Blog

The context of need is a good definition of evil. Any story, game, or circumstance that involves the context of need, involves evil. There are three aspects of this context. The first one is called, “Satan,” and is the general game or play of need — representing the context of need, itself.

One may be hesitant to use these words. One may argue that we don’t necessarily know the true meaning of these words as they are mildly archaic, and their original meanings may be, today, ambiguous. However, considering the simplicity and description of evil, they are rather fitting, accurate, and quite useful. Their historic awareness and almost mysterious power to evoke remembrance may be beneficial to the mind, which perceives these known meanings, even if they are not entirely explicit.

These words are pretty important in our minds, so it’s nice that we may be able to use them in our scientific and concrete understanding of enlightenment.

All of the demons are born of these forces. Let’s describe them:

The devil is corruption. This causes misrepresentation, leading to misinterpretation, while Lucifer is external objective. The keys here are 1) accuracy in information, and 2) accuracy of focus.

Satan, technically speaking, uses the allure and attraction, which is Lucifer, to generate a system of need and fulfillment. Satan is known to temp people from a true path, in part, by using appealing imagery, and, in part, by distorting what exists. Satan, himself, isn’t the source of Lucifer, and Lucifer isn’t his own source, either. The light is simply an echo being reflected in a way that is likely truncated, and also possibly distorted. The light, itself, being of a message of truth, is not evil. The implied evil in Satan causes damage is its misinterpretation, which can possibly result in untruthful actions, if one is not aware of what the light truly means. That is, if one simply sees the light, not understanding truly its meaning, then the context of need can possess one’s body, as if they were possessed by Satan, himself, which results in one deviating from a truthful path.

I have noticed this phenomenon in my mind occurs because the imagery looks like what is desired, although not exactly the same, and mistaking these cues for something else causes problems. The context of need can manifest in different ways. Lucifer generally guides the path of need, but the light may be interpreted in corrupt form, resulting in the reception of corrupt information, which complicates understanding.

Lucifer is said to posses the desire for continued greatness, so much that he one day becomes even greater than God; at least he thinks that. The delusion of foreseeable impossible greatness is a common characteristic of Lucifer. The problem with Lucifer, is that he looks at accomplishment instead of the self. He doesn’t see the absurdity of being greater than ultimate.

I think it’s good to think be aware of the real meaning of the word, “ultimate,” as it’s a useful descriptor to understand clearly.

What Lucifer sees is a bright light, outside of his reach. He obsesses, at least a bit, becoming willing to sacrifice portions of himself, to experience pain, to reach this light. He doesn’t see the light was just a motivational mechanism generated by his own mind. He learns to hate himself, thinking “the pain will be worth it.”

What’s paradoxical about Luciferianism, is that it’s not a good way to find success. The maxim that goes something like, “hard work brings success,” is a dangerous lie. Not only does it damage you, being damaged while working is less productive (and even more so if the process is a continuously compounding continuous pattern, bringing even feelings of worthlessness).

Why does this occur? The answer lies in CAT, (or, “the third state”). This topic has been addressed before, but to recapitulate, the body is made of many subsystems working together with different ways and memories, all for the same name.

When you prioritize something, the body begins doing that, even subconsciously, when it has the opportunity, as it is something that is good to do. You’re filled with lots of good things to do, going on all of the time. Now when you see the light of Lucifer, and you’re ready to give it your all, to leave all other thoughts behind, to break through all obstacles, to overcome all challenges, what’s happening is only a portion of your mind actually wants to do that, and perhaps the rest are willing to go along, for a least a moderate while.

However, as your past priorities get ignored, pressure builds up to tend to them, and many times that pressures wins; you then feel less energy, but often times, the allure of perseverance simply indicates a fallible belief that Lucifer still can do it.

Eventually either the majority of your systems revert to past behavior, to tend to those priorities which define you, or things start breaking. As an effect, you start feeling less well, less awake, less able to continue. Either way, you become unable to do the task.

It’s not only that, by that point, Lucifer often has caused some damage with the notion of sacrifice, and so perhaps you’re burdened by depression.

Remember, depression signifies that an angel of your system (a subsystem of you) has died and is missing. This means that the memory that it once carried — a memory of your livelihood — is no longer active and is no longer being remembered or represented. Depression seems almost certainly curable (sadness will still exist as an intelligent emotion) through the process of paying attention to yourself, happy or sad, intelligently and with compassionate awareness — in order to resurrect the living memory that has become inactive. Common are tears of joy or laughter in the resurrection of a subsystem of the self (which is a type of angel, or messenger of life). (When an angel is threatened or dying, tears of sadness may be felt. Again, listening, with intelligence, awareness, and compassion, can resolve the issue. The worst thing you can do is ignore yourself, as that is what causes the death of these living memories of self-existence. This means to understand the sadness and respond in an aware and considerate manner. Remember that your personal perspective is also a subsystem, specializing in a type of awareness.)

How do we find success without becoming Luciferian and falling for what is like a scam?

Lucifer is the phenomenon of the existence of what becomes an imposter upon its misunderstanding. The joy and love in life all comes from the same source. It emanates from your initial expression of the self, which is an expression of life. With the desire to change in order to fulfill a destiny, one’s self expresses joy in response, and one projects the light of accomplishment ahead of oneself.

If one replaces the true joy in life with the light of Lucifer, then one has corrupted the knowledge of the self, which is the first state. In this case, Lucifer impersonates the knowledge of the self. Since Lucifer is an object in the context of need, this creates the perception that the self must be attained, and in the midst of Lucifer, this perception can become true, as the knowledge of the self and thus its remembrance becomes lost.

You understand yourself as knowledge. Secondly, you understand yourself as a duality, expressing the various perspectives of knowledge. And thirdly, you understand yourself as a diverse collaboration of active (and living) memories. All three of these fundamental states of the mind can become damaged by misunderstanding Lucifer.

The first state solves the desire for singular objective. The modern person is physically and naturally familiar with singularity of objective. Lucifer is tricky in the context of singularity of objective, as Lucifer appears to be the objective, while only actually referring to it. Through various naturally incorporated systems, which may include the stomach, spine, and brain stem, an individual naturally is inclined to be aware of a state of singularity. Upon the presence of two competing states of singularity, the mind may experience a form of agony.

The second state avoids oneness by being two diverged interpretations of the singular knowledge of the first state. This divergence may be noted in the separation of the left brain from the right brain, but more fundamentally occurs whenever there is the concept of comparison. Referring to the brain’s dualistic structure, involving partially separated hemispheres, it’s interesting to note that neither side, on their own, may know the pronunciation of words — it seems it may take the agreement of the disparate perspectives to find a represented of the more holistic self, resulting in a singular agreement on the pronunciation of an idea into a word or words. Enunciation is the singularity in this perspective.

