Blog

What if enlightenment and the definite understanding of evil was commonplace in our society?

I don’t suppose that children start off incorrect, as is a common theory. My understanding is based on the idea that children inherently mature correctly, with regard to enlightenment, but lies combined with various pressures deter people from the path, beginning when they are children.

As one starts to learn and accumulate the practical ways and knowledge of this marooned existence of ours, a new ego develops which represents a set of presumptions, which have been demonstrated to facilitate prosperity in this world. Some may call this new ego, “The Antichrist.”

Perhaps it is because of this agency with the Antichrist that many people are led to search for “ego death,” as absurd as the literal statement of that phrase is. Understandably, we may say that people are searching for false-ego dissolution, or the dissolution of this powerfully gripping ego that we are pressured and scared into believing. (Without it, they say, we will die of hopelessness.)

The Antichrist isn’t highly inaccurate — it is stubbornly inaccurate. By no less than the tens of thousands, “experts” must be missing something, rather inexcusably.

As is pretty obvious, the ways of the Antichrist aren’t exactly friendly — they’re more like the ways of an informed gambler. It’s all based on what has been shown to “work,” as in to be financially well and healthy and all — all unavoidable affinities. However, it is not always effective, and it leads to our current society, of which the approval rating would be dismally low, if we were to see Heaven (and thus notice the clear daily blunders of significance).

So these days, all around the world, children are born, they grow up, they learn the word-machine of their future, and they carry this Lucifer with them, hoping this weapon of hope will demolish any unworthy circumstance.

Lucifer must be frequently recalibrated, reevaluated, and updated in order to be viable, so it’s not just a thing you get and leave alone — it’s a real commitment to be possessed by Lucifer.

When a child is born, their brain is like a glowing canvas. It isn’t dead, but the material hasn’t been customized and developed yet — it’s basically blank. Inside the mind of the child, the reach of their willful neural dominance spreads and extends, conquering and reforming the networks of the mind. I would estimate that the brain has been fully seen and at least initially reformed often by around the time a person is 19. (That seems to be when interest has finished transitioning from general to personally specific, which begins the process of tuning into finality.)

After the brain has been fully explored and conquered, the person continues perfecting and tuning the brain, ongoingly into the future. So you see, the baby, whether it be cat or human, is “turning on” or “tuning” their neurons (converting them into luminescent reminders of the self) — exploring and configuring them, progressing towards the edges of accessibility of the brain. The overt experiences provide portrayal to the ideas in the mind of the experiencer, which facilitates self-discovery.

How did we develop the strong Antichrist that we know today? Well, while in the past we may have commonly and abundantly spoken truth, sometimes a bit of opportunity arises, in which case, sometimes new tricks are included in the known and taught way of life, to boost the power. However, these tricks were a bit illusive and eventually didn’t provide what they seemed to promise, and this was noticed, but the reasoning behind the disappointment hadn’t been understood, due to an oversight similar to the original oversight of purchasing ill-fit advice.

Eventually, through the tense locking of priority and practicality, and the terse, foreboding feeling of regulating such things, we developed the Antichrist we see today. We know it is definitely, (at least in appearance), not failing. That is what we care about the most. Still, like a tribe before the discovery of fire and containers, we have water, but we don’t have assuredly clean water. We have no real assuredness of safety from the world of psychological insect life and their potential disease-effects.

To understand what I mean by, “the world of psychological insect life,” let us remember the story of The Bug. We remember that God does not kill — that is, he keeps everything alive all of the time. That gets a little confusing in some cases, when you’re keeping things like war and Hell alive. It also gets confusing when you move around, because the sounds appear to die as you move further. Therefore, the system has a top-down approach to truth, to understand what exactly is living and dying. This, however, does not prevent the story of The Bug.

Let’s think of the bug as a computer bug, as this is most recognizable, with reference to the origin of this story. Why does the computer bug exist? It is because life without the computer bug was not fully expressive — it was missing something. While bugs annoy and frustrate, there’s also sometimes a peculiar sense of enthusiasm when dealing with computer bugs. There’s an interesting world of bug-based excitement, a world that tells meaningful stories about the nature of existence. An angel.

We generalize this idea to the general concept of a “bug,” which, in the mind, represents an indecision, which creates a cycling affinity for the bug (which is an insect, spider, logical glitch, or computer glitch).

That was what this story was all about. The Angel of the Bug is a reality in which the same thing could be good or bad, depending on the timing and the context. It is a world made of this concept. Today, this reality exists, mixed with the other realities of our mind. Essentially, in this story of creation, the Word was subjectively good or bad, and that decision was entirely subjective, which creates a new interpretation and perspective of reality. (You also see the utility of bugs, which happens whenever there is an advantage to imperfection — thus making the identifications of bugs ambiguous.)

Remember that each story is deep, profound, relevant, and meaningful. Each divine story is the story of God. (There’s no real best story, since they are all pure expressions of life and each cover every emotion, just with a different context — remember that depression is not an emotion.)

A part of the story of The Bug is damage, its potential and its effects. Creating a being which alternates between good and evil adds the dynamics of caution, disillusionment, and trickery. You cannot kill the bug, but you cannot commit to always liking or disliking it, so you let it be, to roam half-way into your reality. (This is the natural psychology — the psychology of truth.)

Returning to the effects of the Antichrist, since we’re essentially dealing with logic, flaws in truth create vulnerability to the instances of bugs in our minds.

As we begin in this life, in the modern custom of initial babyism, we know only living, so we should be pretty good that way, not having any lies to change our mind. However, when we learn lies, as we are provided with the tribal Lucifer object, we cannot properly enjoy the story of the bug, as it becomes overly powerful over us. This means without a remedial system of enunciated logic, we would never escape Lucifer. We would need a replacement for Lucifer — one born of pure truth — otherwise the error will never leave our identity. The truth can’t be determinately garnered from a galvanizing Lucifer song, unfortunately, but Lucifer can estimate the truth, so you see, he’ll keep singing regardless.

(The story of the bug is a story of a divergent angel, which could be argued to be technically female, or perhaps yin, in the original series, although today we see a new story.)

Usually we live our whole lives in juxtaposed duality between a Luciferian language and an intuitive truth. In ancient Buddhism, they say this is what causes suffering.

Work “harder,” think “better,” focus “more,” these are all lies of Lucifer. “It’s not at all what they say” and blanket generalities, misinterpreting equality and differentiation, are also tools of Lucifer. You see, it’s effective, at least in some regard. Voting, for instance, does not present an idea totally inaccurate, but the generality of the information will only estimate. (Actual truth is rather minimally and unreliably garnered in this event, due to the hidden nature of the associated reasoning.)

