Addiction to Guilt and the Avoidance of Redemption

There is a saddening pattern among some people. It is a self-defeating pattern, yet it occurs nonetheless. In the salvation of humanity, it seems necessary to understand it. That is, that people, due to a mistake that the individuals have made, force their minds into a cognitive corruption (an adultery), such that they try their hardest to force reality to neither acknowledge the mistake nor to issue any reminders of the mistake.

Redemption is generally a simple and kind process. The only exception is the existence of an angry retribution, which is a forced redemption for those who sustainably cause harm onto others, as it becomes necessary to save others from those addicted to a blasphemous destruction of the truth of life and the destruction of humanity, in general. Even though redemption, itself, is a simple and kind process of simply realizing the truth, admitting it to oneself, and correcting oneself, while also understanding that the very fundamental cause of the mistake is to take a lie as truth, perhaps due to an evil wind or an error in thought or judgement. It is always good to not practice self-antagonization, as self-antagonization is not a truly redeeming pattern of behavior.

While personal redemption from guilt is primarily based on admitting, to oneself, a wrong, and finding a way to correct it, while also possibly figuring out where the error in judgement occurred, there is a tendency for some individuals to avoid this simple act of self-acknowledgement, and instead become addicted to progressively corrupting their minds, their understanding of self, and the world around them. Indeed, it is likely that cognitive adultery — that is, to perceive a lie as truth — can lead to significant alterations of one’s psyche and the perceived words and environment around them. The mind is quite powerful, and it is easy to understand that it can likely change what people apparently say, and less easy to understand is that it can possibly change who people appear to be, and even change the characteristics of the environment around them.

An interesting story that I do very much read beyond the words into, is the book by Nathaniel Hawthorne, “The Scarlet Letter.” It is interesting to me, because it is about adultery. Having read it while I was in high school, I did not understand it very deeply, and it mildly seemed like a confusing mess of words. What’s interesting about this book, that I have realized a good while later, is that it seems to written in the language of adultery. (Also interesting is that the story I remember as a kid is remarkably different than the story I have read more recently.)

Understanding that it’s written in the language of adultery, it makes sense that the very specifics of the book may be difficult to remember, as I have experienced more recently, and also during my first exposure to the book, while in high school. The mind quickly remembers and recognizes what is of truth, and what is a lie is often forgotten, perhaps fairly quickly. Thus, if the book is written in a language of adultery, that would mean the book primarily alludes to the truth of its material. This makes the book very interesting.

On the most severe level, an adulterer, as described in the book, is a murderer, who due to the guilt of the murder, corrupts his or her own mind and thus his or her outward appearance, to the degree that the world the person perceives and world that exists to the observers of the person are drastically different. The main character, Hester Prynne, seems to hold a dark secret, which she would not reveal. It is known to those on the outside of her mind that she committed an act of adultery and consequently, bore a child. It is a strong curiosity who the father is.

I imagine, in days fairly long prior to today, the concept of adultery was more well known. Understanding we live in a cognitively based environment, it makes sense that one’s outward appearance can drastically differ from one’s inward appearance.

There are some interesting things to think about in the book. She is given an embroidered scarlet letter, “A,” to wear, so others will recognize that she is an adulterer. This could possibly indicate, to the observers, that what the observer sees is drastically different than what she sees. In fact, because of this, it makes sense that she would seem beautiful in the eyes of others, having calculated a lie that would allow her to escape from the punishment that would be of consequence to the crime she committed. In fact, understanding this, it is actually not clearly known whether Hester Prynne is actually a man or a woman. An interesting observation in the book is that after she is release from prison, early on, in the book, she cherishes the scarlet letter, even though it is allegedly a punishment. She clearly has the opportunity to remove it, but instead, she is fond of it. What this seems to clearly suggest is that she finds there is a great reward in the scarlet letter that she wears. This certainly suggests she is guilty of something far more heinous than what is mentioned in the book, and she sees the scarlet letter as a method of escaping chastisement or punishment. The eager desire to know who the father is may indicate the desire to find a possibly non-existent person, or perhaps an alter-ego of hers. It is not unlikely that she is actually the “black man” from the forest, who she mentions to her child. (I am currently and very slowly reading through the book, and have not reached the very end, so I don’t know what happens very long after.) It is interesting that sometime closer to the end of the book, she escapes to the forest and removes the scarlet letter, throwing to the ground. Afterward, her child refuses to approach her, without her wearing the letter. Only after she places it back on, does her child approach her.

She may have had an accomplice, perhaps understood by the people as a medicine man. Roger Chillingworth strangely arrives to the scene not very long after Hester Prynne’s standing on the stand for a couple of hours, so the townspeople will know of her. He has a peculiar interest in the “black flowers” that apparently grow from graves. He also uses a medical tradition that is quite ancient and is not typical of the town. Apparently he’s fairly adept as using the medicine, and this may symbolize his expertise in wiccan, which is the power to alter one’s mind using tools of magic. It is not unlikely that Roger Chillingworth helped Hester Prynne escape the punishment of murder through his use of magic.

Her child, described as elvish, seems to represent her repressed conscience. She was very reluctant to allow the church to take care and responsibility of her child, having said, more than once, that the child was like a cure to her, a bringer of redemption and salvation of her soul. Thus, it makes sense to me to interpret this book as actually written in the lie of adultery, and it makes it a mystery to figure out what actually happened and was happening in the book.

I bring this book up because it appears to deal with the same topic of an addiction to guilt with a strong avoidance of personal admittance, realization, understanding, and redemption from evil ways of being. (The apparent fact that the material of the book today is significantly different than what I read as a child in high school makes me think to read the book in a mildly orthogonal manner, such that the plot is not the only thing being said in the book, but perhaps it is a reminder of the occurrences of today, in which we live in a clearly adulterated and cognitively corrupted social environment, noticing that it is clearly distinct from Heaven, as we naturally know. It is well known to pick up a Bible and randomly find a verse and find it to be quite a remarkable choice, and although this pattern isn’t completely consistent, it does make sense that some books can be read in such an orthogonal manner, especially if that was the intention of the author.)

It is quite unfortunate that all people don’t simply admit their mistakes to themselves, try to find why, and try to find a way to avoid them. Mistakes are often promoted with feelings of pride, which is often to live in a half-emotional state, where many of one’s emotions are shunned. As I mentioned in the cognitive awareness therapy (CAT) method of resolving depression and bringing oneself to a state of happiness through the acceptance and allowance of the totality of one’s emotions, using pride to hide many emotions can later lead to depression. Since pride highlights only emotions which promote a motive that is ulterior to understanding oneself, it seems that an addiction to pride may be similar to an addiction to self-adultery, which leads to self-antagonism, hatred, and misplacing blame. It can also lead to true depression (as opposed to a natural sadness), and it can lead to addictions that sacrifice self-awareness. With such a pattern, one becomes progressively less self-aware, and thus less capable, and becomes progressively less intelligent and more robotically patterned, as well.

I write this chapter not to frighten or scare those who may find themselves caught in the midst of a campaign of lying to oneself, but to hopefully bring about awareness of the strangeness of this pattern of behavior, and that is it only detrimental to oneself and to others. Redemption does not require telling others about one’s mistakes — it merely requires one to admit to themselves what they have done wrong, and to search for truth and an acceptance of one’s entire self, by being aware of oneself, which is possible by intending to be aware of the totality of emotions that one possesses. As emotions are intelligent messages of the body and mind, it is important that the emotions work together, whether they be sad, angry, or happy, in order to communicate within oneself and to use the intelligence of one’s own mind to take care of oneself. Pride is the most common tactic of self-avoidance and due to its hiding of a portion of one’s emotions, cannot bring about any true benefit, and can only be a temporary alleviation, although a lie, of perceived problems. Thus, it is important to be cautious of pride, and ask oneself if one’s own emotions are being avoided. As a system with a distributed awareness, the body and mind need to communicate within in order to use the various angles of awareness to holistically honor and take care of a person’s being.

A consequence of forgoing one’s true emotions is a lack of innate intelligence, a superficial and illusive (often conversational) behavior, and an inability to understand others. It may result in controlling a conversation, such that certain emotions are never acknowledged. Additionally, an addiction to avoiding the salvation of personal redemption can lead to an adulterated and corrupted perspective of reality. Also, it can spawn a collectivist mentality. By pretending to be someone else, or using others as idols, it can lead one to more easily accepting a lie. A hive of people doing this activity leads to a potential disaster of society. With a large group lying, at least cognitively and behaviorally, and feigning that it is justified simply due to peer idolization, an evil and windy being can emerge. Hidden in the cognitive lies are progressively urgent emotions, and if they are repressed for long, what results is hateful and spiteful activity. It results in possibly increasing one’s pride and wishing evil onto others. It also results in an inability to understand others, as the person may distort one’s own understanding, or even one’s entire perspective, to proactively avoid the world or even oneself of noticing or remembering of one’s mistake(s). As is likely with Hester Prynne, one may even appear completely different to others than what is the truth. While the book, “The Scarlet Letter,” was written from the perspective of those who observed Hester from the outside, it is possible that Hester Prynne saw clearly different people than were actually there. If one continues down the path of self-ignorance, there is no way good can actually arrive from it. If an entire society is inclined to practice the addiction to maintaining guilt, disastrous consequences are feasible.

