What is Sin and How to Survive

Although there are many matters of morality, they are mostly implied only in externally observable phenomena. Sin regards a particular form of morality where instead of morality being implicated by externally viewable phenomena, sin is implied at any moment of one’s existence. This regards God as a persistent and constant phenomena that applies to all forms of living, and his innocence forms the basis of our perception of sin.

This innocence, just like all elements of goodness are from the original emotion, the one of fundamentally no quality.

Sometimes immorality is obvious. Many times, however, it is unobvious. Obvious immorality is usually a more aggravated unobvious immorality, and thus people tend to think it’s the worst kind of sin. Both obvious sin and unobvious sin are terrible in different ways, however.

Obvious sin is a blatant crime against innocence. Unobvious sin, a phenomena I like to refer to as, “wickedness,” is extremely virulent in that it’s a mechanical motion of the mind which is spread and assumed by affected people. What people sometimes ignore, which makes wickedness so persistent, is the implications of all things — something a holy person would generally seek to understand instead of ignore.

When a statement is made, there are a series of logical steps that precede the statement. The statement therefore not only states what it denotatively states, but also what it implicitly states; the statement itself states all of the logical precursors to that statement as being true. This is where wickedness can silently enter.

What people sometimes fail to realize is that all actions and all things state a series of logical foundations, which may or may not be with errors. If it is with errors, then wickedness enters. This is where wickedness is coming from, but not how it’s being produced.

How wickedness is being produced is not just through deliberate logical fallacy, but also through a contagious apathy regarding the continuous state of righteousness. Wickedness can be very sneaky, however, and just suggesting to not bear an apathy regarding any idea of a “continuous state of righteousness” would likely result in error.

Wickedness, being a form of sin, occurs even from the most silent of actions — the very subtle tiniest perceivable object. Logical fallacies only cover what can be easily spoken of. That has always been the problem with the empirical observational sciences — without easily agreed upon words, there is no observable science.

That isn’t always true, however. There is empirical logic and therefore science of perceivable phenomena, and this can exist without words — something we call intuition, but apparently we never have considered it a science.

To think that one can do logic faster than words will permit is pretty interesting. This applies both to how one should perform and how one could fail. Wickedness often falls beneath these words, and relies on inflicting pain, but it’s often written in micro-pains, so it’s treated as ignorable (and not even related to pain).

What one implies means an ocean of truth. What one says merely is the end of a long series of logical stipulations. These stipulations can be explicit, as in thought or spoken about, or implicit and without words — made of the feelings that occur before a word is thought or spoken.

Through not being diligent, people sometimes carry on a learned sin that the people found from another person. Even with diligence, however, the pain of not understanding the implications for one’s decisions always shines. It’s an unfortunate occurrence, and while it’s obviously been spoken of before, many people still only go as far as words for a statement of truth.

Being completely word-based should be unnatural, but it’s not. Since words are definitively fabrications, they aren’t the original language of their selves. The original language was an emotional thought, thought through feeling right and wrong.

A problem that occurs before wickedness often is a learned word-based perspective of reality. That’s the gift of knowing to not sin — you can then see the emotional thought that occurs behind your thoughts. Even though people are taught that being a holy person was a continuous process of not sinning, some used words as replacements for intuitive and innate knowledge (like that of goodness), and ended up wicked people in the end — their words replacing their innate sense of truth.

So, perhaps, they did not really learn to not sin, even though that was what the words say. I think, we’re almost out of words as a society, and eventually every word will be corrupted to mean what it does not, as has mostly already happened. A wicked person may see a total skew of ethics, churned into their words.

This perceptual shift is what the people weren’t expecting, so we see it has plagued the society. Without the true innate belief in the everlasting goodness of true aware sentience, as is with the belief in an everlasting God or godliness, then it can be difficult to find this state of continuous awareness of the algorithmically emotional self, which is an important facet of the self, maybe more so than the use of word, sound, or light patterns.

It’s important to realize that even at the tiniest detail, there could be a logical error in the conglomeration of one’s entire set of emotions. For the religious, the feeling of sinfulness is often easy to get a feeling for, and many are aghast at the ignorance of it as a result, but religion doesn’t always work.