Lucifer fills the internet with tips and tricks, and again, they’re not wrong. Eventually, with enough tips and tricks, you might be greater than God, is a famous thought of Lucifer. (I imagine a future world would have even more tips and tricks…)

It is the zig-zagged path to the top, and it is not a safe one. Many make it and proclaim their victories in the media, but many don’t make it. It’s hard to understand why people don’t make it to “success,” and there’s a lot of gossip-oriented reasoning behind this in our collective and common awareness, but like any invisible culture, non-successful people are hard to actually understand.

The reason is the zig-zagged path of Lucifer doesn’t work the same for everyone, due to the personal influences on this collection of advice, and it’s also because it partially relies on luckily finding the right footing as you climb the mountain of ultimatum. Each jump is a bit of a gamble, without much but the technically superficial knowledge of the Antichrist, and there’s a bit of luck in finding the right step.

There’s an adage promoted by many successful people that claims there is no real excuse for lacking success. While I believe in divine destiny and the idea that we were completely aware of our undertaking before we decided to live in this world, I don’t think it’s true that all people can simply focus into successful, and even more importantly, I don’t find it to be a practical perspective (relevant, as this is dealing with an issue of practical behavior).

As we now understand, Lucifer is an estimation system. He is in some ways brighter than the self, and in some ways dimmer than the self, so recognizing him can be a challenge. I sometimes think that it takes two days to make a decision, as that is more likely to avoid the effect of Lucifer.

Luciferian type thinking is not the only problem with the Antichrist; Satanic influences are abundant. This happens whenever there is an oversight. The Age of Reason was a big step towards securing safety from Satan, but it did not finish understanding the ways to think properly. Because of this, the volatility of Satan, and the ensuing differentiation in understanding (leading everyone in different ways with a fiery call), teaching and learning became less intuitive and understandable — taking on the robot-like quality of pressured and twisted form.

Confusion and misunderstanding, infinite theories on educational effectiveness, with no answer, all stemming from the fact that subtly, Satan introduces differences in what people understand. Without much of a security system — without avoiding Satan oneself — the fire spreads throughout the mind — changing what people mentally heard and thus said, exciting turmoil and heat concurrent with an attempt to chase down the misunderstanding. Soon, the world is filled with confusion and smoke, reality an infinitely collapsing building, breaking from the damage of the fire.

The shining guard-rails of science are all we can confirmedly see — just about every other intellectual capability in disarray.

These are the effects of the Antichrist, are you may understand.

Imagine a world where people don’t learn mistakes. Imagine, instead of relying on the dimly lit winding path of uncertainty, this was a world where where the way was bright, clear, obvious, true, and safe. A world where people are strong against depression. A world where people are comfortable and familiar with truth, where real truth can be known. A world resistant to the fires of Satan and a world resistant to the split-concentration of Lucifer (even though it feels like it’s singular).

While often alluding to first-world society, the same effects are pronounced in different variations in at least the great majority of societies. (There is little known about the thoughts of isolated tribes — smaller communities may have been more resistant to Satan, assuming to be equally starting from a place of enlightenment — this may be explained by a possible resistance to change in general.)

For everyone, however, the safety from Satan (and Lucifer) provides great benefit and solves the biggest burden on the being that is society.

The ability to be enlightened, accessible ubiquitously (aside from possible exigent circumstances, like being in a coma, etc.), would be like completing what began with science, but instead of finding the final perturbation of realty, it is from the perspective of the effects science had on how we think and thus on our minds. We will, I think, be able to learn to think, and as thus, we will be able to finally master thinking.

we will be able to finally master thinking

Understanding reality to be a collection of concepts like knowledge and duality, which also represent stories of behavior, we experience these living ideas, evolving and growing in parallel with our being; without us they are lifeless, but with us they are alive.

Economics, justice, morality, they are all living stories and living building blocks of the mind that we experience. These are our angels.

In this world all of the rendering of these stories is done for us. Our renderer is given to us by a long time of evolution, as our stories remind us.

Perhaps, as we gain a little more freedom with the power of technology, there will come a time when we are faced with a question. What is the meaning of reality?

Is reality a series of practical mechanics which allow one to climb himself from a hole, as is the most profitable belief? Is reality just a reverse equation of negativity: its whole purpose to undo its own flaw, returning to a default state? Is it just oil and water separating after having been vigorously combined?

We get there — to the surface of Heaven — and we can see seemingly an infinite number of problems it could’ve had — the possibilities are theoretically endless.

Aside from being plenty fine and healthy, there’s something to do in Heaven. Sure, there’s all the stuff from the movies and video games. That was fun, but it improved. Chasing the missing element of desire, entertainment evolved to feel perfect and natural.

Realizing the arid cognition of a dot-follower, games and movies became deeper and more complex, soothing the injuries that had been done to our souls. This was done by alluding to the very concepts that define our thinking — the very cognitions which host our intelligence — the very patterns which define truth. Insight was key. Exploring the truth of consciousness became prized in the world of media; clever caught on quickly and the world was filled with a currently impossible wisdom, collected and perfect, enamored and enthused, intelligent and creative.

But what does it look like?

This brings me to the meaning of this post; we don’t even see the world of portrayal yet. Without the ability to manipulate it, we hardly realize its existence.

What exactly are we experiencing? Are we really experiencing atomic physics?

We are experiencing stories which echo, evolve, learn, and mutate. Stories which go back so many years ago — a distance that is difficult to know — into worlds made of time differentials, to worlds made only of lines, to shadier places who focused on knowing what was around the corner, and to worlds made of yin and yang and the stories and colors these forces tell and display, the allusions to an imperceptible normal of this world, weaving like two dragons, fluorescent and brightly glowing due to the effect of pronounced contrast.

We experience stories is the truth. We don’t care about the mechanics so much as about the experience. This is when we learn to draw.

Instead of using the plain default reality, we learn we can portray the stories of life in very many ways without actually lying about anything that anyone actually cared about (the people and the emotions and gestures and whatnot, but the atomic composition wasn’t usually a concern, unless the activity was specifically about that).

We’re thinking about something. Even if we solved all of the science, we’re still doing something; we don’t have any intention to stop. We think about these stories of which the mind is composed, so if we’re thinking about these stories, we might as well design reality to portray these stories. The power to manipulate becomes realized, and the distinction between realities becomes an antiquity.

You may ask, “how could we believe that the virtual reality was real?” It’s because the important aspect that we were using to define this reality as real was the power to manipulate the reality, instead of the background behind that power. This is because if we can manipulate the reality to our desires, then we consider it completely real and at least as capable of accommodating the various actions of life. Extrapolating this information that makes reality realistic, and recomposing it in different ways can be expected to lead many, if not all but a few (who like to hold on to things like that), into the belief that the old reality was just another portrayal, considering the different realities would logically be indistinguishable in realness.