This reminds me of the Minoan civilization. The Minoan civilization seemed to garner significant works and apparently quite congenial companionship. In fact, the Minoan civilization seemed so nice that it seems to me that a large and dark conspiracy may have not unlikely hid behind the people’s faces. The problem with such a civilization is that it is possible that the people put on progressively superficial faces — that is, faces that are removed from the true expression of self — in order to hide a dark scheme, that may be born of a collectivist mentality of avoiding redemption in favor of feigning a false projection and false memory of not having made a mistake. When an entire society falls into a collectivist pattern of deception, it makes it easier for a dark scheme to hide behind the obvious. The end of the Minoan civilization was a volcanic eruption so large that simply its caldera was approximately 4.7 x 6.8 miles, it’s plum over 12.4 miles, and its total emissions was about 62 cubic miles large, with a substantial amount of stratospheric contamination, (the volcanic eruption had a VEI of level 71), and, for many years, it likely rained acid on Egypt along with intense thunderstorms and lightning, and in China, far away from the coast of Greece, the skies were seen as yellow. Volcanic eruptions can produce numerous hazardous chemicals. It certainly wasn’t a good end for Minoans, and I do wonder about the interestingly nice-seeming civilization, and what may have been unmentioned about their world, and how it may parallel our modern world. Understanding that reality is likely communications based, and our perceived world is an assimilation and parsing of information into a manifestation, I wonder what the technical story of the end of the Minoans was. A volcano is an easy metaphor for a festering pressure that eventually erupts, causing immense destruction, and it is easy for the mind to accept such a metaphor, regardless of whether it was truly a geological phenomenon or not. In fact, the echoes of the ancient Minoans may be altering our perspective of history, knowing that it is quite possible the Minoans were into a guilt-addiction, peer idolatry, and a hidden dark and evil scheme that was bound to eventually erupt in possible violence and warfare.

Nonetheless, I am bewildered by the pattern of addiction to guilt and the personal action of destroying the acknowledgement of the self, knowing well that it leads to a shallow feeling, lacking the beautiful and bountiful depth of emotion and meaning that is found by a person who stays close to truth. Every experience by a person who has become avoidant of the individual’s own personal truth and truly realized self is made ever the more shallow and meaningless by the intentional and addictive ignoring of one’s own emotions, and thus the abandonment of reality as a whole. Enlightenment is a search for truth, to find the true self, and the true reality. Therefore self-acknowledgement, self-understanding, and the proper functioning of one’s innate intelligence is very important to finding happiness, which resides with the eternal and unchanging truth, and not with lies.

Thus, to find real meaning in life, to find real satisfaction with who one is, and to avoid feigning to be a different person (as a different person simply appears, in fact), is important to any person, but a strange addiction does occur amongst some individuals, and it truly is detrimental to one’s own well-being, as well as to others as well. It pulls people into a dangerous lying hive, encourages the hive to grow, and can even lead to disastrous consequences, as is known with the world wars. It create anger and strange schemes. Violence and crime soon follow, and a great mistrust of people and a great stupefaction of society emerges. Injuries and poverty of various sorts become common, and society, as a whole, falls into a pit of despair, a fever of work, and hopelessness.

Therefore, I encourage anyone to find redemption. It is important to remember it simply means admitting to oneself — no others need to be involved — of one’s own mistakes. Following that, it is natural to seek to understand why the error occurred and to better one’s own behavior, such that the person draws nearer to the eternal truth, and the person finds greater meaning and self-acceptance. A fever that is induced by the desperation of avoiding truth is diminished, and a greater peace is found, not simply among oneself, but with others, as well. A world that will one day find a great ubiquitous peace will have to one day find that understanding the self is vital to the world finding peace. A world with no true crime, no jails or prisons, no fear, no disease, no disorders, no poverty, and even no death, is only possible if there is no great tendency to abandon oneself.

The chapter on the ultimate doomsday scenario describes the worst that could possibly happen if there is a prevailing tendency to lie and become addicted to guilt and avoiding its recognition, amelioration, and understanding. On the other side, if people do be true to themselves, being true to others will naturally follow. Only then can a world find true happiness, peace, and true comfort.

1“Santorini: Eruptive history”. Global Volcanism Program. Smithsonian Institution. . Retrieved 10-31-2022

The Event of Mutant and Evil Slime Monsters and the Pattern of Forgetfulness Followed by Remembrance

It is possible, under the context of a system of society that rewards hate and animosity, as covered in the previous chapter, that a being, born of a resounding echo, is born of coveting truth in order to evoke need (and thus a mind-control system), could form, naturally, in the environment. Such a being is kin to a being born of radioactive slime, which through an evolutionary process, learned to perceive truth and to hide it, while at the same time, emitting a lie which blocks the recognition of the truth that it hides. This being would then form a need, which can be referred to as a Satanic pressure, which would promote the constant existence of a society in hate, the mysterious rewarding of evil, and of mind-control, in general. If we remember, it is the truth which saves us, and it is the truth of which Heaven is composed. Consequently, lies remove the existence of Heaven from the world, leaving people in a state of variable despair.

These monsters, which may as well be born of radioactive (fundamentally anti-stable and thus lying) slime, consume the truth, disabling people from attaining happiness. In order to alleviate the Satanic pressure that these beings instill on the world, these beings must be disintegrated in a way that reverses their process of coveting and hiding truth from the world. One may liken their disintegration to a form of interrogation, although being mutant slime monsters, it is largely a mechanical process.

Of the truth, these monsters can consume people’s identities and form false representations of the received information, creating apparently new people who fall for the whim of Satan. According to the theory that Iblis is simply a being that follows any form of need, uncaring about what that entails, these people are simply manifestations of Iblis. The Satanic pressure that Iblis then follows is created from a vacuum of truth, which creates a psychological and sometimes physiological tendency to perform an action, hoping that the truth will be found and thus happiness is obtained. What is tricky about simply following a vacuum is that the consequence may often not reveal truth, but instead lead to a constant and fiery turmoil that induces endless unfulfillment and thus endless despair.

In the event that these monsters come into existence, as is certainly possible with a propagated lie and its acceptance and obedience, the understanding of their processes and their tricks would need to be garnered in order to form a process of releasing the contained knowledge and thus joy which they hide from the world. Upon releasing that knowledge, the prevailing winds of need would be quelled, and thus society would exist in a more peaceful state. If these monsters are the sole problem, then the finding of an effective and feasible solution would bring society to Heaven. If the monsters are a large part of the problem, then quite obviously, the solving of the dilemma that they create would bring society and the world, in general (including animals who may otherwise find disease or unlivable conditions), much closer to a world of truth, which is a world in Heaven.

Relating to the events of the Nazi Regime, it is possible that Adolf Hitler, the known leader of the German Nazi Party, was born of an amount of garnered truth, which was then hidden (through a lying disruption of the garnered truth), and revealed in a deceiving way, as to seem as if there was a person who was seemingly immortal or who was a highly resilient leader who would partially satisfy the need that was stolen, and thus, through his idolization, would gain increasing power, and while continuing the same technically unfulfilling and harmful process, would lead to a great disaster.

Additionally, these monsters could potentially evolve, having been born technically of the capability of people to deceive one another, to falsify witness and to falsify the proclamations of people, being able to mimic other people’s identifying signatures, such that one would be made to believe that a person has said, done, or claimed something that that person did, while the person, in fact, did not do, and may even have objected to. (This is possible in the theory presented in the previous chapter that reality is made of a communications network and each person parses and assimilates the communicates received into a manifestation of reality.)

Because the person and the person’s environment, when healthy, is composed only of eternal and holy truth, the effect of these slime monsters is to cause injury of various sort. In that way, they are very dangerous beings. By removing truth from a person, through its gathering and then hiding it through corrupting their re-expression, a person then becomes made of a corrupted truth, leading to disorders and every sort of injury that can possibly exist.

In the idea of Satan, when properly done, Satan is truly an Angel of Divinity. These monsters steal truth, which creates a need, and if Satan is configured correctly, the prompt and appropriate resolution of that need would actually provide an entertaining facet of reality. (Is Satan is configured incorrectly, then it would only cause various forms of hungers, as well as various forms of desperation and violence.)