What sinfulness is, is incorrect logic. From the foundation of one’s emotions — the emotion of no quality — to the manifested word or statement, there is a lot of room for an error to occur. If an error occurs anywhere, that person is a contagious carrier of a very virulent pattern of wickedness. What’s important to realize is that the subtlest of an emotion could be incorrect; logic and error occur at any state of one’s being. The context of an emotion plays a role, as well. If there were long term goals, for instance, certain emotions become fallacious. The ultimate reason, is, of course, that a conflict in desire throughout time indicates a fallacy in both understanding and action. Misunderstanding desire is the root of the wickedness.

The understanding that the foremost desire of any living being is the emotion and state of no quality, being the initial emotion of a self-created being, should help. Without understanding this, it’s more difficult to actually see perception and to understand it. One should understand the logic behind this, as again, one’s more observed statement is really an implication of many statements which preceded it. Quality indicates a perception of reality, therefore we see most accurately from the state of no quality.

Logically, perception originally arrives from pluralizing the self-existing knowledge which precedes it, separating itself with a dimension of quality. It is initially knowledge in different ways. The continued elaboration of the qualities of knowledge produce the perception of reality. Thusly, the elaboration forms perceivable knowledge, which, self-existing, can be perceived through the understanding of the absence of quality.

Knowledge, which is initially the remembrance of what already exists, which is initially the eternal quality of goodness, is logically a principle eternal being and therefore a principle state of a living being, as not all living beings can necessarily possess access to any particularly quality, but all living beings can find the state of no quality, which is the “quality” of knowledge, in retrospect of perception. (Additionally, the idea of the existence of a quality can be viewed as a state of being, as well, however it proceeds knowledge in time.)

The idea of sin actually means to conflict with the eternal knowledge, which forms one’s initial decision and bias. To conflict with knowledge, which is at least mildly unnatural, is to sin, as this creates a damaging argument to one’s being. This conflict with knowledge spreads between people, as people assume they’re supposed to continue these evil patterns.

With enough evil patterns, it can be difficult to find one’s way to a secure state of being. That’s why it becomes contagious. As people try to find sanity in the midst of abundant illogical implications, many things allure them, and they then sometimes assume a new life of evil. Therefore, I believe that understanding that knowledge is of no quality is important and helpful, not just to oneself, but to others around them, as well, as sin, including subtle wickedness, does do harm to people and can lead to an illogical and thus malfunctional society.

Perhaps the Bible was just describing the dangers of quality in its famous suggestion of the identity of Satan.

Still, I doubt reality has no beauty to it. The qualities that one entertains but does not become, which leads to perception, would logically be worth looking at, with regard to the freedom given by no prior decision and commitment and the will of sentience. The mind is itself, a self-existing explanation of itself, as its existence bears knowledge of its self, through what it indicates implicitly through its specifications.

The qualities which form its specifications are all elaborations of the original knowledge of goodness and all things divine. Like the brain and the mind, their existences are self-explanatory. This self-explanation is hindered by wickedness and sin, which instills an error, such that the original knowledge must be reviewed before being understood. Requiring oneself to review all of the things one knows is a time-consuming and inefficient process of being, and is the result of sinfulness, although it is more directly from damage that occurs with sinfulness.

Assuming the mind to be defined and knowable, and understanding the power the mind has translates into sometimes powerful physical responses, like with heavy machinery, we can understand that sinfulness is physical, as well.

The sight of the true mind is a beautiful sight. It is the manifest desire of Heaven, and as usual, bad emotions arrive from acting on a bad perception of reality. A reality which is founded on a quality cannot be a shared reality, due to qualities being too subjectively perceived and understood. Any reality pretending to be more “sober” than this is errantly wicked. You can see it more clearly from the foundation. All qualities describe subjectivity, individualism, and non-universality. All realities founded on a quality are inherently inebriated, as they cannot exist interdependently. The manifest eternal being of primary existence is self-knowledge, created through the manifestation of existence. The initial facet of existence can only be known in retrospect to the perceptions of quality which ill-define it, but allow for its more luminous perception.