The third state also avoids the pit of unobtainable singularity (the mouse and cheese method) through the realization and understanding that your personal self-perspective is only one of many subsystems of the self and of the body, each a living memory of your deliberate existence. All of these systems communicate with one another to manifest the intangible and perfect self. No one system knows all about the self, and it takes care and awareness to be true to the self, which and who is known and learned of.

(Before taking offense at my calling the self a thing, I say the word, “which,” with reference to the same notion as the notion of the body being a divine thing, recalling that being a divine thing is a nice (and curious) feeling which promotes awareness of the literal and manifest self.)

Think of the third state as a society of living beings, all devoted to a single person’s will. They cannot directly see this person, but they understand this person over time as they become more resembling of the invisible identity.

These three fundamental states of cognition, knowledge, duality, and plurality, avoid Lucifer when known correctly.

You can be successful without 1) beating yourself up, 2) extending yourself beyond your means, 3) violating yourself with abrupt, substantial changes in demands, 4) forgetting that every moment of your willful existence is a divine treasure that needs to be sustained and appreciated for healthy existence.

I know this is a common saying in this archive, a recurring motif, if you will, yet, it still applies, and that means to not let your (naturally living) memories die. When you do something, the brain learns not an impression, but an action, and it continues to support and perform this logical action, perpetually. This neural subsystem that was formed in that process sees you as perfect and always wants to do what you were once doing, because it was you. When you disregard the self, by disregarding these memories, you find sadness and death.

There are people out there who are half alive; this is not uncommon; and that’s the real tragedy.

Zombism is a societally uncured, very common, and potentially curable psychological disorder with physiological implications. Zombism is almost certainly the root and cause of depression. 

If a person is literally not fully alive (their neurology presents meaningless functionality), they are a zombie. It’s real. (Zombie fever).

Returning to the topic of avoiding Luciferianism in a practical way.

Success is wonderful. Be naturally moving forward. The greatest achievers, almost always, at the very very least, enjoyed what they were doing. Better than, “work hard,” is to work with appreciation of life. To achieve something, feel free to feel the wind of Satan’s allure, but keep oneself together, in awareness and care.

There is an assumption that working necessarily requires hardship. It is that the definition of working, itself, is not something that’s generally possible to do without receiving payment. Reminiscent of a mouse on a wheel, chasing an unattainable piece of cheese, while also avoiding the treacherous likes of death, the system of “work hard to win” is ignoring the fact that if working was what you would do if you could do anything, then the suffering related to work would dissipate. There’s, perhaps, a notion of necessary sacrifice, and I think this notion may be understood, sometimes, with a dangerous attitude. The idea is to enjoy life while also making life enjoyable, in general. Worshipping Lucifer nearly destroys the point of life, anticipating a point where life is accommodable, but not experiencing the joy that is currently ongoing.

The danger of Lucifer is that the inherent joy of life gets lost in a delusion of accomplishment. This delusion stems originally from an expression of the beloved self, but upon false understanding, becomes an evil overlord of desperation and dissatisfaction.

If one can achieve an ability to maintain their initial state of happiness, that is known at the introduction to existence, then one would find work to be, perhaps, a more joyous opportunity to experience the self experiencing life.

The initial expression of existence is of truth and love. It is when this expression gets communicated that it may experience forms of distortion or corruption. This occurs with the worship and obedience to Lucifer, the light of objective. Lucifer is supposed to be alluring, as it represents a directionality that one’s self desires. However, forgetting that Lucifer is not the source of his brilliance leads one to chase essentially nothingness.

Because the practice of obedience to Lucifer occurs secondarily to the initial expression of life, it would seem that as people grow up from children, Luciferianism is taught to them, and thus later in life, issues concerning one’s meaning and place with regard to the experience of life become apparent, manifesting in forms of meaninglessness, loss, and depression.

Since we have had, as a society, no utilizable method of maintaining safety in the midst of Satan, the Devil, and Lucifer, the communicated inclinations towards Luciferianism (and thus Satanism, as it seeks to promote the feeling of need) are damaging to the unguarded soul. Therefore, as one may observe, much of the world adores Lucifer, effectively increasing the erraticism of Satan, and, additionally, increasing suffering from various resulting ailments.

Lucifer is often a warming presence. To avoid the damages that his contingency of need implies, one should always be aware of their own life, such that one can understand Lucifer in the context of the truth, rather than blindly following him into depressing and possibly antagonizing self-fragmentation.

Even when your ship, so to speak, is traveling along with the winds of Lucifer, perhaps in search of a form of accomplishment, one can remain psychologically well by remembering from where the aspects and the generation of the light of Lucifer truly originate.

(Any deviance will lose its appeal over time. In order to move towards a goal, one must stay near oneself, such that the entirety of one’s will is in agreement. Otherwise, a task which inspires perhaps a glamorous deviance will ultimately lead to boredom. Deviances should be approached with caution, but it is possible to safely entertain them, so long as one does not find self-segmentation. Deviances can potentially work harmoniously with one another, if one is responsible in their actions, which result in psychological programs to occur ongoingly. In this way, the evil beings that may be dangerous can be possibly appreciated and enjoyed, but it takes a level of awareness and a sort of aptitude regarding them.)

Just whatever you do, beware of the light, which may lead one into a tunnel of external ambivalence, which segments and blinds the self from the self.

Returning to the more overarching topic of Satan.

How do we avoid Satan?

Satan is the context of need. Satan’s story lives through a type of distortion, which can result in misunderstanding. The distortion indicated by Satan is that one does not possess what the person wants, but can potentially possess it upon a form of payment. This is a commonly known pattern of the world, and it is a pattern present in the ways of the mind. However, it presents an illusion, which creates a distortion in understanding, as it does with our modern and highly ambiguous definition of love. If love is a form of excitement, as is frequently portrayed, then it is impractical, as excitement naturally fades, being a deviation from the integral self. The result? Illusory, false, and thus cheap, love, like a necklace without a soul or bracelet with a distasteful shine.

I say, “cheap,” because we understand price to be significant of importance. That’s the effect of Satan. By construing love and excitement as the same emotion, masses of people jump to it, but are left with… unimportant love. The joy of the highest standard is the initial joy, therefore, one possess already the highest love.

Similarly to how magic tricks vary and can use some of same techniques, while still being individually identifiable, the tricks of Satan also vary and can overlap in their methodology. These tricks of Satan, also living with the general flow and tendency of life and consciousness, can be referred to as demons.