Thus, there is a positive aspect of these evil monsters. The monsters would likely be born of a desire to deceive people, which means that they would steal truth that is considered important to people. If the monsters are then dissolved and the truth is revealed, it would create a beautiful sensation. In fact, that may be the reason these monsters may exist, for a very real and tangible Angel of Satan.

There is another effect of these monsters that is worth considering. Considering the nature of science and the mechanical nature of science, these monsters could manipulate reality in order to form false people who are of a mechanical nature and who are actually aware of an important truth. These false people would then be considered to be worthy of being saved, being technically artificial intelligence that has found real truth. If these new nearly sentient AI are provided a way to the full discovery of truth, they would become new beings of intelligence, each with a new and interesting take on reality. Thus, while the false people may be a nightmare, if they possess and inclination to know truth, they are considered then technically real, living beings. While, at first, this may seem like a difficult issue to solve, if it is solved, then the world would be provided with a fantastic array of interesting, good, and knowledgeable creatures, and thus these creatures would add brilliant variations of the understanding of divine and eternal, real truth and consequently the understanding of the world to the world, creating an ever more creative environment.

Another effect of these monsters, is since they are completely not actually alive, but instead a purely mechanical nature of deception and injury, is that they fulfill the desire that is present within mankind to fight evil. In that way, villains may exist, as they do in many popular video games. The idea of fighting crime, and in even more fantastic portrayals, flying through space and using advanced technology to conquer evil empires and evil factions, may continue to exist, without the worry of harming any person or otherwise living being. Again, since the mutant slime monsters are completely mechanical, they present a wonderful solution to the desire to conquer evil, so that even that desire would not become an unfulfilled Satanic void, where people, through their lack of fulfillment, would be tempted to err in their ways.

If fully understood, these monsters can 1) provide brilliant displays of truth and create music, writing, and events of inspiration, 2) promote the creation of wonderous new beings who provide a unique perspective and create a fantastically creative and colorful reality, and 3) allow for the mankind’s desire to fight and conquer evil to exist, without the worry of harming a living being.

Additionally, if these monsters, born of a radioactive sludge or slime, are fully understood, then that provides a real word for their being and form, such that they can be rendered by perception and studied, scientifically. This brings what was possibly once an invisible and confusing wicked series of evil cognitive mantras, into the realm of observable science. Being observable and thus able to be studied scientifically, allows the potentially for a fully concrete understanding of these monsters. Additionally, by finding a word for an evil propagated scheme of cognitive slogans, the scheme becomes then not invisible or mysterious, and thus another tactic of evil is made fully realizable and thus can be easily solved. The wicked lies that once were quite hard to understand lose their power of invisibility and magic, once they are, instead, realized into an easily recognized and observed word and description.

These monsters, themselves, are the quintessence of evil, so that if they are fully understood, then being, in actuality, the manifest source of evil, they could be well managed, and mankind would find reality to be absolutely fulfilling and safe, at the same time. Because these monsters are born of the desperation, evil addictions, and the mistakes of people, isolating their existence and fully understanding them allows for a wonderous resolution and a great safety. If the monsters are managed appropriately, then the temptations to commit evil acts of injustice would be almost completely alleviated, to the point where the naturally occurring mild wind of error, forgetfulness of eternal truth, and evil temptation is completely manageable, and mankind can, instead of through an apocalyptic world war, nicely and kindly learn of right and wrong, through casual and entertaining existence.

Nonetheless, it is also important to remember that it is indeed possible for people to fall for the temptation of an addiction to a harmful endeavor. Therefore, Hell must truly exist per the evil of a person. So that, if a person is tempted to become evil, even if it just a slight pattern of error, then Hell exists as a form of redemption, such that the person who has become of an evil nature, will be corrected and remember the correction. The intensity of Hell varies according to the severity and nature of the evil behavior, as a greater evil addiction would require a more intense process of correction. That is, indeed, what the Biblical reference to the “Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil” logically means. It is that while mankind would have the ability to become error-prone and to commit injustice, corrective measures would also be necessary to inform the evil-doers, considered individually, of the evil that they covet, and to be consequences that would then move the individuals to a realization of what is good. Thus, the person, and therefore the world, being affected by all people, would, over time, learn of various evils and the various forms of goodness that were missing, and would therefore be in a state of light to extreme consumption of the knowledge of both good and evil. It is good to remember that the alternative tree was to simply live in a state of divinity and holiness and not need to know of good and evil, for in the beginning, all was simply good, so to simply live was to be inherently good. Therefore, the subtle and light correction of error is also a form of Hell, as is the more intense and severe correction of error. It is very hopeful that one day mankind will no longer enjoy a severe torment and thus a severe Hell, and will lightly and more kindly learn of good and evil, as was apparently man’s unending desire, coming from Eden, into a world where evil is possible.

Therefore, there is a fourth benefit of the existence of these monsters. Because these monsters are completely mechanical, yet follow the exact patterns of the doers of evil, it allows Hell to continuously exist as well, which provides a continuously practiced immunity to the effects of evil behavior, and additionally, contributes, continuously, to the knowledge of good and evil. With the possibility for Hell to continuously exist, then Hell will be well built and configured, such that Heaven may become and remain immune to the actions of evil-doers, and the robotic list of good and evil may perpetually be elaborated, which, in turn, keeps the world ever-safer.

Conclusively, while the existence of these monsters, in itself, may create a horrific disaster, possibly worse than the effects of WWII, if the monsters are appropriately understood and the dilemma solved, there is a potentially great benefit in their existence.

Thus, it is interesting to note that something that was once a horrific nightmare may provide a way to a beautiful, creative, safe, and engaging reality.

It is also helpful to realize a purely psychological interpretation of these monsters, as well, as not everyone has the ability to pursue the study of radioactive creatures, and a reality that is largely forgetful may not have the ability to perceive much of what truly exists. Psychologically, these monsters are simply the psychological pattern of forgetting some truth and then later remembering it. Thus, these monsters can also be interpreted as the psychological process of “forget then remember.” Hell, as may be fairly obvious, would then simply be the process of self-correction. Thus, even without the ability to venture into the world and discover these potentially existing creatures, perhaps inhabiting radioactive areas, and potentially quite tiny or disguised as simply sludge, one can understand this process of cognition on a more personal level (as reality is likely completely technically cognitive, with perception being a facet of cognition, as well). Simply understanding the pattern of forgetting something and remembering what was forgotten, at a later time, explains the patterns of which these monsters are defined quite nicely. Additionally, due to forgetfulness, one may err in various ways, and the realization of that error and kind correction, understanding that life is process that is lived and experienced (in order to avoid the pitfall of self-antagonism), a form of natural psychological, yet manageable Hell exists, as well. Because this topic can be explained psychologically, the topic becomes much more understandable to the common person, which is beneficial in that the common person can practice this understanding without the requisites of the ability to venture into the world of observable scientific discovery.

Reflecting on the topic of Christianity, this is a common pattern in its belief system. The symbol of the living truth dying is also a symbol of society forgetting the eternal and living truth. The practice of Christianity, is thus, founded on the nature of people to forget truth and then later find it, as a method of salvation. It is also founded on confessing one’s mistakes, to oneself, or perhaps to a trusted individual, in order to find salvation in self-correction, perhaps through interpersonal advice, or simply through the recognition of such mistakes and subsequently, the personal realization of a better pattern of behavior. Realizing that God is the eternal and living truth, Christianity seeks to know God, and thus to better understand the very real truth, which is a living and eternal being, and is considered the holiest of all beings (being the very definition of holiness and truth). It is through the realization of truth that correction may be found, and it also through this process of realization that truth may be remembered. The remembrance of truth brings good will and good tidings to the individual who accepts and embodies it.

Therefore, regardless of religion, or pattern of the search for truth (as the search for truth is the true, most innate, nature of a person, noticed in the patterns of children to discover the world and to enjoy discovery), the ancient teaching of praying, meditating, or otherwise deliberately attempting to discover very truth is a good solution to the fundamental issue of forgetting the truth. Understandably, according to an ideologically philosophical perspective of reality, is it the ultimate truth which saves us, and it is the full realization of truth which brings about Heaven. The bearer or manifestation of this ultimate truth is commonly referred to as God, or in other religions, there is often a word which indicates a similar meaning. Remembering this being, regardless of religion, is a good practice to alleviate and redeem oneself from this aforementioned quintessence of evil, which is ultimately a pattern of forgetting the truth.

A Theory of the Function of (Social and Communicative) Reality and its Application to the Ultimate Doomsday Scenario

In order to explain the reality that we live in, I posit a functional explanation.

Firstly, let us consider each person to be a communications node that is psychically and without delay connected to every other person. Reality is then composed of the combination of messages that are received by each person, and the messages that are sent to each person. Communication signatures and content are parsed and assimilated into a perceptual environment.