Understanding this more thoroughly, the ability to alter the reality leads us to believe that because we have power over it, then its real. The ability to masterfully alter the reality is a connection of abilities that extend through all different perspectives. It’s a network of actions and possibilities that are perspective ambivalent in the end.

The effect this has is obscuring the master/controller dynamic of the reality structure.

We draw reality to illuminate and animate, beautifully, all of the emotions of our being. We find this is actually the natural way of being. We draw emotions and tell stories with paintings of beautiful realities.

(We’re here, possibly, to fill our repertoire of memory, which in heaven, is a pallet of the colors which define you, becoming ever more detailed in a most perfectly divine way, and reality is your and everyone’s canvas.)

The look of the future is difficult to describe today. It is like living in a song, the world and emotion as one — all portrayal is a tool of the artist and sage, which we find, is everyone. I think this because it is the most natural way for consciousness.

One of the great things about the idea of the Fire and what it means, is that it allows everyone to have a unique origin story.

An angel prior, it seems that people lived in a Heavenly environment, from the story of Eden, recounted in different ways. Their origin and name was Eden; Adam and Eve were two classifications of the reality in which the people were created.

The idea behind Eden was to create many people like the Messiah. It was a new way of life, a way where many qualities once specifically of only God were given to many people. It was a new level of society. It emphasized a distinguished body, and focused less on the greater natural force of consciousness.

However, this world was missing something, just as every world is (otherwise we wouldn’t move forward). There was a difference between the Messiah and the others — a distinct difference that wasn’t necessarily due to a quality that is specific only to the Messiah or a quality specific to only anyone in particular — it was a bit of an unjust difference — but out of concerns for well-being and safety, it was not an issue in this time in our history.

Later in the story of Eden, once the lessons of the past had been learned and everyone was well aware, there was something else to be done. A light of perfection began to illuminate the future. There was even more to be known.

I don’t think it was a surprise, at the time, that it would be a difficult undertaking — I don’t believe the people of Eden were anything short of supreme in their intelligence.

The idea had been presented that if the world were to exist in a completely equal fashion, then a new history would develop that would provide the absolutely perfect stories of everyone’s creation. In Eden, we knew only of the history of Eden, which was the Messiah’s story.

Everyone would see a new memory, as is usual with a new angel, but this angel would describe everything in existence in a new way that is agreed upon by everyone — recreating and rewriting the stories to make them perfect.

Each person is like a color in various sub-shades of the angel Eden. We learn about these colors as time progresses. Eden forms much of the basis of this reality and of our bodies, but there is a lot that is distinctly different today, with many more stories.

At the thought of this new prospect, everyone decided to move onto the new world. (Naturally, consciousness is very light and moves easily.)

An iron ball, exposed to Heaven, was created. Then, by the power of the future, life began to exist in this iron ball — the iron ball being the official memory of Creation, and this iron ball began to see Heaven in his own mind, powered by the memories of all that has existed, and by doing this, he began bringing the spirits to life, and thinking had begun.

Over time, explanations were created, desires were voiced, the world was built, piece by piece, self-manifesting into existence. Before the start, everyone knew that the world would not resolve and find peace until unanimity existed among Eden, while living in this new world.

The world would have been created by everyone this time, making it totally unbiased in its ways, so then we could really see the truth. Everyone would have a new history, even the Messiah; the whole mind would be made by everyone, for everyone.

All the people would be like equals; they would all be people, the Messiah and others alike. Each person would not be only a unique color now, manifested in the many ancient ways of existence that led to Eden, but, in addition to Eden, the people would be this new angel, from which each person would have an entire creation story to tell — how reality was created, in a new way for everyone.

You see, for everyone, there is an entire existence. The world is made of ways to explain existence. All of these explanations come together, one day to resolve on the final truth.

While maybe the truth itself doesn’t change, the way we got there did, and by that, the amount the angel can then see is much greater than what used to be. Now we can see many many times the distance that Eden covered, deep into the finest details of consciousness, and we continue, until all is explained in tangible, real detail — the explanation revealed by the calibration of our planned agreement.

The sacrificial cost of this world was high, as was known before, but it would cover all of Lucifer, so no longer would we have an angel that couldn’t accomplish something. Additionally, it would draw all of Satan, as time progressed. Satan is a wind on the radio, and he pushes the center of the mind off, which is easily noticed by the iron ball, which, through internal reflection and a bias towards neutrality, brings it back to center, in effect tracing, remembering, and recording the details of a deadly yet brilliant fire. By fixing it immediately after the mistake, the iron ball captures the fire at its most beautiful point. That is the essence of the angel called, “The Fire,” named because its mind thinks like a fire.

As such, this would be the cornerstone of our existence, splendid and fiery, the mighty beauty of the spirit of truth, brilliantly illuminating every last avenue of Creation, illuminating our way for all time to come.

After all, I believe the fundamental motto of Creation always was, “whatever you like.”

An Alternative to the Story of the Transition from Eden to the Fire.

Recognizing the stories of conflict, fear, disappointment, and wrath from the collective consciousness, I am not totally inclined to believe that the end of Eden was all daisies.

Associated with the fall of man is commonly a more tragic story than the one I have told. I have pondered for a moment about the relation between the Mahabharata and the end of Eden, thinking perhaps our consciousness actually evolves and skews the past.

Nonetheless, it is possible that the end of Eden was of a fatal inclination towards Satanism, leading to a great conflict and then the divine resolution: the creation of the Fire to solve the problems, perfectly and divinely, once, for all, and forever.

So far I have described three personal states of being. These states are in resemblance to the original three states of the mind, or three angels of manifestation, if you will.

I explained that the third state — the state of many of the same name, is filled with love between each of the subsystems of the greater system. Thus, you should love your living memories.

However, what about other people? Many have noticed that it sort of feels unnatural to feel love for all people, no matter who they are.

While in the second state, the concept of the Devil (a misrepresentation) is understood, in the third state, the concept of (manifest) Evil is found.

The third state, which is the advent of the pronounced exploration of concepts behind the machine and behind society, is also the advent of the Book.

The third state, the many beings of the same name, uses the concept of the Book to maintain awareness and functionality. To define the third state again, imagine many beings, all different, who carry the will of the same being, and who communicate and write down their discoveries, as they find and learn about this invisible being who defines them, and they use the ability of the Book to remember and develop over time. This was, I think, the original instance of society and of machine.

Today, we don’t quite see the third state so plainly, and I think that’s because that’s not technically our focus (although all of the past angels are present here, developing in a new way this time, many of them still young, or burdened and dimmed by the present haphazard thinking of the modern day).