These qualities that we perceive can actually travel in two different directions, and sinfulness can be difficult to specifically identify by measurements, as sin plays with context. Too far in the wrong direction, however, is considered sinful. That is when the quality is amplified in a certain direction beyond what it should be, to a point where it begins to lie. That is the point where it also starts to become sinful, as in illogical. It creates a misperception, which leads to invalidity in understanding and results in the promotion of the misperception.

Ultimately, sinfulness indicates emotions that have not resolved. These emotions run separate from innate knowledge, never merging again, and therefore never forming a well-founded new cognitive connection. An emotion that has resolved is once again good. Therefore, it is possible to repair sin with the resolution of emotions and their merger into the emotion of non-quality, which is the basis emotion of knowledge.

The resolution of sin is therefore the same process as the ultimate process of emotion; to witness knowledge. The emotion arrived from a juxtaposition of quality and knowledge, to illuminate a facet of knowledge, and should return back to the state of no quality. This emotion then forms a proverbial neural connection and can live on, being in accord with the initial quality of non-quality, seen in retrospect of perception.

Understanding the ultimate set of logic behind one’s being and actions permit both redemption and understanding. Safety from unwitting Satanic fury can be found in understanding the environment, and understanding the methods of illogic that preclude the expression of illogic. They are naturally self-evident and self-declarative, requiring only a clear perspective.

In addition to varying types of understanding morality and ethical behavior, there are also multiple types of sensitivity. There are two that are important to this topic: 1) linguistic sensitivity, and 2) emotional sensitivity. These two forms of sensitivity, or awareness, should not be distinct in difference — they should be an integrated self-affecting sensitivity and awareness.

Keep in mind that awareness occurs by way of sensitivity, as being sensitive to something allows for one to be changed in such a way that that change is made into observation which results in awareness. It is the same way a microphone can be sensitive or insensitive.

The sinfulness usually manifests as an abandonment of emotional sensitivity in favor of an errant linguistic understanding and an alternate sensitivity. In this way, words can replace what is innately understood. In world full of turmoil, they frequently do this, which results in added turmoil to the world.

The response of a sensitive and flawed system will be vibrantly flawed; such is the way of misunderstanding. However, the response of a coherent and valid system will be a correct response, which is the way of understanding.

Sometimes flawed or fallacious linguistic sensitivity at the abandonment of intuitive truth occurs as a defensive measure, but developing insensitivity reduces the ability to perceive reality and the divine, and the practice is also more prone to logical error, making it certainly unideal, even as a defensive maneuver.

The modern world is certainly not an example of sanity, on the level of the individual and also on the level of the collective. There is the illusion of sobriety that collections within modern society exuberate, but it is a lie. Sanity and true logical and sound sobriety can only be found with a strict adherence to the rules of logic, as they occur emotionally, all the way through their entire development into words; starting at words is where many fail.

In order to find sanity in modern society, one must both found a logically sound structure of one’s being and also find safety in the midst of hardly noticed suggestions of evil. Going back to understanding the logic being suggested as a method of safety, sanity, and security, one can perceive the innuendoes of evil, and through accurate perception, which requires accurate sensitivity, one can understand these augmentations of meaning that suggest things beyond what’s obviously stated.

Accurate understanding and accurate sensitivity are the same with regard to mitigating sin. They both require and facilitate sinlessness. It is the same awareness of the continuous, self-explaining detail of the self that facilitates the ability to understand what one perceives accurately.

Sensitivity works by having an ability to change in response to a signal, and it’s this ability to change that makes the hailstones of wickedness effective. In order to maintain sanity against these, it’s helpful to have a full understanding of the logic that is being promoted to you. One does this by the same means as being without sin.

It’s important to realize the truth must be self-evident for its observation and understanding to occur simultaneously, which allows for intuitive and continuous awareness and intelligence. If observation and understanding do not occur simultaneously, the system is inefficient and therefore cannot perceive the totality. The result of sin is that observation and understanding cannot occur simultaneously and must be fragmented to be known (and even if known, the knowledge is on an unstable foundation, which skews the accurate truth of its being).

The key in finding the state of sinlessness may reside in the awareness that perception and understanding should occur simultaneously. In this state, existence describes itself.