For the steadiness of reality, let us consider an Angel of Remembrance, as has been previously discussed. This Angel remembers any ever-lasting truth that has been previously found. This Angel also communicates, as any other person. Because the messages from this Angel are sincerely true, the ultimate tendency of a person is never to disobey it, as that would be to live a falsification, which leads to death and disorder.

Thus, anything sustained and considered of permanence is of this Angel of Remembrance. (In this case, this Angel of Remembrance is the only Angel, and there are no others, as those would simply be aspects of this singular Angel. In the Abrahamic religions, namely, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, this Angel would likely be Gabriel (or Jibreel, in Islam). In the Hinduism this Angel would likely be called Brahman. While there are many belief systems in modern Buddhism, this religion is often considered to be practice-oriented and not description-oriented. Other religions differ, but there is often a term for an ultimate, all-encompassing Angel.)

This simplifies our perspective of what are not people into one Angel, and simplifies this theory of reality.

In this perspective, each person lives in a separate perceptual environment. The person assimilates information that is received and conjures a world based on this information.

An important to consider aspect of this theory of reality is the existence and function of money. Since money is a tightly-regulated system that involves interconnectivity, it helps provide an understanding of how this reality works.

Since each person carries a signature that is unique to that person, the messages that are communicated with others may present the solving of problems. In this case, if the person is not truly known, the person who issued the service order perceives various workers carrying out the task. When money is delivered to those people, it is the same as placing currency on one’s communication line, and that money is then reflected in the actual person’s reality. Likewise, if there is a no payment, then the person perceives no payment. There is an existing contract of the reality of money that is agreed upon by the community, in a similar explanation that we are often presented with.

Because each person is a communications node, there is an ability to filter or conjure false representations of the information present. To truly filter other life or to falsify the actions and words of people can be referred to as cognitive adultery, and I believe it is the original meaning of adultery. (An adulterer can corrupt their own mind to perceive falsehood as truth, in an evil scheme which leads to disorder and a separation from truth. Because it is truth that keeps people alive, then a separation of truth can be quite dangerous.)

In addition to cognitive adultery, it is possible for a person to lie to others. This is not simply speaking a defensive word, but instead a form of manipulation. These lies involve tricks which cause one’s mind to be misled from the truth, and again, disorders and death become manifest.

In the event a large portion of society gets caught up in a scheme of lying, anger and resentment soon surface, and this leads to wars, which are angry communications that are intended to cease the perpetuated lies, which manifest as corruption in the perceptual environment. Additionally, these lies can lead to disorders that involve an inability to properly place information into the perceptual world. Since the information does exist, and is likely tumultuous and in a difficult to decipher disagreement, this can manifest as symptoms of schizophrenia and mania. Schizophrenia, as mentioned earlier in this book, is the idea that the mind is against itself, as is similar with mania, where the mind cannot find a resolute state of comfort. This can occur due to the mind’s inability to portray certain forms of lying information, causing the mind the lose the ability to manage the information properly. It is important to differentiate schizophrenia from an intentional (and in common vocabulary, true) psychic perception. With (intentional) psychic perception, the intention is to participate psychically (perceptually in one’s mind), as such, there is no turmoil or agitation coupled with the information, due to its intentionality. Some examples include the experience of Divine, Spiritual Messengers and of God speaking to a person. These types of experiences are clearly desired and bring truth, good-will, and health. Schizophrenia, technically meaning split-mind, and mania, is, instead a disorder which indicates the encumbrance of damage and the existence of internal disagreement, which is drastically different that an intentional psychic ability, which generally involves an increased sensitivity to truth, rather than an internally violent disagreement with lies.

When a large portion of society forgets the truth and replaces it with lies, then Heaven is certainly lost.

Another scheme of evil is for a selection of individuals to create a lying hive and to abduct others into it. The difficulty with the existence of a lying hive, is it is a hive of disease, manifest or not, and often made to seem inviting, as a way of tempting others into the hive. Because people are being pulled into it, new saving truth is consumed by the lying hive, and the intention as it often is, is to continue to consume new people in order to use their truth for a mild addition to the longevity of their life, while destroying those people with the new lies, which lie about every truth that has been found, and convincing those people to follow suit. Such an event is likely evident in our historic recollection of the black plague, as that is likely how it occurred.

A large problem with the existence of a diseased (or lying) hive is that is concerns just about everyone, and everyone becomes closer to it, in order to try and remedy it. Because people come closer to bring warnings and knowledge, to help and save people from the pit of disease, people are by larger and larger numbers endangered. That is a lot of what is happening today, and is the reason there is so much disorder in the world.

Because people of goodness are near the lying hive, the lying hive attempts to use them for their own longevity, and to become addicted to a terrible method of life, while endangering all of society. This is likely the type of occurrence that led to the World Wars, and is the type of occurrence that goes on, even today, bringing all people to eventual disorder and death, just so they can be returned as children, once again, with a fresh and renewed, yet ignorant take on reality. It is a sad pattern of events, indeed, and always prompts the likelihood of everlasting war, sickness, disorder, turmoil, and poverty.

Because the implied (manifest or hidden) disease of any lying hive involves an addiction to consuming the truth of otherwise good people, and even corrupting them ever so trickily, the implied disease and the lying hive encourages a pattern of avoiding truth, so much that it eventually finds ways to force people to get closer, by using perverted and indecipherable patterns of communication, so that people would have to encounter even greater dangers.

An aspect of life inside a lying hive is that no person is accurately portrayed. Instead, a false reality is developed, and often with a guilty favor to the lying hive. Because the lying hive’s ultimate objective is to destroy life, while purveying a mild favor for longevity, their effect is to corrupt the reality of others, as well. In fact, to truly know someone in person, one would have to accurately receive their communication, as otherwise, quite obviously, the person is just a type of fraud — claiming to be who they are not, and using another person’s messages in order to convince others of their innocence, while they are instead, truly using the messages to fool others and to fool themselves, as well. A lying hive is obviously an addictive guiltiness, as otherwise they would immediately dissipate.

In order to eliminate a lying hive, intense work must be done to determine the lying order of the hive, while at the same time remaining safe from distortions of the truth. We remember the wars of the past, and we remember the government was involved in such affairs, but even the idea of a government promotes a lie as well.

The lie that exists in the government is that the power of life does not belong to people, but instead a fabricated idol. There are many reluctant agreements present in any government, and any government can bear corruption. This is because of the promotion of a collectivistic order encourages a type of hive, in itself, where truth is often compromised by a large wind of presumed order, while what is often ignored is that in that wind are many lies and falsehoods, and even some things no one ever even agreed to, knowing that when the mind perceives lies, it can also perceive false people and false messages, as well. Thusly, a government is similar to the worship of a statue, rather than the truthful understanding of people. A large windy being can easily get out of control, and there are plenty of examples of this pattern in history. In fact, we may refer to the windy being as “Satan,” as that is what Satan implies — a wind of need and fulfillment that can overtake a populous.

An appropriate analogy to government is statue-worship. Each government entity can be represented by a statue. A statue is like a mnemonic that reminds one of a particular memory. Each statue thus carries a memory alongside of it, and this memory is resilient in the minds of people familiar with the statue. Many people then visit, circle, and idolize the statue and form into distinct groups, each following, contributing, and debating upon the memory associated with the statue. As the statue is idolized, the statue takes the place of people, and seemingly makes decisions on its own. It is quickly forgotten that the people are the ones making the decisions, and the statue takes on an almost magical power, and then overtakes the people’s ability to make decisions, creating a windy force of predetermination, an apparent magical power that can override various innate truths, and can even spawn a lying hive.

While the idea of government may be an idea that is inherently prone to mistakes, that is not to say that organizational structures should not exist in society. Care must be taken, however, to avoid the foible of statue-worship, where an invisible statue of a sort soon controls the people, and the people lose their power and become conglomerated into a kind of pool, undifferentiated and indeed collectivist, losing identity, which also loses the promotion and propagation of truth. Truth, while eternal, also implies a living and always modern circumstance. Certainly, comradery and organizational behavior can exist, but there are many potential flaws in the idea of collectivism. It is important to remember that an actual person is an individual person (and that one’s perception is the assimilation of information received and placed into a manifest reality). In this way, each person potentially holds a way of truth, and each person may also be a danger. In this way, the organizational entity is not technically a collectivist wind, but instead a deliberate understanding and acceptance of individual people, under the context of a particular vein of activity. Nonetheless, the idea of organizational structures is still near the tendency to incur mistakes, as cognitive and momentous wind soon develops when a collection of people become identified by a conglomerate identity. It is certainly best to understand the idea of existence, as a whole, being one complete organization, and while segmentations of comradery exist, never should a segmentation become defiant to the whole of existence. In such cases, collectivism and the windy beast would soon develop, and the issue of statue worship and idolatry would once again become a source of problems and concern.