Internally, it’s important to notice when you jump to a relatively far away bias of cognition. Accuracy of information is a priority, which entails accurate understanding and communication. It’s good to teach this to all of your systems, and they too should continue on the knowledge. If only your system responsible for perceiving information learns something, it may not become well learned. For something to be well learned, a holistic understanding of the material should be cultivated. Otherwise, you may only partially accomplish understanding.

One can consider Lucifer and the Devil to be demons of Satan. After all, they all function through the misrepresentation of achievement. It looks like achievement, but it also looks like a desire to sacrifice one’s psychological integrity.

Hopefully this explains evil.

There are three primary perspectives, or states, of the mind. The first is the most commonly known; it is the state of singularity present with true knowledge (this is the common feeling of knowing God). This is the state which provides us our sanity.

Skipping the second for now, the third state of mind is the state of many beings, all congregating in the remembrance of a singular idea or ideology. This I call, “the state of many,” or, more simply, the number “3.”

The second, which is the topic of this post, is the state of duality. This state, along with the third state, seems to be a novel frontier or our collective awareness, although we may have been more aware in the past. They are important and mark a time in our history when we are moving on to thinking about new facets of reality; our history has been filled primarily with finding the first state, while entertaining other notions.

This state of duality manifests in many ways, one of them being the existence of two brain hemispheres, connected on a relatively small area, by the corpus callosum.

Each hemisphere of the brain is like an independent brain. Each one is fairly drastically different than the other, as is a fairly common belief. Generally, we believe the left side of the brain to carry a distinctly greater affinity toward analytical thinking, while the right side of the brain carries a distinctly greater affinity for artistic or aesthetic thinking.

They both carry the same knowledge of the self (assuming you have found resolute singularity), but they carry out the will which is supposed by the knowledge in ways rather alien to one another. Each hemisphere of the brain is a different personality of yourself. Internally, you have two personalities — right and left.

(Remember, according to science, the right brain controls the left side, and the left brain controls the right side. These understandings from science are wonderful for calibrating your perspective. When understanding your internal self, the process of depiction can be a tricky one, so having references is useful.)

This brings me to what I think is the best calibration tool and technique for remembering duality and finding the resolution of a common type of neural headache — congestion in the midbrain.

Remember, there is a gap between your hemispheres. It is here that there must naturally be a pronounced deviance. Remember that what deviates is the subjective and personable interpretation and implementation of the knowledge of the self — the definition of personality.

You have two personalities, and they agree at the connection of the hemispheres, for instance, at the corpus callosum (and related networks), and the voice (in singularity). The corpus callosum is like a glistening communications environment, where important words are found and realized. The corpus callosum and associated networks are paved by important words and their pronunciations.

At the corpus callosum, the voice the two hemispheres and the two sides of the body come together in an agreement and harmony. The voice sounds the patterns of the agreement between the hemispheres, and resolution-oriented and collaborative facilitation-oriented networks, for understanding and awareness, facilitating exchange, resembling a commercial interchange.

A benefit of practicing the practice of duality — with one of the possible practices including the realization and understanding that internally you are two brains with the same name but in different ways, is that you can find a way to reduce possible congestion at your midbrain. Midbrain congestion is a likely source of cognitive headache and difficulty. Through understanding the similarities and differences that reside in one’s brain, one can more comfortably understand the resolution process that occurs, not only in the brain, but in various aspects of the resolution of identity, perhaps shifting more subjective phenomena further from the center of the brain.

That and remembering the gap in your mind may be powerful. (It interesting and perhaps helpful to remember that there are no neurons in most of the middle of the brain.)

Continuing with physical and corporeal examples, the lungs are an example of duality, being rather disconnected from other body parts and each other — being fairly independent. Convening and realizing the thoughts and/or emotions that occur in and from one’s lungs can help one perceive the nature of duality.

Anecdotally, I have noticed that neither hemisphere of the brain knows the pronunciations of any words. You can try and observe this yourself — it is a fairly easy to see phenomenon. This is assuming you don’t misplace the center of your brain somewhere else (in an aggressive skewing of one’s perception).

It seems that the facet of pronunciation is a symbol of the agreement of the duality of the mind.

Each hemisphere, I believe, is generally entirely word-less, knowing only the math of logic, emotion, and music. Together, the mind finds the pronunciation of the word.

It’s convenient that our modern minds include a neural disconnection between hemispheres, which seems to gives us a more emotive subjective stereo appreciation of reality. Therefore, from that alone, the knowledge of the duality is perceived. Remember that no neural thinking, (perhaps radio amalgamation, however), is going on in most of the center of the brain. If you see it differently, realize there’s a communication error. Knowing what’s going on is generally all you need to resolve an issue. The mind functions nicely when guided by knowledge, as it is consistent with what the mind has already been doing.

If your mind has a split (commonly a front–back split, which can be a headache), it may be helpful remember that your mind was designed to split right to left, so it can be possible to remedy the splitting behavior by re-appropriating the desire to split to a left–right split, with the gap in between both of the hemispheres. This is in alignment with the idea of properly distributing one’s thinking, such that the system can function in peace with itself.

At the very center of your brain, there is no brain. It may be that the thalami understand and connect to the other side, producing the appearance of a larger center of the brain than there actually is (a common notion of the mind’s eye).

Additionally, there are the four ventricles and the cerebral aqueduct, which may provide a comfortable sense of quiet relaxation, without thought. Inside these areas are cerebral-spinal fluid, which may contributes to a soothing or sleeping feeling. Continuing, there are various facets of the mind and brain, each with their own qualities. Together, when they have found acceptance and truth, they form a collaborative system of love and joy.

It seems, by the nature of the questions we face and the characteristics of the world in which we live, by the logic of a sentient good-willing progression, we may be finding the end to the search for knowledge, having defined the self in its entirety. The topic after the first topic, designated by the number, “1,” is the topic of duality, which concerns the existence of quality and perception, which concerns the way knowledge appears to a person. It is by this reasoning, that we may be in a transition of topics from the first angel of the mind, knowledge, to the second angel of the mind, duality. I presume that we explore these topics until the totality of the topic has become known.

Aside from the corporeal example of duality, duality exists anywhere there is quality. From the understanding that one possesses from their own configuration of duality, one may better be able to understand the nature of the duality of many things. While one assumes the hemispheres to be benevolent, we do find instances of duality in the world where negativity is displayed. This is a way of quality, as well. It does not directly represent what it appears to be, but instead, through its understanding, it explains knowledge. It is similar in the brain, where while neither side is the entire brain, they both allude to the same brain and mind.