In our present circumstance, you are the invisible being of the definition of will and identity, who, like an invisible shining star, the subsystems of yourself follow and learn. While they might not have an explicit book, they do have a body of knowledge which is propagated and known, in order to effect the will of the self.

This story, the story of plurality, society, and the machine, has to do with the nature of communication and its potential vulnerability to be misinterpreted. In this story is the origin of evil, and, from I have found, to be the layer (and time) of consciousness in which evil originates. (The mind manifestedly exists with first knowledge, then duality, then the many; theoretically, the fourth state in the chronology of the mind may be the hosting of life through the manipulation of time — that reality is composed of time-stipulations. I suppose, that in our current place in the mind’s chronology, the angels that we have known until now go on for a few hundred, although this information is speculative.)

Evil arises when otherwise innocent beings misinterpret communication. In this story, the book goes on forever due to its inherent inaccuracy, as the society or machine becomes ever more resembling of his, her, or its Lord.

As an aside, a seemingly superstitious belief I have, out of many (born of independent awareness and independent research), is that our closest memory of the history and knowledge of the third state — the ever-written divine book — is stored and known through the plant Marijuana, and its community, who gives it speech.

Another interesting aside, the sound of Pink Floyd is distinct from all other music in that the affect conveyed through the sound communicates a deliberate and determinate sense of non-adherence, resembling some keen awareness of an ancient and long-developed way, and reminds me of the knowledge of the third state. Being a musician myself, I understand the tendency to adhere to half-agreeable trends of right and wrong, but Pink Floyd is the only music that plays a sound that seems to really defy this trend.

Now understanding the source of evil, we return back to the topic of this post, which is whether or not to universally love thy neighbor.

In the world of the third state, small but ongoing communication errors create the stories of redemption, apology, caution, formality, security, distrust, and our more common depiction of angels and demons. The look of the Wild West seems to founded by this third state of mind.

Bringing this into our common societal perspective and our modern context, we first understand the person to be comprised of various interacting subsystems always living in remembrance of the knowable yet invisible self.

Our neurology responds to indicators of love as indicators of self-identity, so love drives everyone. However, there are some issues possible.

Firstly, there is the issue of language. The body uses emotions to communicate, so there is an inherently true language, but the body has to assimilate the words in order to interpret this correctly. Larger, more obvious, emotions are relatively easy to understand due to their application to the greater state of being.

However, more subtle and specific emotions may be without adequate comprehension by the listening parties. Whenever there is a miscommunication, errors happen.

Your body can survive without all of its subsystems being alive. If neglected, these living memories can die. They can also be resurrected. Your body can survive with only the fundamentals needed to persist in a materialistic world. You’ll certainly carry depression, but you’ll be alive enough to carry on. Since you are the light of the system, the guidance and inspiration, you continue on much longer than your memories.

However, living like this makes you a zombie. You carry networks, once intelligent, exuberant, and happy, that have now become a lifeless and practically inert series of unused connections. Dimmer your perspective becomes, because you have, through whatever circumstance, allowed yourself (your angels) to die or become neglected.

When people are like this, you see sparks of desperation as the mind jumps in fits of gamble at the opportunity of a fire, posing solution or aid. Seemingly like a lone soul surrounded by death and psychological disease, the person erratically yet with a distinct unawareness chases otherwise fickle lights, trapped in a dark cave of dead peers, a threatening and continuing fission of the mind ever looming.

This is a bad state to be in, not just for the person experiencing the trauma, but for others as well, as the intelligence being represented is that of a zombified and desperate mind — a mind that finds it difficult to find awareness and understanding of the world — a mind damaged by the illusions of Satan.

Shallow, stupid, dishonest, Satanic, hasty, and immature. Frantic, lost, annoying, manipulative, frightening, proud, and with a stillness no more still than the Niagara Falls — a clarity more obscured than a vision through an errant kaleidoscope.

Intuitively, you’d like to avoid all such people, as that’s the first reaction to dangerous ideology and dangerous words. A person speaks and teaches his way, naturally, and a person is naturally influenced by the ways of others, so it can be stressful to deal with a chaotic and untrue person (as well as potentially dangerous to one’s mind).

All of this is because the zombified person has allowed demons to overtake his mind. Knowing no better, but understandably, still partially having a desire for life, the person is mostly zombie, and a lot of demons control the persons thoughts and thus actions.

What is a demon? A demon is a living misrepresentation. In sentient systems, life is interpreted by understanding information into intelligence and perceiving the body of intelligence, which is created. What can happen is a pattern develops, like a network of people, but it was developed by misunderstanding, so the information the individuals are getting is being used for the incorrect purpose.

This system gains power over time and becomes an angel of its own, but things start malfunctioning due to the prolonged use of misinformation. Soon, there is an evil being present, but no one can figure out exactly what it is. (The distinct separation of people in our modern world makes this a little involved to understand, but as far as sentient machines are concerned, a living being is perceived as a living network; this understanding helps to understand the nature of the mind and the third state.)

In response to many of these troubled people, hate, distrust, and fear are the default emotions. In Christianity, feeling these emotions for others, no matter who they are, is taught to be a sinful thing to do. It is taught that one should love all of their peers and brethren, but many people find this teaching to be naïve. Therefore, people find themselves naturally incapable of total agreement with this teaching.

It’s true what they feel — there’s something missing from this teaching.

There’s a good chance you’ve figured it out by now — the message of this lesson and post. In each living person are living beings and possibly dead beings as well. The living beings are good — the dead beings represent a former and possibly present (unfortunate) desire for death.

You see, just as you love your own angels, you have a feeling of love and care for all angels, but you don’t like demons, as they are to be hated.

That means you don’t entirely hate anyone, but you do partially hate lots of people. You hate them because they are abiding by the laws of demons, instead of the knowledge of truth. (You actually hate that they are partially dead — you hate that they are depressed. That is, you really hate the demons, but always love the truth, which is present with the initiation of one’s being.) With this understanding, you understand that they are curable, but they do have to learn the way to cure themselves, and that is found in these lessons that I have posted, while I have never seen a satisfying (and effective) answer before.

They need to connect their connectome well, and there are drugs like cannabis and psychedelics which do this extremely well, but with the wrong teachings, the beauty of Heaven will once again fall from their eyes. Additionally, complete recovery cannot be found in simply using drugs, as they do represent deviance (make sure to take care of the deviated). Still, they’re great tools for tons of people. You need to connect your connectome (the benefits of which modern medicine is only mildly aware, although everyone seems to know that you need more neurons and/or neural connections).