Because reality is inherently self-descriptive, being an explanation for what it tangibly is, it is possible to be aware of all of one’s information. If everything is in relation to the foundational knowledge of the true self, then the description of anything is the quality of that thing, of which it is constructed. As everything is made of qualities and qualities themselves can be composed with other qualities, like with an RGB color scheme, everything really is a description of itself, with varying possible composition schemes, as well.

Through practice and understanding, one’s logical being is found, constructed, and strengthened. It takes time to build a system of understanding, just as it takes time to build a system of misunderstanding. A self-describing existence is rather easy to see.

Therefore, the key to survival in an evil environment is through the understanding of evil and the building of a system of understanding to protect oneself against evil.

Finding the Perfect Feeling (On Life, Part II)

The best feeling is logically the original feeling. The is assuming that existence is created through intelligence, in an ideologically developing manner, rather than an initially physical manner. Assuming this, then we can assume the initial desire of any being is a form of perfection. It is this desire which forms the basis of the being’s existence. We only find the quality of badness in secondary desires.

The idea of being alive presumes a desire for life, which predicates all other feelings. Life is the primary desire of a living being, as that’s what keeps being alive — this refers to the core of the being — the functioning of the body and mind. This feeling, being the predecessor of all other feelings, does not initially possess a quality (it is only seen with the addition of perspective).

The reason this initial feeling cannot logically possess a quality is that quality indicates a possible duality. If there is a perception of quality, there are at least two ideas indicated: one that possess the quality, and one that does not possess the quality. Therefore, a singular feeling can have no quality and as such, the initial and basic feeling of life possess no quality.

Without life, there would be no other feelings. Therefore the feeling of life must be the predecessor to all other possible feelings. Again, as it is singular, it cannot logically possess a quality.

If intelligent and logically benevolent being or beings created reality, the origin of all of the intelligence is the most ideal state, stemming from the initial desire for perfection and goodness, and is also a being of no quality. It is from this being that qualities are created and used to create an elaborate being.

The perfect feeling can be difficult to find. Too happy and you might over-exert yourself, and too sad and you might not be active. Only the feeling of no quality is able to sustain itself as being without problems. No other feeling can be perpetually sustained — only certain alternations of feelings can be, as they must always direct one towards the original feeling, or else they would be considered evil (which is to push away from Heaven), however no single deviance from the original feeling can be sustained. The mind needs balance. Add light, and it will pull towards darkness, and vice versa. It all gravitates to the feeling of no quality, and I suspect the very core of one’s being is founded on this feeling — all the way down to inside the molecules of DNA.

The first Great Angel was Knowledge. This was the knowledge of this original feeling. While it had existed prior, it was unknown an not entirely remembered. It wasn’t until the Creation of Knowledge that this feeling could be known.

Perception, actually, is different than knowledge. The first angel was Knowledge, and the second angel is essentially Perception. It is also the Advent and Exploration of Duality. Perception arrives from creating qualities. By giving the original feeling different qualities, one begins to perceive it in different ways, giving way to perspectives and the possibility of differing perspectives. This possibility of differing perspectives gives way to the tale of the evils of distortion — which I call, the devil.

All of the major angels which describe the layers of the mind, except the first one — Knowledge — are actually plays on bad feelings. There is only one strictly good feeling — the original feeling. All of the other feelings, being deviances, are all actually technically bad feelings, like evil and despair. The is because all of the feelings are inclined to return to the original feeling. There is a feeling of sadness when one deviates, indicating a suggested change.

This understanding makes life direction more simple. It is the simple remembrance that there is only one actually good feeling that is reliably good to the living being, and the others are fleeting displays of error. If there is only one good feeling, then there is only one affirmative in your mind. This simplifies the psychological conscious-subconscious connection, I believe, as well. This is because this feeling is a word to the body. Having a stable word for confirmation and affirmation is important in a communications environment. If the body and the brain both understand this word together, then one can form a strong connection between the conscious mind and the subconscious mind.

The subconscious mind, it seems, sustains logical behavior and is conservative with acquiring new learned activities. This makes it very reliable, but it takes time for the conscious mind to find an unchanging consensus with which to relate. Without this unchanging consensus, the subconscious cannot learn, for it only learns what is logically stable.