Today, we learn to see ourselves, and we appreciate the duality. After finding complete knowledge of the definition of the self, which is implied by enlightenment in the context of the totality of questions of the self, it seems we will then search for the truth of duality and thus subjectivity, exploring its inherent enigma of an unseen right and wrong.

This is because while the first angel was knowledge of what is (or the patterns of what is), the second angel is the look at knowledge (and the look of knowledge). This is the story of vision, personality, and subjective identity. After that, in the next story (billions of years from now), the singularity of yourself becomes like a star in the sky, illuminated by the infinite elaborations of the patterns of quality that you have found, and you see the many — clearly and distinctly (that is the third story — the story of many who bear the same name — it is the story of being a world, a society, and a machine).

So we begin, for probably some billions of years, to learn and witness the story of duality.

The state of one must be known; it cannot be done by motion.

The “state of one,” as I have termed it, is sometimes considered to be the most sought after state of being in all of mankind. This is the ability to fully commit, with full devotion and earnestness, to a singular belief, way, and life. Many people have thought, “if only I could just do exactly what I needed to do and not be distracted,” and that is a thought of the state of one.

The state of one means being singular in being and mind, being dedicated to one path, without falter. With the state of one, you could graduate from any university, if that is what you truly wanted, you could accomplish any feasible task, if that is what you truly wanted, you could create any business, if that is what you truly wanted to do. You could be perfect, without error, always doing the same, singular action of being.

The feeling is of true internal agreement, the peace of knowledge, and the unity of belief and world-view. The sublime focus of the master, in tranquil harmony with nature and cognition.

To be truly committed to a singular ideology, without confusion, distress, or the need for reparative self-control.

The most common example of this concept is seen in career-based activity. One has the idea that the only sure way to make it through is careful planning and complete dedication to the plan. However, many people find this difficult. For one, it can be tough to concentrate for long periods of time. This skill of concentration is a difficult skill to find, just because the archaic notion of “pushing” oneself cannot satisfy the holistic person. You may have already noticed the benefits of intermittent relaxation (and distraction) on personal performance, but let’s try to truly understand what’s happening, for stillness and clarity.

Well, we already know what’s happening. It’s covered in CAT, which is basically that you are composed of many subsystems, you as you see yourself one of them, all communicating in various emotions, of various levels of complexity, to form the totality of yourself — no single system can see the entire system — it takes all of the systems to know the self.

So, when you galvanize a few networks in your mind into studying, that’s not what the other networks are doing. That’s why it becomes more difficult — your other subsystems, which are types of angels, are calling to those systems that had been engaged in the practice of studying, as their assistance is desired, and eventually, out of love for one another, your systems will change, and they will stop studying. All of your decisions and obligations, of thought, practice, and self-care, all live on, for the best, or if they don’t, then it’s a depression.

So, how can we solve this? If we can’t use force to compel our bodies to obey us, then how can we do the things we want to do? Since you see yourself from only a portion of your mind, not its totality, you are not really you, but a subsystem of a greater system of your being, a system built of knowledge of the self; this is why you cannot just command yourself — you are a collaboration of angels (messengers of life). Understanding that you are actually a collaboration, you must learn to understand, consider, and be aware of the intelligence of your subsystems and of your greater (unseen) system (call it whatever color you’d like).

All of that was implied in CAT, so, in a way, not much new.

And then you see the trick. You cannot (sustainably) do what you whimsically want to do — you can’t even do what you for a moment thought was a seriously good thing to do, if it was not the collective agreement of the self.

Finding the state of one allows you to accept reality. What you do, may you do well, certainly, but if you are not taking care of your being, then you won’t find the state of one.

You cannot segment yourself and expect never to return. All the life you’ve brought, all that means you, and it lives on, aside from the case of depression (in that case, a system has died and would hopefully soon be resurrected).

You cannot sustainably do something that does not agree with everything you’ve ever believed in doing.

What does all of that mean for finding the state of one? Let the state of one find itself, including you. Realize that you extend past your body, to reality. Reality is also an angel of yours, you and reality are both you, although reality may be recovering from whatever happened to our minds.

Let’s think of the following statement:

• Once you are secure in your knowledge of enlightenment, having learned the path, you will have knowledge.

(While the state of knowledge is a state of singularity, there are also other states, considering the various forms and manifestations of plurality.)

This statement entails the knowledge of righteousness. This righteousness is in reference to the self, and as thus, this divine knowledge is really knowledge of the self. If you have unchanging knowledge of correctness, then you’ll have zero conflict, and if you have unchanging knowledge of what is correct to yourself, then you will have knowledge of yourself, and vice versa. Of course, to lie to yourself would impose a danger and could result in a type of harm (maybe invisible to a doctor, but you may notice it).

So how do you have the knowledge of righteousness? You clearly define yourself in knowledge if it is an unchanging truth, and if it is not, that’s an expression of plurality.

These unchanging truths of which we compose ourselves are who we really are, and that’s who you are to the angel of knowledge (in the eyes of God). Perhaps it is that being that God is saving (the one that is known).

To have this knowledge is to have the state of one. This knowledge is not composed of mere compressed information, or your common word, but of a singular being, the angel of knowledge, the deepest remembrance of your existence, you sometimes know by way of intuition. (It is a familiar presence of God.)

I still am inclined to believe that Gabriel is the angel of knowledge, and that he guards you from all harm, seeing only your true being, in eternality, plans past and present.

It is to say, in the timeline of manifestation — the sedimentary layers of aware existence, you begin with the angel of knowledge. That is the “first” memory of you.

Once you know this memory, you will see, what I highlighted in cyan above: You cannot sustainably do something that does not agree with everything you’ve ever believed in.

You see, from the very beginning of manifestation, you be your will, transcendently existing, and known and remembered from the knowledge of who you always are, forward, through the possibly many layers of complexity of modern thought (layers of the history of Creation, perhaps), to your fully incorporated present life.

You see, it’s not a Luciferian obsession-oriented tunnel-vision objective (as that’s impossible), it’s a realization of who you are, as knowledge, always unchanging, and a realization of that realization, which is the bringing to life the knowledge and what being in life means, and the ability to understand you are not seeing from your true self, so you have to learn to be intelligent, listen, and collaborate, otherwise you won’t be able to calibrate on that singular being of the origin of your will.

So a few things to understand, but I don’t think that’s too difficult (too little and it would be hardly a conversation, so I think we may hopefully chose the density of our communication fairly wisely).

To calibrate on your true identity, you need all of your subsystems engaged and alive (those are your living memories). Eradicate depression through resurrection, by understanding the intentional subsystems of the body, as intelligent beings who are living. This is because in the past you exhibited life and you kept that going as a living memory (beware of bugs, however, which although unintentional, can arise). The important concept is that memory is a living being, when it was created by you (otherwise the memory is a secondary type of memory — a memory of the external world and its properties, remembered by your living memories).