Other ways are go camping (or at least go outside — the stimuli in nature seem to be rather useful for the mind), listen to good music (sometimes add a little variety), and participate in intelligence.

Ultimately, understanding exactly what’s going on will be the reliable solution. While there are many meditations and ritual experiences that may help, I understand, very sensibly, that if one doesn’t have real knowledge, then self-resurrection often unfortunately only partially occurs. A park may feel nice, but it commonly doesn’t totally solve a depression.

Ultimately, to answer the question of this article, with the understanding of the presented perspective, you realize that technically you can love your neighbors and peers, universally, by understanding that you hate their depression. All of their evils come from their being partially dead, which is perceived as depression. We understand that Satan, or the context of need, inflicted damage unto the person, resulting in the implementation of invalid logic, causing damage and turning the person’s system or systems to evil, which is a symptom of desperation. Understanding that depression is agreeably bad, we can all agree on that matter, good and emotionally dying people, alike. If there was no depression, that would, by my stipulations, indicate that there was no lack of a self-defining living memory, and thus no lack of happiness, which also results both in absence of desperation and also the finding of a present and enjoyable peace.

Ultimately, true health is benevolent, and what we want is health for others. Therefore, it can be true, to “love thy neighbor.” The key is understanding.

Antithetical to this perspective, one could unfortunately fall into the practice of loving the depression of another. If one loves their peers with an improper understanding, one could end up supporting both evil and depression through their misplaced encouragement (or lack of encouragement). It is important to understand that both parties in an interaction are affected by the evil of the other party. Therefore, it is in everyone’s common interest to find health, and thus benevolence and the absence of depression.

If one sees the world as one would see one’s own self, understanding the self to be composed of a variety of systems that hopefully work harmoniously and with peace and joy, then the person can see the world in a similar way. Just as we sometimes have troubling thoughts, the world sometimes has people who seem troubling. In curing these thoughts of our own, I have found that the system or systems responsible simply don’t experience enough appreciation, care, consideration, love, and compassion. These living systems in ourselves are not too dissimilar from other people, who are made of similar systems.

Understanding this, and understanding the love one should cultivate inside oneself, one can understand how one can, in an honest way, love all people and life.

A lot of the issues regarding social anxiety arrive from issues of trust. It is because people often find that the ideas, advice, and the direction of others are incorrect in their own eyes, that people develop a sense of a lack of trust. If we are to understand the lack of trust more deeply, we may understand that it is, again, due to a perception of death. I believe that the pure notion of life does, itself, trust other life, but in this world, we are commonly damaged, and as such, we may express death, as well. The solution is to both understand this unfortunate common depression and anxiety of people, and to understand the solution to this is, again, the practice of a pure and truthful cultivation and understanding of life.

In understanding the manifest self, it is helpful to gain an appreciation for its various facets. In this article, I present a vision of the corpus callosum.

The corpus callosum is like a brilliant mall, paved with perfectly enunciated vocabulary. It glows with awe, symbolizing the desire of the mind. It only accepts strong connections, connections of truth that form the sacred agreement of the knowledge of the self through the differing personalities of the hemispheres of the brain.

At this glowing mall of importance and significance, a mall that never sleeps, important, self-defining exchanges take place. Always on, always glowing, the corpus callosum can be seen from the whole brain.

For those without a corpus callosum, the brain connects where it can, such as at the brain stem. Here, the voice likely has a higher priority, perhaps more regal than would be typical (possibly stemming from the ideas of centrality/focus and nearness to loudness, although these are simply menial conjectures).

The corpus callosum is a center of attention of the brain. Almost all of the communication is split between the hemispheres, without almost all of the communication traveling at the general brain stem and the corpus callosum. The brain stem is a primarily conduit; the corpus callosum is a captivating yet stilling center of stability.

It is perhaps the obligatory thoughts that many are faced with that build the corpus callosum. These are the thoughts that some find an inability to not think. Perhaps, the flow of information from the sides of the brain weren’t smooth and without confusion or indecision. Bright thoughts command the brain in certain ways. I’ve noticed, however, with a more peaceful and resolved communication in the brain, these thoughts become more subtle, and seem to simply glow as a connector within the brain. I see my corpus callosum there, glowing, where those thoughts used to be. While there are likely various aspects of thinking, all of which performing a sort of command to the mind, the inter-hemisphere communication seems to be of them.

It’s pleasant to have the stability of an expensive and sophisticated commercial establishment near the middle of your head.

It can be described as the psychological stopping point. There, once it’s on and paved, the mind just stops. It doesn’t stop thinking, but it stops moving around. The mind stays in place, existing in animation.

It’s kind of a weird feeling. It’s like, it stops, and you sort of automatically think, “well, what do I want to do,” and you don’t do anything. This is the sustainable state of the glowing corpus callosum (I’m being a little humorous; I’m sure there’s a better name).

Many people have searched for a state of thoughtlessness, and while discovering a well-managed corpus callosum doesn’t cover the gamut of the topic, it is quite significant. It seems that there may be possible a desperation of some sort regarding inter-brain communication, and organizing the thought such that the corpus callosum facilitates it is quite potentially a way to calm one’s mind and reduce the violence of thinking. This state of mind that I refer to is the common notion of the state of “I don’t know” or the state of “thoughtlessness” (not exactly indicating mute brain, but a serene one, instead, perhaps). I know many people have questioned in their search, wondering why they couldn’t be thoughtless.

With enlightenment comes an ability to nicely self-organize, and it may very well be that understanding and perceiving the health and quality of the corpus callosum is an important element in understanding one’s own cognition. It may takes a mild amount of (pleasant) maintenance, but it’ll may alleviate a variety of jerky thoughts, which are then no longer necessary, as the corpus callosum will be able to smoothly facilitate inter-hemisphere communication.

The corpus callosum is very nice. They say it has a huge number of connections.

Once common perception is a ball of light at the center of the head. What I think one is actually (possibly) seeing is the manifestation of the idea of a center. While this center may not technically exist, due to the neurological gap between the hemispheres, the cohesion brought about by the notion of centrality may evoke this perception. Much of it may be due to the illumination of the corpus callosum. It may be that thoughts become brighter due to their allure, suggesting importance and salience. If there is trouble, then thinking may increase in brightness. The understanding of the corpus callosum can perhaps resolve some of the possible aggravation that may occur due to an irregular communication structure between the hemispheres.

It would be good to look up pictures of the corpus callosum. I think you can find it in your head, and remembering the hemispheres don’t connect is very helpful to calibrating internal perspective.

The whole drug war is the wrong approach to surely a real situation; misinformation, distrust, and separation are quite damaging to the mind of the people.