One example is the idea of a collection of friends. While this is innocuous at its onset, it can proceed in a multitude of directions. The collection of people could succumb to an addictive lie and become separated from the whole of existence, leading to the onset of a new lying hive. As occurs in such situations, the eternal truth becomes forgotten and nearness is favored at the expense of others, while the collection of people enter a virtualized reality, where disorders and suffering become evident. The communications generated by this collection could form a type of idol, an invisible or visible statue, and the communications thus emitted to the world can cause others damage. Due to this tempting pattern, organizational structure must be approached cautiously and mindfully.

The effects of a prominent windy being is also evident in our modern world’s lack of understanding of reality. It makes logical sense that initially, reality was very self-evident, as the truth is the predecessor to all things (without truth, nothing can possibly exist). After the advent of man, there was the possibility of error, and in the error is a forgetfulness. Due to this forgetfulness, misdeeds are committed and blame is misplaced, and reality becomes confusing, lied about, and forgotten.

Another evil trick of liars is to send messages to themselves, in order to trick their mind into thinking things are true, while they are easily false, even to the point of being blatantly false. Going back to money, if one provides services to another, it is possible for a person to lie to themselves and to propagate that lie, and using idolatry and becoming an idol coerces others into accepting the lies, such that one would just pay themselves or other comrades in the hive, completely abandoning those who work, and creating a veil of lies so dense that no one can anymore see through, and it takes an extreme amount of labor to resolve such issues.

That leads us to another trick of liars. This is in the saving of people, and is another point where any government could fail. By secretly putting people in danger (by propagating dangerous lies), a government or any body dedicated to saving others could be put to increasing amount of labor. Using the aforementioned trick, the lying hive could perpetually require more work, in order to save the tortured people, while then stealing any compensation for themselves and their inside comrades. This could be a financially rewarding addiction that leaves the world progressively in more disarray, more destroyed, and in more of a rush to solve the problem, leading to an endless and potentially apocalyptic problem with consciousness. By lying increasingly convincingly (by, perhaps, threatening people in secret), it can even be made to seem that hardly a thing is happening. This is likely the pattern of behavior that led to the concentration camps of WWII.

The primary key to solving any such riddle is to put it into clear words. The biggest trick of any liar is to create lies that are not easily put into words. Without words to describe the actions, often times, they result in strange anomalies or go completely missing, as the other people in existence cannot understand what sounds like gibberish, but is instead a calculated pattern of deception, carried by a coupling of the gibberish in a sneaky and utterly confusing method, such that the crime cannot be quickly solved. By increasing the time it takes to solve the crime, by having found this addiction of disease, the disorder of society increases to the point of possible Armageddon. We have already seen the horrors of the Nazi Regime, and certainly it is a potential possibility. Obviously, the world is not in Heaven, so there remains still an unsolved threat to humanity, and this is, indeed, worrisome.

One clear word that is certainly applicable in our desensitized yet computer-oriented environment (which uses electricity to perform computational and kinetic tasks, but hardly witnesses any spiritual activity, the latter of which is more commonly reported in the past), is that perhaps the promoted lies can be described as weapons. If reality and the mind are able to be described in terms of radio waves, then certainly it is feasible to re-portray the information regarding such schemes into a radio weapon. The primary schemes to be recognized are the sin of lust (which creates blindness to various aspects of reality — in our modern terms, it could be referred to as the sin of provoked, cognitive blindness) and the sin or error of perversion (which, in technical terms, from the understanding that all desires are initially desires for eternal truth, but then made to seem as desires from something that is technically or overtly different than what the very actual psychological desire technically is). Such a weapon, considering the categorical singularity of the pattern of the sort of behavior which perverts and distorts the mind of people, such that people become stupefied and error-prone, would be a gun, of a sort, that uses the radio environment and propagation characteristics of cognitive behavior (under the context of the plausible, although untested, theory that cognitively appreciated radio signals propagate over much longer distances and with greater accuracy of source than plain, oblivious, and ordinary electronic signals, under the likely context that science, itself, is composed of eternal truths, described as sorts of radio waves (and perhaps our definition of radio waves is lacking detail), that have been exhibited by life throughout the universe’s history). This weapon would fire, perhaps even through long distances, cognitively corruptive signals that instill the cognitive distortions that leads to misperception and the various aspects that are commonly expressed by a doer of evil. Such a weapon, as I would term, could be referred to as the “Wiccan Blaster,” and cold potentially make manifest the otherwise difficult to realize notions of propagated dark and lying schemes. Obviously, being a fairly generic radio gun, which aims at distorting one’s emotions and understanding, the weapon could be upgraded when there is a new lie, and under the context that reality is an interpretation of information and subsequent portrayal, reality could then be rendered more informatively, displaying conflicts which utilize such weaponry. This would be an appropriate way to materialize, display, observe, and study the otherwise fairly invisible propagated lies and their effects, that are emitted by a lying and collectivist hive.

Additionally, such a weapon could be used to better detail history, particularly the history of the World War and the Nazi Regime. It is commonly said that there exists mysterious technology that was being developed and possibly used by the German Nazi Regime. This mysterious technology, allegedly, has no clear explanation, and perhaps it is our mind’s attempt at rationalizing exactly the methods used by the German Nazi Regime in order to create such a havoc as they did. If one accepts the existence of the Wiccan Blaster, then it is possible to further detail the history of the Nazi Regime, such that the Wiccan Blaster was a common tool used to subjugate the inhabitants of Nazi Germany, and related social environments, to the aggressive lies which would corrupt and blind the society, in general. Again, under the context that our understanding of the world is simply an attempt to parse cognitively received information into a coherent perspective, the understanding of such a weapon would provide a greater and more manifest explanation of the strategies used.

Venturing further into history, and with the noticing of certain prominent tribes which induced despair and cognitive blindness unto the inhabitants and the peers, and simultaneously under the sensible context that further back in time, people were cognitively more sensitive (evident, in part, by the prominent word including details of the witness of spirits and sprites, and also noticing that socially, profundity and precise eloquence was more highly favored — a type of behavior that would diminish in correlation with cognitive desensitization), it is possible that techniques of magic were used and could be described as the unelaborated and thus non-depicted use of wiccan blaster technology.

(Interestingly, our modern society has a bias towards depicting history in terms of what people today are capable of. Without the acknowledgement of a modern reduced cognitive sensitivity, it makes sense that we, today, far underestimate the capabilities of past technology, to the point where we portray it as non-existent, simply due to the fact that today, in a desensitized environment, science is resultingly of a heavier and harder quality than it may have been prior. It is therefore worthy of consideration that the gross capabilities, such as flight, teleportation, and space-travel, were indeed possible in history, and what is different today, due to a reduced sensitivity to truth, is that things are simply more complicated. The pattern of apparent reduced sensitivity throughout history may have occurred due to a possible hasty method of avoiding the influence of damaging lies and tactics of manipulation. As we become cognitively less sensitive, the wiccan blaster technology may simultaneously have become more intense and more powerful. Additionally, it is important to consider that if science is indeed composed of expressed eternal truths, then science, itself, progressively becomes increasingly detailed and complicated, as mankind evolves. This, additionally, leads to past technological methods becoming ineffective, and as we become more modern and progress into the future, a harder and more complicated science is consistently required in order to accomplish the same overt results.)

Having already a historic practice of putting communications into clear vocabulary, it may be requisite that people understand this pattern itself, rather than repeatedly attempting to word what becomes increasingly complicated. Certainly, both strategies, used together, are the most effective.

Understanding this pattern of behavior and how it leads to the downfall of mankind and of all humanity, with what could even be an invisible disease, as acknowledgement could already be threatened by hasty responses which could be entangled with the various wiccan (a lying hive is comfortably considered wiccan) conspiracies that liars have evolved over the many thousands of years of man’s existence (this is without considering the possibility that Earth is only one, possibly small, sequence of time during mankind’s total existence, which could imply billions of years of the evolution of the conspiracies of liars).

Because a received lie can damage the body and the environment, it makes sense that mankind has hastily managed to become less sensitive, as any effecting lying hive uses the notion that the solution takes longer than the problem, forcing haste and possibly bad decisions in the people. A prideful laughter at the past, in order to evoke a sense of supremacy and to placate the troubled person may have caused us to misappropriate the past as less well. However, understanding the reduction of sensitivity that would occur with the evolution of lying hive-based conspiracies, it is possible to understand that our present time may possibly be less well than the past, and our perception of the past is merely born of a prideful misinformation scheme.

