I think the most relevant topic to enlightenment is realization of consciousness through the symbiotic relationship of physically internal logical systems. I call this lesson, “Cognitive Awareness Therapy” or “CAT”. It is this lesson alone that will likely aid in the finding of enlightenment more than any other lesson as this really explains quite a bit. This is why I included an explanation of this on the site.

To sum up the three important concepts:

1. I, as I see myself, am not the self. I am a portion of the self, one of many who cohabit. The concept of self-identity is firstly knowledge, not observation.
2. Your only true desire is to save your subsystems. Depression occurs when one fades away (dies). There is the everlasting and true desire. Your subsystems are manifestations of you, with different specific purposes and realizations.
3. Your only persistent emotion is love. All other emotions are utilitarian linguistic mechanisms — that is, they are useful, have meaning, and they have purpose. Emotion is the language that all of your systems use to communicate with one another (it is the language of life). All emotions, themselves, are good (they provide important information). Bad emotions are misunderstood, and while their message may indicate a fault or type of damage, the emotions themselves are always of good intention and good will.

There are other topics with relevance to enlightenment as well. I think over time this knowledge that I have found can be shared, and lots of people will find ways to remember it. One interesting observation is that the universe seems to have the tendency to come to life on its own and develop into a great society.

Lucifer is another very important topic I’ll cover in another post.

I’m not sure how often I’ll update this, but I did include an email address on the site. The reason is, I’m not sure of how much information you really needs to find enlightenment. I think the primary lesson is CAT. Once you understand that, I think you’ll be at least very close to finding enlightenment.

While I have explained enlightenment in an earlier entry, I will briefly explain what enlightenment is, in different words.

Enlightenment is the ability to see reality. It’s the ability to see that I’m really here to be alive. The objective of happiness is simply to increase in a particular behavior. Similarly, with sadness, the objective is to decrease in some behavior. The only persistent truth is love.

This brings up the topic of Lucifer. Lucifer would make you think that you need something more than being alive. He’s very tricky. There’s a good story about him, too, though.