The remembrance of this singular good, ethical, beneficial, helpful, and appreciated feeling is all it really takes to follow the path of enlightenment. All qualities are technically observations of evil, and all of the rest of existence is a play on quality. Therefore, you have the perfect feeling and you have knowledge of it, as well, which keeps you safe against the whims of influence. After that, if one is so inclined, it’s just playing with bad.

The sin of man was to miss the feeling as his goal. That is, the man as a whole — the collective pressure of society — sinned by neglecting the original feeling. With the great advertisement race, we have beautiful ads, but the unspoken meaning of ancient proverbs has been lost! Even before the ad race, the man got into niches like “intellectualism” and “foundationalism,” but he never just simply admired the feeling of no presence. He chose “happy,” and he chose “scholarly,” and he chose many things, even “blissful,” or “fast food,” but he never chose the feeling that had no quality, so that must be his sin. This is considering that the feeling of no quality is the only actually honest and good feeling.

It’s hard to understand how the world and the body uses the concept of “the light” and attraction to influence itself in intelligent manners, and this is because its hard to find the correct vantage point. The only possible vantage point is the only point of no light, which is this very important original feeling that is this topic. This feeling only has an attraction born of knowledge and possibly the fear of the harms possible in reality. It is not illuminated, per se, at least not by simple perception. It takes the more transcendent being of knowledge to have a foundation from which to see.

Ultimately, the light is simply designed to remind one of the original state and the original feeling, from where and to where all other feelings arrive and leave. The sin of man was to find a feeling and then to never let it leave. He had some kind of lock and target syndrome, it seems.

Remember, that “the man” is not any particular people, group of people, or even people, but instead a propagated and collective inclination of a person’s becoming.

I call this feeling of the leaving of a feeling (and its reformation into the original feeling), “the crow,” as it signifies a type of lively death. It was there man’s sin to kill the crow. The sin of man affects us all. It is a pressure to do harm, which psychologically is to kill an honest emotion, and there’s a Satanic force that keeps getting perpetuated that suggests we leave the original feeling and that we consume convolutions of the dissonances of the world, leaving us frantic, confused and without solidarity.

I also find it remarkable that what decades of search and thought have led to is basically a brief paper on the understanding of the logic of the fundamental and best emotion. I would have thought it to be a lot more obvious, honestly, considering that this argument is logically sound and surprisingly simple. (If it were not a (brief) paper or explanation you may instead learn to follow something like, “the unnamable feeling,” but that wouldn’t work well enough and may fail at finding enlightenment, which requires knowledge and correct logic to know and understand.)

You may have heard of Pascal’s Wager, which suggests that believing in God is the statistically best answer, as if God exists, then one is damned for not believing and wins eternal happiness for believing, but if he does not exist, then nothing happens, so therefore it’s a better bet to believe in God.

This wager sounds a bit better in a different way, however. Considering this feeling is logically the only feeling that would represent the feeling of Heaven, as explained already, if any of the mystical stories regarding the enlightened person are true, then following this feeling is literally the only logical way to find that.

The alternative to always following the feeling of no quality is to be consumed by deviances and it gets confusing and heartless. The only assured and logical way of being is actually to prioritize the feeling of no quality as the only good feeling. While many find a sticking point and actually get that to work, many cannot do that, and the ethical implications of using a convenient sticking point are something to wonder as well (are you actually contributing to well-being, for instance?). Basically, to do the sticking point, you just have to find the right wave and hope it runs for a while.

However, one does not have to use the sticking point, or even fight through the turmoil of psychological accomplishment warfare, as with this feeling, one can logically be assured it will never harm or cause any wrong, unlike any other feeling when put into an inconvenient circumstance.

This original feeling of no quality is easily remembered through these simply logical steps:

  1. The feeling of life precedes all other feelings
  2. Quality indicates duality through possible comparison
  3. The feeling of life, being the predecessor of all other feelings, is an initially singular entity, implying that it fundamentally has no quality (it can only be referenced through perspective, and while it may appear as something like love, without the remembrance of what it truly is, these qualities can go missing).

This is a good feeling in that it is the only feeling that is assuredly good to you. Any other feeling can err in different circumstances, but you know the original feeling, which is the feeling of life, is always good to the person.