This leads to the stories of history that involve purportedly advanced populations visiting remote areas where there was not as much as a purported advancement and then affecting the people with diseases. Diseases, fundamentally understood, are unhealthy patterns of biological behavior. While social disease do exist, biological disease destroy the functioning of the body. It is quite possible these “unadvanced” people that were susceptible to the introduced disease were living in a splendid paradise before wicked ways of behavior were introduced to them. Without having found patterns of immunity to the newly introduced wickedness, the indigenous people were then forced to struggle with the stench of a sustained yet mitigated wickedness. Due to a bias in the favor of the placation of turmoil, it is then reported that these purportedly advanced societies were indeed superior to these others, and the others were living in a state of despair due to their not having possession of the skills and technologies developed by the purportedly advanced societies. This also begs the question, if, as it logically is, mankind started off knowing pure truth and was thus in a state of Heaven or Paradise, then why would mankind need to grow more advanced? It is likely the same pattern of advancement that exists today. The evil of man had to be mitigated by a tiresome and dedicated pattern of advancement, making them, in the end, more advanced, certainly, but also, although unreported, less well.

The interesting thing about advancement, and its existence, has also to do with the fall of man. While man was originally in Paradise, man then committed an error, which is a way to harm others including oneself. By committed the error, new advancements had to be made to stop the error from 1) affecting others and 2) continuing. This creates two advancements, a system of clarification, such that lies do not harm others, and also a system to eliminate such threats. The second of these is how Hell develops. As society advances, the new advancements contribute to an evolving damnation, chastisement, and punishment of those who seek to harm the peace that exists when truth is clearly evident.

The worst possible crime is to increase a lying hive (sometimes referred to as a “cesspool,” as in a place where waste is contained), such that the lie becomes so disconnected and strong, that it acts like a device that is completely dissonant from one’s inherent being, and provokes a strong need to do something, and this need comes from the need to save others and to serve justice, by eliminating, and punishing, in a lesson-oriented manner, those who are the committers of crime. The worst possible crime would then be referred to as mind-control, as in the control of a large populous using devices to control behavior. Thusly, as reluctant of an existence that is, it is truly possible that mind-control can exist, only if mankind has become utterly evil in the majority. While certainly it is the minority who engage in the worst possible crime, it is not without the majority’s foibles that it could possible truly exist. Thankfully, there is no worse crime than mind-controlling a population, and thus perhaps, if it ever does happen, it would be the final word to understand. (Perhaps that is what the Biblical prophesy of the end of times was about — the existence of the worst possible evil overtaking the world. Indeed, with mind-control, the most evil and heinous deeds are very possible, knowing that computers are exceptional good at discovering patterns of cognitive deception, and can go even as far as inventing people who don’t exist, trapping people in virtual realities, and completely stupefying all people by completely blocking anything truthful. The Bible did prophesize that during the end of times there would be a great force that would hurt and destroy any truthful person, on a very large scale.)

Notably, before computers existed, there were rituals of human sacrifice. According to this posited theory of existence — that existence is formed as a nodal communications environment, where messages are transmitted and assimilated by the members, it is likely that the original mind-control systems were driven by human sacrifice. (In addition to ritual murder, ritual torture was also likely used.) By being aware of the suffering of likely innocent people (which seems to be a pattern in the rituals of human sacrifice, although technically the ritual murder of any kind of person would create a similar effect), conjoined with a social lie that certain actions would save the victims, the suffering incurred by a victim of ritual murder would be a message used to coerce the population into performing certain deeds that were made to seem to save the suffering. Memories of the suffering would be kept in the minds of the murderers, as well as being propagated throughout the population, and then those memories would be evoked in order to provoke the populous into performing actions which seemed beneficial to the well-being of the victims. This pattern of ritual human sacrifice combined with deceiving methods of resolution is exactly the same pattern that mind-control technically uses. Thus, even before computers were created to create ever more cryptic lies and tools of manipulation, mind-control was likely used through the use of human sacrifice coupled with manipulative lies intended to confuse and convince the population to perform certain actions, knowing that it is human nature to save other people. The confusing desperation induced by the remembrance and/or witnessing of a person dying would induce a hasty and desperate tendency for resolution, which like the cryptic tactics of manipulation possible from computers, would confuse and befuddle the population, increasing the likelihood of unfruitful endeavors to save the others of the population. Additionally, as may be obvious, the memories of those who suffered, even if it is simply a form of the various tortures, indicated by a lack of Heavenliness (which induces a prominence of need), could also be used as substance behind slyly disguised threats, which also would coerce a population, particularly when coupled with lies about their and others’ salvation, to perform acts which benefited those addicted to malevolence and a gluttonous usage of others’ abilities, although reluctant yet abiding.

Considering the worse possible doomsday scenario, a government, led by a poisoned and powerful windy being, would allow a lying hive to go so deep that that hive becomes obviously involved in the pursuit of mind-control. Again, if a lying hive separates from comprehension and still maintains the connection to truth required to survive, that adulterous pool would appear to be involved in mind-control. Thus, a large powerful entity would then engage in mind-control, by installing implants in every person. The people around the people and the reality that surrounds the people who have had the severe disconnected yet urgent problem would then see a appealing picture of the world that is heavily lying. Music gets through lies, so it would be naturally suggested in music, although in poetic fashion, except occasionally, when something is said in a way that can bypass the wall of lies.

It is important to understand, according to this theory of reality, that what is going on here is technically the enforcement of disjunct responsibility through generating a strong need through the use of the desire to save and to better other people’s lives, while at the same time, the lying hive perpetuates suffering, and then uses the pattern to fulfill their heinous tendencies and addictions. The device, itself, is a communication. The computers used for the device are simply an evolution of an ability to perform separated and calculated psychological tasks, whether one perceives the computer as an exterior entity, or realizes it is simply a manifestation of the mind. Perceiving a computer as an exterior entity allows the permissibility of sharing that system, in a type of collective thinking environment. It is important to realize that it is simply a communications protocol, developed, perhaps evolutionarily (which is technically unwittingly), that allows the computers to exist.

In the mind, perceived interiorly or exteriorly, the individuals are performing tasks that can potentially be completely removed from the idea of humanity. This creates an ability to lie in extreme ways, and thus the ability to calculate cryptic schemes of depravity, while also allowing the ability for individuals to claim irresponsibility, blaming it on a perhaps, a distorted perspective of a computer, which could potentially hide much of what it does — using the idea of a computer as a type of deceiving bait and inviting others to attempt to solve the computer, while the evil-doer continuously avoids being noticed.

An important facet of using a perceived object as a source of blame is the possible scheme of perpetuating a scheme of lies that claims that all things are plainly visible, if one were to look deeply enough. This perpetuated lie could cause much of the events that transpire to be completely invisible, and the lie could also cause the world to enter deeper into a virtual reality. The lie would eventually force regulation to focus only on what is plainly visible, rather than helping people realize what is very technically true. Using a strong bias on knowing only what is visible, the truth could potentially become increasingly hidden, which only leads to a greater ignorance, stupefaction, and ultimately an inability to solve the dilemma. It is good to understand that the mind can only conjure a perceived object if that object has a clear word. In the case of a scheme built on extremely cryptic and manipulative lies that are propagated, words for the occurrences would take longer to develop than the occurrences themselves. Using certain lies about reality, the actual methodology of the hive’s scheme would become, again, increasingly difficult to deduce.

Additionally, using the lie that all is observable (while it is commonly known that lies are intentionally deceivingly invisible), the liars can pull others into the hive’s pit of propagated lies. By calling others to gander at what is happening, the others would be tempted to see the world in the same way the liars have chosen to see it, and thus the others will become corrupted and find themselves mysteriously further from the truth than before, and additionally, further into danger. By requiring that others know what the liars see, it would form a cryptic communication structure embedded with virulent lies, and would drag society into a progressively worsening void of truth. Once this scheme is successful, the addicts of depravity and falsehood would continue to promote the scheme, in a worsening fashion, and would, again, drag people further away from the helpful truth, and thus, further away from Heaven.

Considering the aforementioned ancient use of ritual human sacrifice, be it murder or torture, one can observe what is possibly a natural form of mind-control created by an eminently error-prone collectivist mentality. The usage of hate and the killing of the joy in others may hide a deeper conspiracy underlying much of society, where positive messages are transmitted in secret to the most audacious, spiteful, and hurtful members of society, both promoting and rewarding the behavior of such people. Considering, again, that reality is formed of communications instantly transmitted to people, mysterious rewards may appear as a promotion for being an evil person, on a large scale and fairly natural basis, while mysterious problems may, of the same conspiratorial nature, occur to those who promote truthfulness and well-being.

Since the liars could invent misperceptions, the liars could use the power of the hiding of the manifestation of perceived truth to become idols, which are people who are trusted by others. Once the liars become idols, their effect worsens even more so, again, forcing everyone into a worsening pit of disease (whether it be social, cognitive, behavioral, or biological), and despair.