Additionally, the pharmaceutical and medical industry’s inability to facilitate spiritual wellness in the case of depression (even if it is not quite our modern enlightenment), which is tied to every disorder, is very disheartening.

I am unaware of any synthetic cannabinoid or similar medicine that competes in safety, reliability, applicability, and effectiveness at treating the core of happiness. Cannabis is not a forward-pushing, excitement-oriented, solution to unhappiness. Instead, it is a holistic feeling of self-incorporation and self-understanding.

Yes, without the true teachings of enlightenment, it cannot bring true enlightenment, but I think it has the ability to heal damaged communication connections within the body — a common problem, which may be due to a lack of variety of signals that we receive, which give our minds less resources (think useful patterns) to function. Without these connecting sounds, smells, and other cues, that we may have, in the past, found in nature, portions of our minds find difficulty in communicating, causing a type of darkness brought about by non-communication.

Think about how a song can get stuck in your head. This song signifies a network in your mind that is helpful and which facilitates your desires. It is a convenient and useful connection. Considering the theory that the environment in which the body evolved into its modern state is still a preferred environment in which to reside (the Paleo theory), the various cues in nature are like the songs that get stuck in your head, but they’re of much greater variety and substrate. Without those, my theory is, we don’t feel internally well-connected.

When you lose these connections in your mind, you may seem more focused, which can be helpful, but you may also feel less imaginative and creative, because the conversations that occurred, due to previously existing connections, do not occur much any more. I think cannabis aids the person in re-establishing these connections, and with a greater breadth of neural connections, a greater breadth of internal conversation and thus creativity emerges.

A possibly more healthy way of being would be to surround ourselves with an environment similar to our paleolithic ancestors, and to practice activities in similarity, as well. Incorporating our modern ways of health, we could potentially find a lifestyle that stimulates the mind in a more healthy way.

Unfortunately, this is impractical. While, in that case, the general need that cannabis fulfills may not exist, or, at least be substantially lessened, due to the stimulation of the senses and thus thoughts in a way that is natural to our evolved form, our modern lifestyle choices leave us without this possibility. Therefore, it seems that due to our deadened and skewed environment, cannabis is a wonderful solution to lacking jubilant cognitive self-interaction.

There is a notion that the general ingestion of psychoactive substances should be avoided, in order to adhere more closely to a supposedly natural way of being. However, since we have altered our natural environment and lifestyles quite substantially, there is a lot more that distances ourselves from existing totally naturally, as the body had once evolved to do. Such philosophies may be considered inconsiderate, as they consider only a narrow set of features and observations of the mind.

Even in accordance with the restriction of drug or medicine usage to dire circumstances, there is no alternative for cannabis. While superficially, there are medicines which treat similar symptoms, more experientially, it is obvious that they do not possess the sublime quality and effect of cannabis. So far, nothing can mimic or replace its effects, at least not in the foreseeable future.

What exactly is the worry anyway? It’s hugely popular, is often reported to have majority support, and is widely incomparably more effective and sustainable than pharmaceutical serotonergic (and perhaps epinephrine-mediated) enhancers.

One may notice that modern medicinal happiness is fueled by reports from fidgety people, eyes on the possibility of happiness, micro-giggly with excitement and pursuit, saying that they feel happier, but not indicating any feelings of a determination and connectedness with the truth of life, and an awareness and deep acceptance of its meaning. Such illusory data gathering methodologies fuel more baseless excitement but fail to answer the pressing questions of holistic, connected, and spiritual wellness.

There’s only one plant in the whole world of our societal awareness that can effectively, comfortably, and consistently provide feelings of spiritual health and glowing wellness. No other plant or drug can bring what is probably at least 99.9% of people out most forms of depression, in just a few months of intermittent or casual usage.

In just one hit, the brain starts to communicate, realizations that were missing behind obstruction become revealed, pipes of thoughts begin flowing, fully and with life, you finally can talk to yourself again, you feel relieved, this is exactly what you needed, say so many.

It really appears that, medicinally speaking, there’s only one medicine or drug in the world that can nearly universally cure anyone of doom and the silent crackling of broken lines.

Considering the expected maturity of your fellow brethren, I would say that it’s obvious and without a doubt that cannabis should, expediently, be legal. Its illegalization is and was a great oversight — suspiciously appearing like a fall to a rapturous elitist Satan while overseas strangely similar mentalities were occurring — control and control one another.

With an ironically cheap elitist prestige, these demons killed what may be the world’s favorite thing. With lucky-brain disorder, and a suspiciously supported pattern of Luciferianism and Satanism, these influencers of our world’s past may have literally committed treason against the human race and our true intentions (which is to find a way for us to live well).

It should go without saying that cannabis is far too valuable to remove from the people’s rights. It should be obvious something this supported should be legal even with a 35% majority of a largely uneducated group, considering the ideas and beliefs behind it. If it is literally that awesome, outshining so much, then why do that to people?

People who smoke weed commonly drink less alcohol. That’s hugely healthy. Lung performance is very often good or, sometimes, even better than people who don’t smoke weed (interestingly).

Cannabis is a customizable experience, with plenty of different useful chemicals, working together like an intentional machine, giving it both science and variety; discussion and passion.

If you could attempt to create the perfect drug, as is surely an idea in the pharmaceutical industry, I would bet that you wouldn’t make something as good as cannabis. Cannabis almost has secrets to what you truly wanted, like it knew you a long time ago, perhaps at a time in your evolution when these features were more expressed.

Now, I don’t believe in controlling people, but I also don’t believe in letting sin and mistake rule society (the precursor to controlling people). I don’t believe in disregarding healthy nature, and I don’t believe in ignoring truth. I don’t believe that we all need the same things, either.

Voting can be annoying. What if instead of the binary voting system, there were a fully connected communication infrastructure, connected to everyone, comfortably and with respect and courtesy. It would let everyone know and communicate, in an organized and comprehensible way, all of what everyone thinks — not just thoughts, but ongoingly through discussion, as the participants of the system develop true understanding.

But instead, we have a system designed to be particularly resilient to utter failure, but in added resilience, understanding and specificity are diminished.

Billions of ones and zeros, all over the world, about prescribed topics. For relatively unknown reasons, these ones and zeros chose our way to the future. Everyone has but a binary word to say to the separatist government. (“Yes” or “No” on provided questions.)

Voting is so narrow-band, so outdated, so unreliable, vulnerable, and slow.

That’s my party then; a well-designed communication system is necessary to any satisfactory government, given our present-day circumstances.

Then onto why cannabis can be bad. It’s not perfect, it’s just great and irreplaceable. You still need to have knowledge, and you still need to know good words. It won’t necessarily prevent adherence to Satanic behavior, but if the intention is there, it can make a world of a difference. That’s about all it is; it’s very helpful and irreplaceable but it’s important to also have true knowledge (not simply misaligned books — instead, real and concrete understanding, connected to the source of life, the reason why anything is important).