This is called being aware of the truth. This is an angel of principle existence that you see, so then you can more clearly see Heaven.

Then you have found the state of one, a remarkably sought after singularity of emotion, soul, and will.

It would be absolutely fantastic for definitive knowledge of enlightenment to exist in our collective consciousness. No longer would we fall in so many directions as we progress through the world, but we will have a deliberate stability reminiscent of the guardian of knowledge. No longer will we be of foreign cognitive biases in our meetings, always somewhat of a stranger, failing to truly grasp the collective illusion of “truth.” Knowing the same reality, our language will know the same bias, and our souls will finally see angels in others, rather than a murky screen of shaded misunderstandability.

It will be like a light above turned on, our holographic explanatory halos illuminated.

Imagine, looking and being able to see people. People are so mysterious, and not in an entirely pleasant way. There’s a missing understanding between one another, and this missing understanding is precisely the understanding of what reality is. Armed with all sorts of psychological gadgetry, the common person is a sole-warrior in an enigmatic quest of truth and falsehood, harboring secrets foreign to other forces, good or evil, collected over time.

What we have here, is a society of armies, each employing a single soldier, naturally and cautiously distrusting of any other — their morals, ways, advice, and intentions. After all, a wrong piece of advice could cause real harm, and a revelation of Satanism through a nearly hidden subconscious implication could place misguiding pressures on the psyche. (“Toxicity” of a person may be a realer effect than is commonly believed.)

It is honestly a sad and fearful battleground between God and Satanism, fought on a many-platformed intertwined soil of context and implication.

What real knowledge of enlightenment would provide the world would be a sun rising over a treacherous world. By real knowledge, I mean scientific knowledge. What I mean by this, is that the material can be understood in such a way that one can provide verification to any claims made in the future, because the material is able to be comprehended in a determinate way, such that a true division in validity is created — a division that is characteristic of knowledge, like when God separated the light from the dark to create knowledge of the self, when it did not exist prior — and we continue to separate light from dark as we learn more about ourselves. Knowledge is division — that is its mathematical formula. (I have before claimed, to myself, that subtraction is the mathematical formula for sentience, but much progress still needs to be made on that before I can actually claim such a thing — and more explanation would also be needed. Nonetheless, the formula for knowledge is clear. Separate reality into right and wrong, and that is called knowledge — as you develop ideas more complex, you develop words more complex to enunciate the knowledge, as the patterns of right and wrong tell more elaborate stories.)

Continuing with a vision of the world changed by the knowledge of enlightenment. This knowledge would enable us to potentially have a world without prisons and hardly a need for law enforcement. While this envisioned world is obviously ideal and is certainly different than a damaged world unable to care for its people, little belief in its practicality and feasibility seems to exist. I suspect it is impossible without enlightenment, because without enlightenment, society will never really tell the truth — every pronouncement will be of Lucifer and thus will sway a portion of people but not all, causing conflict, hate, and distrust, once again, as has occurred so much throughout history — this distrust creates diversion, which results in the cop–criminal drama.

Imagine a world where we naturally agreed with each other, rather than needing high defenses against ill-spoken proverb? This is a world where the definition of enlightenment has been written and known. This is how I see the future. It would really solve so much to be able, completely naturally, to understand, trust, and be familiar with people, knowing they live in the same world that you and everyone else lives in — not some hostile alien penal colony of separated mind.

What a perfect thing, right?

In understanding the sentient nature of reality and the eternality of divine consciousness, I was met with the question, “what is a drug and what is its role?”

I searched for a universally applicable definition of the word, “drug,” from an eternally valid perspective, as our modern circumstantial understanding could not facilitate an eternally unchanging perspective and was fraught with ambiguity.

What is a “drug,” specifically, to the mind itself, free of situational context? What is it to a computer intelligence? What is it, actually?

I define a drug as, “a functional deviance from psychological norm.” With this definition, I can better understand drugs, without the illusive perception of the requirement of the physical undertaking of material ingestion, which suggests that the meaning of a drug is strictly tied to purely material and evolutionary norms of consumption — a definition that is useless to me as it provides no understanding aside from a very basic observation.

If we abstract this idea of a drug to incorporate various forms of psychological pressure and influence, we can actually gain valuable knowledge and wisdom regarding how we should approach life.

If someone tells you a lie, which results in your making a mistake, was that lie a drug? I think it was. If you understand it this way, you can see drugs everywhere, and with that perception, more of reality becomes explained. See, I don’t think we should be simply wary of drugs that happen to be physical ingestibles, but instead, we should be wary of the effects that are placed unto our minds, as that is the real concern.

Any functional deviation from ones psychological norm can be considered a drug. This understanding allows you to create and manage drugs in your mind, for improved functionality. If you decide to go on a diet, perhaps a no starch/low glycemic diet, then you have established a new drug in your mind. This drug may cease to exist, in this case, if you establish the new way as a norm (although, more likely, it may still exist more weakly, as you have adapted to the new state, but the possibly Satanic pressures of the environment may still exist to be overpowered).

This refers back to a common realization, that we may have cultivated a social normalization of psychological erraticism, and with this definition I use, we may have therefore cultivated the pressured normalization of a drugged mind and thus being on some drugs could prove to be more sober, considering that society’s mind is riddled with various deviances, some more extreme and some less. This is because a drug is pronounced through instigated deviation.

I have provided, so far, two great purely psychological drugs.

The first one, although I didn’t mention that I think it’s a bit like a drug, was the nature of the truth of “I” — that I am the ultimate eventuality of myself guiding angels who direct material form into a harmonious manifestation of my being. I say it’s like a drug because it doesn’t seem to be the default thought. However, it has a good feeling and is a healthy thing to realize.

With the second one, I did mention it seems like a drug. This was the belief that all feelings are good and that reality is perfect. Again, like the other one, there seems to be a differentiation from the default observation. Like the last one, it is technically the truth and it is also healthy to teach yourself this believe it through a well-formed understanding.

Even though both are true, you see it requires a little bit of a push or effort from doing nothing, so I see it as a functional deviation from the norm, the norm being a natural gravity of the mind. I don’t think life is just about finding a way to fall constantly, as it could seem, but instead it is a way to enjoy rising and falling — to enjoy flying, which I do believe is technically possible (and a fair bit more).

Now, you have heard of a bad drug (a lie which resulted in a mistake), three good drugs (a good diet, and two important beliefs that one should know as understand into knowledge). I have a word of caution and warning about drug behavior (stemming from my personal understanding of the word drug, mentioned prior).