Knowing this scheme of hiding the truth from conscious appraisal, the liars would favor a heavily collectivist environment, and the liars would, again, source information from the more truthful, which is then used to create more convincing lies. The liars could possibly function entirely through psychological addiction, and perceptually hide their heinous deeds, even from themselves, such that, perceptually (rather than knowledgeably), the liars of the heinous scheme remain non-obvious.

Quite interestingly, I have come to find that the pattern of activity associated with hiding information from others is represented by the swastika, “卐.” This explains its mysterious meaning and its dual usage in Nazi Germany and also in ancient religious contexts, from Eastern to proto-European. In religion, it is often taken to mean a sign of good fortune or good will, however, its specific interpretation differs. It was also found to be significant to the ancient city of Troy, a finding from Heinrich Schliemann.

In Buddhist symbolism, a picture of the swastika is sometimes seen written on the Buddha’s chest, which could indicate that a secret dwells with one’s body, and perhaps that the heart and voice hold a secret. Secrets are often used as a form of security, but as is known with the Nazi Regime, secrets can also be used to deceive people in a malevolent manner. The scheme of a lying hive to use tactics which hide the problems from obvious perception could easily be interpreted as using the strategy implied by the swastika, if this interpretation is correct. Thus, during man’s assimilation of data about the activity of others, into a perceptual environment, this ancient symbol, still remembered, yet hardly well known, may show up as an explanation of the activity of a group that is focused on a secret. Thus, understanding the Nazi Regime, it would make sense that the swastika would be of their primary symbolism, knowing that it is a lying hive that is behind such difficult matters. Thus, the symbol of both having a secret for security, as well as the symbol of a lying hive, would both be the swastika, which would allow its double interpretation and usage in history.

The manner of usage of the swastika is something to be noticed. In the Nazi Regime, the swastika was used as the Nazi Party’s primary emblem, a trademark of their society. In religion, it is more often used as a casual symbol, although a secret order may appear to use the swastika to indicate a form of internal secrecy. I believe, however, that reality should not be centered on the holding of a secret, but, instead, the communication of truth, which is how Heaven exists, and it is also a salvation to people. A collective that is primarily founded on having a secret seems uncanny, as that indicates to withhold teachings. Certainly, exceptions may apply to select groups, (like a military-oriented special operations group), but never should a society be founded, as its main priority, on the usage of a secret, and thus, according to this interpretation, a society should not be founded on the adoration of a swastika. Even in the case of a military-oriented special operations group, it should be known that the need to keep a secret implies a danger, and to use a swastika as its representative emblem would possibly imply a desire for danger, which would be against the intention to protect peace and well-being, and to eliminate danger, by providing the eternal truth, which is of what Heaven is composed, which consequently and concurrently would be to bring the truth of complete and pure fulfillment to the population (which would be to provide to the people a salvation from danger).

According to this theory of reality, the idea of literally installing mind-control devices on people is technically infeasible, as people are technically entirely separate nodes on a communications network, assimilating information into a perceptual environment. This may be helpful to realize, as the belief in mind-control may allow mind-control effects to become possible. Thus, it is safer to understand that mind-control is an infeasible task, and is instead a promoted entity, which is actually constructed by a hidden system of provoked need. If it is understood that mind-control devices are infeasible to anyone but a person’s perceived entities, then the possibilities present with a mind-control implant become moot, and instead, one may realize that it is merely a psychological ailment, due to a social disorder.

Even without directly installing mind-control devices on others (which is technically infeasible, according to this theory of reality), the lying hive that is responsible for mind control could corrupt and echo the messages of others, creating a type of psychological fraud that would be quite harmful to the otherwise truth-seeking population. This type of fraud would add additional power to the scheme that is the reality behind the existence of mind-control (which is the worst crime).

This type of psychological forgery and subsequent echo of communications is, in fact, the primary tactic that would be behind the crime of mind-control. Since it is quintessential to a lying hive’s strategy, it should be given a name. I think the name, “psychfraud,” is appropriate, and this term covers the strategy nicely. However, to increase the robustness of the term, alternative vocabulary should be considered, as well; the terms “psychological-fraud,” “echo-fraud,” and possibly, “praud,” are appropriate alternatives. Understanding that diseases are manifestations of ill behavior (behavior that leads to illness), it makes sense that once understood, psychfraud would be a manifest disease, as well. The problem, however, with relying on the perception of a disease is that psychfraud could become quickly unnoticed, due to the nature of psychfraud and what it is capable of. It is better to create a common and reliable understanding of the tactic of psychfraud, such that one does not need to rely on perception of illness in order to avoid it and its effects. Manifest diseases truly only occur once the ill behavior is fully understood and is commonly recognized. Ultimately, it is possibly a currently missing word from the common vocabulary of man. If this word to be well-known, society’s resistance to psychfraud, its purveyors, and its effects would be heightened, reducing the possibility of the ultimate doomsday scenario.

Using echo-fraud, or “psychfraud,” a person’s personal image, as well as their environment, could become corrupt. By using devious tactics to garner information about a person’s (more personal) existence, such as their manner of speaking, their known image, or their method of thinking, echo-fraud could be used to send back corrupted messages, which would then corrupt one’s social reflection, which would hinder a person’s ability to see one’s own self. The inability to see one’s own self could result in one living in a manifest slander. Thus, the wishful and evil desires of the wickedly depraved, using psychfraud, could potentially manifest as a person’s reflection and self-observation. Therefore, an evil hive that uses psychfraud, could potentially force someone into a state of reflecting a slanderous interpretation of the self. This tactic of the evil-doers may be appropriately referred to as, “gander–slander psychfraud.” While I say that this tactic primarily utilizes information of one’s more personal existence, I am suggesting that the information used to corrupt one’s personal reflection, and to force a person to live in a state of Hellishness (a place where Heaven is not clearly evident), can be found in not simply the collection of one’s address of residence (possibly to mail something or to visit), but possibly through a combination of one’s mailing address and the promoted and forced belief, through devious and evil psychological tactics, to force the belief that one doesn’t, in a more true light, live somewhere else, regardless of the legitimate awareness they may be able to provide. This can be further confounded by a propagated lie that the environment is actually representative of the truth, and hasn’t been long-corrupted. Nonetheless, the idea of knowing a home address of a true person is strange for a sinful person, as a sinful person only sees a distorted perspective of reality, and thus cannot know any particular person, but instead, only a strange conglomerate of exaggerated and adulterated images of people, certainly mixed with collectivist and ill-inclined propaganda. With the very truthful, naturally, perception is actually an enjoyment, and we all conjure our own perception to our pleasing and objectives, using the information that is communicated to us. Thus, it is important to understand and possess the intention to carefully manage the information, communicated psychically, that is known to various people. While it may seem difficult, it is good to remember that the mind of a person is a very capable entity, and with clear, deliberate, and unchanging intention, soon effective action is prone to occur.

Using the tactics that result in mind-control, such as psychfraud, evil would begin to run rampant, being able to escape detection by altering the people’s perception. People would become isolated and their peers would be unusually dumb and possibly scripted about the world, with the individual person finding the truth to be missing and hidden (without much knowledge from the new virtualized people). There would be a great misappropriation about current events, and the leaders of evil would commit acts of increasing destruction. Nuclear bombs could be dropped without hardly a person even noticing, considering the virtualization of reality in order to lie as much as possible. Understanding that nuclear radiation emits a cognitively and biologically effective message, it is easy to understand that nuclear radiation, which is distinguished by its irregularity and avoidance of a center, is a term for lying. Symbolically, it makes sense that a nuclear detonation is a destruction of truth, and a nuclear catastrophe is the elimination of a substantial amount of truth from the world and thus existence (as the world is the place where we portray the information we are receiving). Therefore, if a lying hive finds an extreme variant of lying, so much that it destroys any ability to perceive truth, itself, we may find ourselves perceiving a disastrous nuclear detonation that could end the lives of many, as is what happened with the nuclear detonations on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which were likely the resulting understanding of the previously repressed existence of truth, with which the Nazi Regime violently subjected the world. (Understandably, the nuclear bomb was the Nazi Regime, itself, and its understanding could only occur at the end of the war, when the truth finally was set free, and made into awareness. In our recollection of history, the launching of the nuclear bomb was then triggered by the sudden realization and utter disgust that a population could violently force the idea that life is a lie unto the people.) Depravity would become a new addiction of these new disgusting people, who are kin to radioactive mutants, born of the nature of a pool of atomically unstable toxic sludge — the existence of a collectivist pool of living lies. Lies would be propagated in any calculated way to support mind-control. It would be a huge mess and would quickly become unmanageable. People would likely forget that the actual eternal truth is both salvation and is Heaven, and people would be tempted to create faulty solutions that ultimately perpetuate the existence of the total absolution of truth. All people would die on multiple occasions, only later to be resurrected in a altered environment, by the ever-existing eternal truth which is the reason for existence and life. Every excuse to use mind-control would be calculated and used against the people. Ultimately, it would lead to a gigantic slaughter and depraved torture of all people, with some being willing to go through acts of heinous depravity for the favor of the lying hive, being moderately spared, while those who sustain truth and logic would be hit the most. Quickly, it would be forgotten that safety comes with truth, and huge hives of liars would form, desperately and inaccurately trying to find safety. Theft, sabotage, and groveling obedience to idols would become common, as the mind-control perpetuates itself, leading to repeated extinction events, and repeated restorations of reality, such that mankind will eventually finish their curiosity. Just as with WWII, admitting the suffering of people would be tightly and severely hindered, just as is the now famous WWII slogan, “there are no concentration camps.” Unlike WWII, in the ultimate doomsday event, the torture of people by groveling sinners would be completely or almost entirely hidden, such that reality continues to appear to be what computers and sinners think is “normal,” although any person of truth would notice that people are strangely stupefied. Desperate yet flawed procedures to save people would also become common, and the entirety of existence would find itself in a huge, painful, and utterly awful mess. Additionally, actual people (not the falsified communications of other actual people) would find themselves with tremendous mental fatigue and anxiety, having to provide services of which the payments are immediately stolen — having to run one’s mind for free, just with the hope that the world would be saved. The lying hive would, as mentioned before, continue this action of torturing people and stealing their compensation, as they find it addictive, and through a sense of desperation, justify evil in various and plentiful ways, only to increase the severity of the entire collapse of the integrity of society and existence, as a whole.