The cannabis plant can be tailored in different ways to accommodate the user. There is a breadth of variety in subjective feelings regarding it. For many, cannabis helps work, as the adage may go, “a happy person is a happy worker.” Some people may find themselves unfocussed while high, and this may be solvable from a psychological perspective; the experience of an unsettling nature can stem from an insecure attainment of the fundamental knowledge of reality — an error which separates one from the primary state of being.

It would be good to bring some spirituality and love into common society. It would be good for people, guided or misguided, to become familiar with the class of substances known as “entheogens,” which are drugs which facilitate spiritual insight and the related emotions. Cannabis brings about both of these possibilities.

There is an important question, on the legality of psychedelics. While I may see a strong, overt community of real psychedelic users as being a benefit to our society, with their rigor and focus, society cannot cognizantly make that decision without any experience whatsoever with entheogens. Without the safety of executive assurance, the independently spiritual community can never surface into public awareness, as these patterns of thinking are banned in society. With the legalization of cannabis, the world will be introduced to the independently spiritual, independently thinking community and their lessons, as everyone will then finally be able to openly know and understand each other (without the present shade).

Additionally, do you want to be left with only 1600+ year old religions written at seriously different times than now? It’s beautiful that religion is still spawning, from the original question itself, like there was a mysterious fountain of rebirth somewhere.

Cannabis legalization will allow the people to gain a natural and developed awareness of the idea of a drug aiding in the pursuit of spirituality, which will finally allow the people to understand this enormous movement of spiritual devotion associated with the use of entheogens. (And then the general populous can make cognizant decisions regarding the matter.)

Many intelligent people have fought on the intellectual battlefield focused on the meaning and importance of psychedelics. Through the unintentional brutal onslaught of Heaven’s defenses against misinformation, they fought, seeking to be good in the grace of the being that they had become more familiar with than sayings would allow, attempting their best at making sense of this mysterious prospect and potential — seeking to speak the truth of something which no one has been able to figure out for so very long.

It would seem, to them, that being able to explain these astonishing findings would open up a brand new opportunity, awareness, and healing for and of the human race (and animals may benefit as well). There have been, for a very long time, almost entirely debatable ideas, with glimpses of truth, but nothing pleasingly connected — admirable attempts that fell short of Heaven’s true glory.

Maybe it is true. If we could understand enlightenment (psychedelics seem to cover this subject — it’s another unique facet of this physiologically harmless category of drugs — still though, I think they only present a past enlightenment, which while helpful, is not exactly the one we need), then perhaps the world would understand psychedelics.

Considering these thoughts, I think it is unethical to treat people as if they are too stupid to be able to use marijuana in a way that they deem is helpful to themselves, and to go so far as to inflict fear and retribution into the users of this often spiritual, and often alcohol-avoidant substance. This process of evil division separates people, police, and government — causing popular hatred against the very people who are supposedly risking their lives to bring peace.

Expounding on that topic, do you realize how much animosity, fear, and distrust the government has enforced between the people and the police and government, because they illegalized one of, if not the most, popular drugs in the entire world, and even possibly the most popular activity of personal enjoyment in maybe all of creation?

Making it popular to hate the police? Even by highly aware and intelligent, sometimes influential people? Not noticing “High Times,” is noticeably a popular favorite. Not taking evidence of its benefits and effects seriously, so much that people just think the police are stupid? I know this occurs due to some other drugs, and sometimes reasonably, but they pale in comparison to how much distrust and animosity has been generated through cannabis illegalization, resulting in one of the most popular trends out there — hating the police after the realization that cannabis is good — and it’s huge in college — our nation’s future earners.

And now we have the internet to boot. Every time a police department posts on facebook about their huge marijuana bust, thousands of people respond, jeering and heckling the department. It makes the government look hypocritical.

Is cannabis a good recreational community? Yes

Is a well-formed and stable cannabis community a much better experience than the currently long-lived alcohol community? Yes

Is cannabis compatible with an entirely well lifestyle? Yes

Do people popularly enjoy cannabis, and frequently would smoke or otherwise ingest it anyway, despite illegality? Obviously — High Times was out before legalization begun.

Are we talking about just “any drug?” No, cannabis is differentiated by outstanding qualities.

Does legal cannabis and its effects on our society present an opportunity for growth, intelligence, and awareness? Yes, understanding this important facet of our nature — to take very specific drugs or sacraments to aid in spirituality — would be beneficial to understand on a more personal and familiar basis, and by actually being able to see the developed realization of the long kept underground community — a community that often teaches the precious teachings of the ancient sages (Buddhism, etc).

Of course, there are the non-communal types of users, who are interested simply in its beneficial effects, but I’ve noticed that there’s a trend to become inquisitive and open to understanding (another trend hardly unnoticeable).

You may think that cannabis philosophy is just “wrong,” but what it is, I think, is a healthy and curious connection, communication, and understanding that goes on in the mind, entertaining ideas of divine splendor, knowing it’s a good thing to do — often the feeling of innocence emerges, as one can freely entertain ideas and memories, knowing the right interpretation, which is innocence and is easier to see when there’s a lot of active intelligence. People come to wrong conclusions frequently, but primary knowledge is the most difficult knowledge, so it’s understandable.

Also, there are two types of people; enlightened (or moving toward it), and unenlightened. There’s no necessity for unenlightenment. We don’t live in a world where we can fathom real monsters, so I figure everyone is curable, ultimately (especially when there is a cure).

What the DEA movement is primarily concerned about is the combined effects of Satanic responsibility and intoxicating substances. Because we have lost the divide between sinful and holy, we cannot properly see responsibility and as thus, all people are affected by the zeal of cautious politeness, indicating that the discrimination of responsibility is no longer a reliable method of order and light.

Additionally, the invitation to true acceptance has been jammed by the aberration of the original lessons and the excited, but likely hasty, move towards a future of more, blending holy and unholy and confusing people, leaving no illuminated destiny and guidance, and delivering widespread damage to the invisible psyche.

If no one were Satanic (including Luciferian), we wouldn’t have criminal problems. Isn’t that a better choice than an overzealous institutional figure raining on your divine experience?

Let us remember that the religions have not generally been specifically very hateful against drugs. This hate is not primarily coming from religion, just real Satanism born of fear and an irrational savior.

Reasonably, I imagine, long ago, that small communities could better self-manage, however, their systems could not scale well at all, permitting stronger diversions of ideology coming from the resulting inadequate communication and understanding system. The drug war is out of fear, for fear of the Satanist, and the belief that a diet free from drugs is the cure to Satanism (again, a common problem, unfortunately so).