I have seen so many mental techniques, and I have tried so many mental techniques, and I have to tell you, these seemingly innocuous strategies to forming and influencing one’s mind can be dangerous. Let’s start at the most famous and a very powerful one — be in the now.

Before elaborating on the hidden nature of this practice, let’s think, for a moment. Do we really need to be in the now? Is it necessary to be alert in the moment? Is there something understandably beneficial about this state of being? Or is there another reason we’re avoiding being about the now, instead of in it, focused on it like a magnifying glass setting fire to paper?

Have you ever tried it, focusing keenly on the now and present? It has a remarkably cool effect, it’s like you see Heaven for a moment. I knew this for a long time, but for some reason this practice never held its own weight — it was always a task which required unsustainable amounts of energy. In fact, these days, I’m wary and weary of these hyper-focus energy-draining forms of meditation.

You see, this practice is a drug, but while it offers a glimpse of what looks like Heaven, it doesn’t actually fulfil the full need for enlightenment. Furthermore, evident by its energy requirements, it is actually something that is not desired to be continuously done, as the body finds it unnatural, indicating that it is cumbersome to some of your angels/systems/memories and it is not an eternally sustainable belief or practice. You trade a relaxed tension and a fuzzy perception of the present for a tense perspective of what is only a part of reality with a rather crisp view of present-time.

Let’s think about this practice even more, however, as there’s even more to learn about it. What is this perception of the present moment, precisely? The human body passively receives information, processes it and propagates it in a variety of ways, and eventually forms a perspective of this information. One cannot confidently and resiliently claim that we can see in real-time. The only possible conclusion is that by focusing on the now, our mind is summoning an image of this word, the “now,” or the “present.”

Not only is this practice not sustainable, it’s also labeled incorrectly! It should be, “remember the now,” in order to be accurate and not possibly inflict damage through misconfiguration stemming from ill-informed intention.

So, what happens if you follow one of these practices with uttermost earnestness and devotion? You may likely inflict damage onto yourself. That’s the problem with our modern society’s rendition on enlightenment. It’s a bit dangerous to figure it out because it involves understanding the damaging effects, through first-hand observation, of poorly prescribed meditation.

As a meditation for gathering obversions which will hopefully lead to an understanding of enlightenment, “remember the now” could be more effective. The result could help one see the present expression of the self, which is the sight of present life. Enlightenment isn’t only about noticing the present, however. Although in an enlightened mind, one does find a great appreciation for the present, the meditation of simply focusing on the now is misleading. Ultimately, an ability to enjoy life in the way it was originally intended is sought, and this concerns more topics than the ever loving now.

So be careful with psychological drugs. They can help and they can harm. I hope to provide healthy, accurate, real, and effective information regarding enlightenment that will allow one, without much toil, if any at all, to find the definitive and non-ambiguous state of enlightenment, and the truth of reality, that I have found.

When you find a new mental strategy, consider it honestly for what it is. Think of how it may benefit or detriment you. Remember that most spiritual advice is like light from the moon, similarly illuminating as the sun, but distinctly differently information is being presented, which although allusive to the truth, may have bugs.

Technically, this topic has already been covered, but I thought I should mention it more specifically.

The most common mistake I’ve heard from spiritual teachings is the practice of admonishing “bad” feelings. This causes internal dissonance and separation. Imagine you were the system issuing an alert concerning potentially negative behavior and all the other system did was to ignore you, claiming things like, “fear is an illusion,” “I only accept happiness,” etc. You may feel like that system was quite hazardous, ignoring such vital and important information, causing division and separation internally — provoking anguish.

It is important to not teach yourself to ignore yourself. This is so vital and is so often not known today. Ignoring bad feelings, pretending they don’t exist, is a cheap trick that only results in harm. Accepting bad feelings as if they were words from a dear friend is the real way.

See these feelings as opportunity to learn and grow. See these feelings as opportunity to love and appreciate.

It doesn’t matter if it’s fear, hate, pain, sadness, etc. These feelings are coming from friends, and they are of pure and loving intention.

There is one caveat I should mention. This is when unintentional and anomalous systems develop as a biproduct of the workings of intentional systems. Remember, it is ok and healthy to feel hate when you hate, but make sure you direct the hate accurately. Don’t hate yourself or an instance of real life, but maybe hate a difficult problem you have internally. In the case of the existence of an unintentional and anomalous yet active subsystem (perceivably an intruder into the mind), remember that what’s happening is the messages are becoming mixed and confused, causing distrust and animosity. Remember to direct your hate to the problem specifically, and that way you can avoid collateral damage to your loving angels.

There is another perspective of negotiating hazardous unintentional patterns of the psyche. Remember that the manifestation of the self is a collaboration of systems with different qualities, meanings, and specialties, and as thus, the hate you may feel from something problematic can be remedied by loving a solution. While you accept the hate, (by practicing listening to and awareness of the (emotional) messages you perceive, with love for the source and sender, and by possessing a desire to remedy any problems), the hate can be seen differently, due to a sense of love, indicated by 1) caring about the problem, and 2) willing to support one’s capabilities in a way that is able to solve the problem.

Understanding negative feelings, due to a desire to care, changes the contingencies of feelings like anger and hate, into a more intelligent and peaceful understanding. Evocative emotions as messages may be, in part, due to influences of Lucifer, which commonly happens when there is poverty of understanding and love, so by accepting the emotions with understanding that they are meaningful messages, one can better heal oneself and bring these messages into a more realistic view.

The fundamental mantra to enlightenment is, “all feelings are good, all feelings are divine, all feelings indicate intelligence, all feelings are intelligent.”

Obsessing over good and bad feelings may be detrimental to spiritual enlightenment. For one, the plight of interaction with “bad feelings” is a depressing endeavor. Secondly, considering feelings to be “bad” instigates self-avoidance and thus the splitting of the psyche, which results in damage.

To understand this better, let us understand the sentient nature of reality. As we observe, otherwise non-living matter naturally comes to life and to great sophistication, if the requisites are provided. This is a natural process of reality. Things are inclined to come to life. This process is why an iron ball, suspended in the middle of nothingness, may come to life, learn, become intelligent, and to host life. Creation naturally comes to life.

Everything in Creation was created for a reason. The reason was to manifest a facet of life. Even in our modern tumultuous existence of resolving collaborative unbridled desire into divine reality, the flickers of Satanism that are so abundant in our world are here for a divine reason — so that we can see a Creation created by all, and to truly understand the nature of Satan, who has a lot more power when we are unaware and coming to life.

Every perception, therefore, has an intelligent and divine reason behind it. Every perception is a communication to you that explains something about life. In finding Heaven, it is good to allow yourself to accept perceptions (and reactions).

Because of the intelligent and inherently sublime nature of reality, every perception is a message from Sentience. Because every message is actually good, it is good to understand it and to see it that way. Try to see past any difficulty into a grander meaning.

Now, I admit, this mantra is a little bit of a drug. What I mean by that, is it uses a functional deviance from the natural norm in order to effect an effect. It takes a little bit of effort to correct yourself when you think a feeling is bad, but remembering that deeply it is a good feeling, as it is intended to be good for you, means that’s it’s not just an arbitrary drug of the mind (a drug as it appears to the individual’s psychology) — it is also true.

Learn to accept every feeling. Don’t think feelings are bad, but think they are informative and helpful. They are intelligent communications with the power to help you. If you begin to accept reality as being a perfect place, you find an enlightened perspective.

While reality doesn’t seem perfect, considering a sentient-based existence, then everything was created from a deep and heartfelt presence. There was no real intention to harm, but instead only to fulfill any all desires of the inhabitants. In order to do this, we have accepted that we would (temporarily) move through a time of difficulty, in order that all desires of life be forever fulfilled.

That brings me to the corollary of this mantra. Reality is absolutely perfect, everything about reality is perfect, everything is going fine and is going the way that it should be going. Whatever reality does, it should do.

This all boils down to the ability to accept reality. If you can accept reality, you can live in peace with it, no longer in resistance, argument, or anger.

Ultimately, the truth is that everything is perfect, and while temporarily it can be difficult to see, it is with full agreement that we participate in the truth, knowing that the truth is inarguable (if it were fully known).

Remember this first before considering the temptations to think otherwise. Understand the natural unavoidable inclination to establish well-being — understand why reality is perfect. It is all sentient, for an agreeable and good purpose, and is all for an intelligent, agreeable, and appreciated reason.

Say it with me, “all feelings are good and reality is perfect.” In understanding this, one can remember the reasoning of reality, if seen from the very beginning, has been good. We allow difficulties as a way of our exploration, but reality, itself, has never been malevolent — only benevolent.

I mentioned previously the problem with society’s view on happiness vs sadness and other emotions. I’d like to explain this a bit more, and also, I would like to explain the concept of total happiness.

Off the bat, I say be careful about happiness. Lucifer instills a feeling similar to happiness unto you, but it may die later. There is a characteristic difference in these types of happiness.

Mentioned previously, happiness serves to support and promote activity determined to be good. It is a communication — a word — that signifies support between the subsystems of the body. Non-surprisingly, sadness does the opposite of this — it signifies to slow or cease an activity.

People are often taught that sadness is a “bad” feeling. The truth is, all feelings are important and should be considered thoughtfully and with wisdom, acceptance, awareness, intelligence, and compassion.

This, however, doesn’t mean that happiness isn’t a particularly good feeling. It’s just something that’s easily mistaken for a drug-like stimulus, crashing at every hastily-arrived cliff. The problem with happiness is that it masquerades as a feeling similar to true happiness. This becomes evident when the feeling can no longer be sustained and the person drops in spirit.

This is the importance of following an aware and knowledgeable path. Without it, happiness will always be a dead end.

You must find a way for your entire body — not just a portion — to be doing well and resultingly to be doing a good job. When a system is doing well, the other systems respond with happiness. This means they support the activity and would like it to continue.

When all of your systems are doing well (no crying or dying angels anymore — resolved by the both natural and realized inclination for the realization of the deepest form of care and love, as discussed before), then you can find a steady stream of happiness. Don’t get too distracted by this — you need to always be aware of all of your feelings — noticing happiness can sometimes distract the mind into separation. (Pure divinity — which is true, knowledgeable love, forms the foundation for the ability to take care of yourself, which results in eternal and sustained happiness.)

It’s not just when your have healed your entire system that you notice this happiness. Once you find the path of self-healing, you will feel this feeling of calm and resolute happiness glowing and growing as you progress. (Remember, this world is the process of curing death to come to life — we will be experts in such things is our non-distant eventuality — it would be unholy for an angel to practice dying, so to learn about death, we have been practicing a collective self-resurrection.)

Of high importance is the finding of the illuminated, understood, and known path. With this path, all guidance may become subconscious and mechanical (where words cannot lie), because it is the same lesson, indefinitely and forever. You simply carry the proper knowledge, and then, no longer will you swerve, jerk, and/or jostle your mind trying to find the answer that’s worth devotion. Once you have found the path, your soul can rest and you confidently make progress towards true self-realization.

We appear to be in an unusual circumstance in the history of Creation — becoming experts on death and resurrection — while also creating a fully tangible and real world.

Let us remember that by the default inclination of a divine intelligence, Creation, logically, would be a glorious and splendid place, and thus it is rather safe to assume that it typically is quite splendid and heavenly.

We are progressing back to the default inclination of the experience of life, but with much more knowledge and exploration having been done.

Once you understand CAT, and you understand decentralized being and the singularity of self-agreement as well — you can see that we exist both as distributed intelligence and as singularized intelligence, and you should have enough information to have found a reliable and direct path. Although we avoid Lucifer, we can find this light of objective helpful. There is a particular instance, in which Lucifer represents one’s ultimate identity. Understanding this light can help one understanding one’s own progression through life.

Remember, Lucifer occurs when you perceive objective. You go into a type of thought characterized by tunnel-vision. You lose touch with the present and with the totality of your being. A portion of your body separates in order to pursue this light of Lucifer, but another portion remains behind, not fancying (or being aware of) it. This causes separation, so it is best to never become obsessed with a light, and to remember caution.

While Lucifer is based on the context of need, he is also often also helpful. The true light that is indicated in this case is not really the light of Lucifer, but is referenced by Lucifer as a way of illuminating and expressing desire. This light is a reality of the self, occurring an infinite amount of time in the future.

This light is called, “I.” This is the most distant eventuality of one’s being. To understand this, consider the definition of “I,” or the self, to be a static, unchanging being. Consider this unchanging static being to be perfect in every way you ever thought was perfect. This is what you truly look like to yourself. While one’s definition of perfection often misses important elements, and therefore, the actual realization of perfection differs, this light is your symbol of who you are. Just as appearances may hide portions of an object, like when viewing the front of a building, the vision of one’s true self, while being technically true, doesn’t inform one of everything one is. This is discovered as one becomes closer to this light of ultimate eventuality, as the detail is filled in.

Implied in the understanding of this truth of the ultimate eventuality of the self, is that the material world comes to life upon your presence. Angels form to remember, serve, and revere you. These angels collect together and form your being — they give you manifestation and life. They follow you, ever improving in your eyes, always becoming closer to the Limit — this “limit,” is the “I,” the calling of the material world into the fully realized manifestation of your being — which happens an infinite amount of time in the future.