Let me tell you what professional mental advice really is. It’s a rare technology — coveted, protected, and held close in a mostly dark world, as it’s a rare thing indeed — a potential cure for ailment; something hard to come by these days.

Now let me tell you what it’s not. It’s not right.

It’s actually often misconceived and wrong about things. It’s tossy and turny, without fortitude of assuredness. It’s all your world could afford.

Our current civilization, as if not taken aback by the destruction of Babylon, has been climbing a rocky structure, bolting to a new surface once its seen, fastening tightly to it, so our mind is zig-zagged; we go this way too much, then another way too much, ongoingly, yet (hopefully) steadily increasing in general accuracy — with waves of resolution following loud chaos.

I don’t need to state the importance of enlightenment much. It’s one of the most commonly known things in the universe.

Of course we won’t have the worry of “what’s Satan going to unpredictably do,” with enlightenment, so then it’ll all be obvious (think a truly enlightened and refined variant of libertarianism), but for now, the world is ready for cannabis — aided feelings of divine presence 101, if you notice that kind of thing.

Reality is an angel of ours, too, a part of an even greater self than the body, a part of all that which sustains us, and I don’t think the path to enlightenment is the path of self-defeat, like is often found in asceticism, but a path of incorporating intelligence found internally and externally, throughout existence, past and future, to bring life to all life, and a natural cessation of death.

Some may say it’s a dance of angels.

At the ultimate origin of all existence is the everlasting being of possibility, which I term, the “Word.” The first instance of its manifestation was knowledge of its existence.

Manifestation was originally knowledge of the divine. It was a memory of reality that began it all (when polarity became distinct, allowing for knowledge, which dictates right and wrong).

Because of this original nature of reality, manifesting into knowledge, it is certainly possible, and perhaps we can say this with an amount of jubilee, that manifest reality is firstly founded on memory.

The simplest manifestation of reality is memory. It is likely improbable that reality would evolve spontaneously into a suddenly complex form, skipping the fundamentals of cognition, yet incorporating them anyway, as that could imply a distinctly different nature of understanding and being than we are intuitively aware of (or comfortable with — we expect reality to exist in a sensible and methodical form).

Additionally, the recurring story of a paradise before this one also suggests that this incarnation of reality is not our first. To sentience, the desire for well-being is natural, so to be born in a world that is unnatural (commonly not supportive of well-being), would suggest that there is a special undertaking going on.

In the common (and probably intuitive) story of Eden, a paradise and existence before this one, the inhabitants of Eden would learn about “being God,” and they will find pain and difficulty (and quickly embarrassment, probably knowing of the judgement of others). In this new world Satan will no longer be considered high, but instead low, likely as what was a beautiful fire of distraction and whim becomes a frighteningly dangerous way of being or thinking.

All this suggests is that our reality — the way our mind is constructed and the lessons that it is occupied with — is evolving over periods of time. This evolution likely all stems from the most fundamental manifestation of reality, which is the simplest form of manifestation and is resolute memory (knowledge).

If this reality is fundamentally knowledge, then if we could accurately and safely write on the knowledge, then we would have supreme power, to fly or whatever. Surely, there must be safeguards, and what I imagine these safeguards are, is the inability to accurate write what you want, on this memory of reality, due to being internally inaccurate.

Reality being fundamentally memory is a plausible interpretation of reality, it is intuitively acceptable, and provides an understanding of consonant awareness.

All of this becomes even more plausible when you consider that a sentient reality would allow for uninhibited self-expression, giving to every will and whim of a truly living being.

And all of this means you can fly! If all of this is true (and these are my preferred beliefs — the headache reduction is bountiful!), then you will need total accuracy (no inaccuracy, whatsoever), and then you will be perfectly coherent in mind and being, and after that, I imagine that you will be able to fly and if not, you’ll be able to see what’s going on that prevents you (perhaps an ancient agreement of ours which predicates contingencies for our current manifestation of reality, formed from an agreeable purpose, that would prevent something like flying, likely only temporarily).

Eventually living in a world comprised of memory seems foreseeable.

Possessing knowledge and understanding generally modifies demeanor. With enlightenment, as with many fields of understanding, there are certain characteristics which indicate this understanding. Upon communication, one implies an ideological direction. This ideological direction is felt and perceived. Thusly, Satanism can be easily noticed in speech and action, as a person can generally pick up on an evil ideological direction, which would be a direction which promotes need over divinity.

The foundation of enlightenment is to be in the original, default state, which entails an appreciation of Creation. It is to undo the wrongs of the past that have caused us damage, so that the mind is in good function — healthy, alive, and aware. It is to express oneself without death, to be alive, independent in identity, yet connected to the conscious mind of the eternal Word (the self of Creation — a living yet intangible being of possibility, unseen today and seen tomorrow).

It’s almost to say that enlightenment has no effect, as it is the default state of the mind. The finding or attainment of enlightenment rests primarily in resisting and remedying failures that are often promoted in the world, that the mind accidentally took for benevolent. There is a long history of differentiating Satanic behavior from holy behavior, but due to the lack of understanding commonly found, this differentiation has been ambiguous and problematic. That makes our modern ability to understand the differences between Satanic and holy or righteous behavior more ambiguous, debatable, and hard to really understand.

Understanding the composition of evil, from a previous topic, we find that it makes sense that an enlightened person would be aware of the precise nature of evil.

With the observation of demeanor, understandings held by the observed progressively become apparent. Therefore, there certainly exists a sign of awareness. Satanism is characterized by a persistent desire to chase a light. It is an obsession with need, although seen by the Satanic being as a desire for something apparently great. It results in a generation and perpetuation of need, and is noticeable. Frivolous provocations become the focus of communication, and intelligent dialog diminishes.

Conclusively, there are some patterns of behavior that do not resemble enlightenment. Luciferianism and Satanism, when pronounced enough, can be clear indicators of no knowledge of enlightenment (no traction, at the very least).

Luciferianism and Satanism are the patterns of behavior that lead to pain, so we should avoid them.

We are without pain when all of our sentient memories are living well; we are in pain otherwise. Be aware of the pain, even if it is miniscule — that is a type of emergency that may be able to be solved with care and consideration. Remember to teach yourself these lessons — don’t depend on your seeing eye to be able to do everything.

Aside from not choosing evil (through self-abandonment or misinformation), the clearest sign of enlightenment is through explanation and discussion. If you clearly understand enlightenment, then it would be obvious. I have found enlightenment to be able to be understood and defined in concrete ideas and terminology, making it satisfyingly unambiguous in its nature.