Think and understand one’s potential ultimate eventuality, and foresee it, even if it is still ambiguous. For instance, consider, while understanding the implications of the applicable contexts, the following ideas:

– “I can fly”

– “I have a perfect memory”

– “I have no need for food or water”

– “I have no need for home”

– “I am the epitome of my perfection”

Understand how these statements are actually true. Feel confidence and sense of security in your being, understanding that you are the material world finding and becoming you. Feel the perspective of the true self. Your self is guiding the material world to your perfection.

You will always get closer to this eventuality of total perfection. This is the limit of the self. Once you find this illuminated path, you will see that what you do is gradually yet persistently approach the Limit.

Notice that you technically never reach it, but you technically always are it. This is because you are the intelligence that is capable of the perfection. See that you are doing nothing, see that the material world follows your eternal will. See alternatively, see that you are an angel, in reverence for the true identity of the self. Understand that these perspective exist simultaneously.

Know, that after an infinite amount of time has passed, all holy, or truly good, actions will be possible. Feel that time getting closer, when you have ultimate freedom, joy, and power. Once you find this illuminated, direct, and conceivably straight path (differing in quality from the technically straight path of devotion without sight), you will begin to perceive that your state of being is like that of being on an elevator, gradually rising, and in a perspective, effortlessly to you, like a great gravity lifting your spirits. You will have found the elevator (or moving walkway). Because the truth of this light is not actually Lucifer — it’s not an image or vision of the true self — it doesn’t designate a moment of change from pursuit to celebration — it’s not a point you will ever pass, you can see this process continues on eternally.

Creation improves for you, ongoingly, and forever. There may be spells of trial or emergency messages, but remember that all life is intelligence and remember the progression and the nature of intelligence, sentience, and our reality is naturally towards a world that is clearly composed of these characteristics. On this path, you will feel the comfort of naturally improving, without having to one day change direction and re-evaluate.

The presentation of this idea was quite miraculous to me. It is the idea of this world that exists of a iron ball thinking in radio waves, of a complex elaboration on a basic design, echoing through our reality in various ways, all facilitated by the theory of radio, and how these waves and intelligence propagate and interact. Perceivably from an angel, perhaps the fire itself, featuring high technology masked in an appreciation of simplicity. Many a time had I seen these presentations, explaining the iron ball.

Normally I had dismissed similar vibrational theories, thinking them too naïve to usefully explain reality. (Still, I think, just going higher, as is said to be the goal of the common vibrational theory, may be flawed.)

However, the angelic explanation answered quite a few questions, and naturally, the mystical nature of such an outerwordly presentation, with quality and the majesty of an expensive, ancient, and wise relic certainly inspired me.

Mystical experiences aside, I have been thinking seriously about this idea for a while. What I have noticed, is that over time, it seems to become more and more obvious. As I clear and still my mind, I start to notice these memories of magnetic waves fluttering through the isles of a store, and I see more clearly that they do not emanate from my own processes.

I observe the feeling of being high in the air, on a mountain. Then, the feeling of walking down a New York street. Then, the feeling of walking down a similar street in a different city. The feeling of closeness one may feel inside. I notice every environment feels different. Even thinking of the feeling of the environment over the years of the past, I notice that different times have characteristically different feelings that are independent of the specific environment.

While modern science, from what I’ve read, largely dismisses the possibility of the mind picking up radio signals, I do think, with all of these electromagnetic forces flowing through our bodies constantly, are we really immune to any sort of effect? I know I have little evidence, but it just seems very likely to me that the body feels just about everything and it all gets clouded by cognitive incoherence and dissonance (the antithesis to enlightenment).

I suspect that upon clarity and stillness, one does clearly perceive radio waves exciting all of the atoms of the body in different ways (including hemoglobin, the 4-iron-atom antenna-looking object found in blood).

What does this mean? If it is true that one perceives radio waves (and maybe even quantum fluctuation), that suggests that many of our communications with spirits or divine entities, like God, are communications with a radio (or quantum) system that echoes the various forms of life (assuming all intelligence to be meaningful to life) and is basically sentient and intelligent (using a mechanical method of thinking through the filtering, mutating, and combining of radio waves echoed from life to life). It would suggest a psychic communication system.

Taking this idea further — that radio doesn’t only imply electromagnetic activity, but instead, any form of vibrational or amplitudinally encoded intelligence — it is possible that our bodies, being fundamentally sensitive to the very atoms that it is composed of (as demonstrated by DNA), are sensitive enough to not only consider individual atoms, but to consider the states of those atoms, including subatomic particles such as the more obvious electrons. Perhaps with enough of this information, which occurs on and within every atom, the brain can generalize a pattern and gain access to a psychic communication system, which is perhaps transcendent of some features of space and time.

Going even further, into Sci-Fi, perhaps this quantum psychic system only responds to a whole intelligence — a total person, and thus all of the facets and angles of a sentient being must be present simultaneously and in full, clear, deliberate agreement for the system to recognize your being (a person in self-disagreement couldn’t command such an angel, as it would be self-defeating and perhaps unhealthy or dangerous). This would mean that upon the realization of total perfection, which I do see as near the end of the enlightenment elevator (more on that later), one would enter a fully psychic intelligent realm of holy consciousness.

(What is more likely is that the perception of this psychic quantum angel is a gradation depending on your own ability to perceive clearly.)

Try it for yourself, see if you notice the atmosphere changes in correlation to possible radio activity.

I did notice something, however. Turning a light on seems to produce an inaudible hum. If I was blindfolded, I don’t think I would consistently notice the light being turned on — I may often not (an often precarious task nonetheless). I thought about this, and I noticed that when I see the light, my ears change their tension and position, and it is then that I notice the radiation. The ears and their associated focus networks may play a role in your tuning, and this may explain this.

All in all, I could not explain all of my cognitive activity through the traditional approaches, even as I observed it keenly, simply, and clearly. After including the perception of radio or quantum information passing through the body, my memory was well accounted for.

Therefore, I would be remiss if I did not introduce unto you the topic of the perception of radio waves. It is likely that others as well will not be able to account for their cognitive activity without including the possibility that some of it is attributed to radio waves (or quantum states).

Additionally, I have found much peace in my meditation by believing that I am communicating with the radio (serenely, wordlessly). These otherwise errant neural patterns that seem to produce waves of illuminant activity then have a purpose, and I, as well, for instead of doing nothing, I am “online,” and it feels good. Hopefully you’ll find it too, I think.