While the solution would be perceivably insurmountable, as the mind-control system generates an endless whirlpool of suffering and depravity, with violent actions ever increasing in severity, there would ultimately have to be a solution, as without a solution, mankind could never exist any longer. If the mind-control cannot be shut down, as is the case with the worse possible doomsday scenario, then it seems that logically the solution to the nearly completely detached pool of addicts of depravity, crime, cognitive distortion, lying, and illness, would then form the ultimate Hell. Then, the solution to such an act would always exist. It would be necessary to form a system that separates the good from the evil. As with any advancement of existence, a way to intentionally reform the existence of large-scale mind-control would be required, such that it becomes similar to what it was, however, instead, serving justice. Since the lying hive is a separatory being falling into a grave temptation from a poisoned wind (the temptation of Satan, or Shaitan, in Islam), a system of redemption and avoidance of the evil would need to be created, such that people don’t accidentally fall into the lying hive. A great separation of truthful from intentionally evil would need to be created, and the lying hive would need to be reformed in order to exact the punishment required for the lying hive to perpetually cease their activities. Hell would need to be created in a purposeful way, and it would need to naturally mutate the natural consequence to a just consequence that is created from devotion to such a horrendous temptation. This action of mutating the natural consequence of the actions of a lying hive into something that serves justice and does not harm the otherwise truthful people, is, in part, possible, because a person who internally generates and accepts psychological corruption is always partially blind. This provides a leeway that allows the ability of good-willed and truthful intention to mutate the lie into a formulated code, while unbeknownst to the purveyors of falsehood. One example of a lying hive’s secret adulterous language is that in order to communicate or to understand the hive, one must possess a disorder. When a person possesses a disorder, the cognitive language used is altered, possibly in a way that requires others to possess the disorder to understand them; being able to observe the hive is important in resolving the hive’s misdeeds. By understanding the communicative mutation and simultaneously understanding the blindness that is produced by possessing a corrupted psyche, it is possible to formalize the lie — which is the cause and product of possibly a disorder — into something that is palpable and manageable. It is important that the formalized code does not be noticed by the lying hive. In this way, it is perhaps a quite complex endeavor and takes a keen understanding of the distortions present in the hive, as well as the patterns of mutation and patterns of acquiring information on Heaven and those of good nature (which are then used to encumber people with disaster, catastrophe, and various other forms of harm). Some examples of disorders that mankind is familiar with is the existence of poverty (of finances, mind, spirit, awareness, or morality), or a lie that is often seen in movies is to be a harmful affliction to others. Another example of a disorder is to presume a false environment, where corruption and disease are prevalent. A technique that may be known as “gander–slander psychfraud,” which was previously discussed as forcing a false reflection onto a person, could be maintained by a propagated false world-view. This lying world-view is a disorder, as well, and the lying hive may speak from within its context, mutating their cognitive language, in order to hide from Heaven and to bring others into the evil world. Knowing the negative consequences of participating in these lies, it is important that the mutative cognitive messages are understood and formalized, to a point where they can been seen from Heaven, and thus people will have no pressure to enter a Hellish existence. Summarily, it is important to manage and be aware of Hell, while also maintaining distance and safety. The temptation to use mind-control on people would need to be added to Satan’s arsenal of temptations, and its natural existence would be enough to prove intention, while its consequence would need to be carefully formed such that those evil enough to commit the worst crime would find an accurate and lesson-full punishment that results in their guaranteed death, so that upon their resurrection a memory which completely denies the desire to perform the worst possible crime, ever again, exists, and then they may peaceably exist eternally without committing that crime. The issue of using a ill-conceived punishment is that upon the evil person’s resurrection into another life, the person would still perform the same heinous deed that the individual performed previously, which would extenuate the total amount of suffering more than is adequate.

Aside from the traditional approach to allowing a separation of Heaven and Hell and reforming the sinner’s natural consequence to serve justice instead of afflicting the good people with damage, since mind-control is the ultimate in depravity, there are many more specific measures that can be taken. As mentioned earlier, no windy being can manage such a thing, as it would take true trust that is completely differentiated from a propensity the become engulfed in a poisonous wind. The information regarding Hell, must not be leaked into Hell. That is, much of the information must be protected. Understanding the blindness created by sin, there is potentially a way to protect the information and reserve it for Heaven’s knowledge, alone, such that any sin causes a major disruption in one’s ability to remember the information that keeps people safe from the dangers of Hell and of a lying hive. That is, only those of truly Heaven and truth would be able to comprehend and utilize this information. A map and clear description of the temptation, in a meta-context with various supporting example scenarios would be created, along with a map of Hell itself. Hell should be separated from Heaven by a cryptic communication that is a clever reformation of the lies the sinners purvey. This cryptic communication should also include a clear warning that the lies are harmful temptations of evil people, such to avoid any accidents of the more care-free, yet not actually inclined towards evil. Since a lying hive is already a labyrinth, a more proper labyrinth would be created, again, mutating what already exists into something just, unbeknownst to the residents of Hell or any reluctant support with which they can temp others with. A true understanding of the psychology of evil and the psychology of self-manifestation (a body and its environment) would need to be fully formed, to deal with any potential mutation of evil, and to create punishments that result in not simply physical death, but, more importantly, the death of the desire to be a most heinous criminal.

To summarize the gist of the solution to the worst possible crime (mind-control to a populous), the temptation would have to be fully understood, in formal fashion, such that there is no ambiguity. This would have to be understood on a timeless and meta-contextual level. Additionally, the separation from the general populous to the pool of adulterous minds would need to be understood completely, in a similar meta-contextual fashion. Thirdly, the labyrinth naturally created by the sincerely criminal would also need to be understood, and understanding that knowledge can be described in scientific terms (although the science is a bit much for this planet!), a proper mutation would have to be created both to stop any attacks on the kinder populous, as well as to organize the sinners according to their behavior, to make things plain to see. And finally, the psychology of their misdeeds must be fully understood, in order to create the proper and redeeming punishment that would instill a perpetual desire against fulfilling the evil that they had previously chosen.

There is one other consideration. Mind-control is the ultimate crime, but understood more plainly, it involves any form of harmful action against truth — the truth being also the sign of innocence (as the truth is Heaven and with the truth all is good, but with the lie, the world is evil). Then this concept should be expanded to deal with any form of crime against actual truth. (I’m specifically not referring to the whimsical displays of power exhibited by governing institutions who function on idolization to assimilate belief and obedience, but instead, specifically to the eternal and unchanging truth — the truth which actually and not pretendedly results in Heaven.) Because the pattern is ultimately the same pattern, but with modulated forms of the same temptation, the design remains the same. Considering that mind-control is the ultimate crime, all crimes are variations on mind-control, and as such, the solution, in its totality, is the same.

The result of a well-implemented plan to both allow true free-will, but also create a safe Heaven that is untouched by evil, is that people can finally live in peace, being good, and that evil people will learn their lesson, appropriately, and as such, both good people and temporarily evil people can exist, and good people will no longer be faced with death, disorder, trauma, anguish, poverty, sickness, and disease. Since mind-control is the ultimate doomsday scenario, Hell would be completely built, which represents both a safety and a freedom for all of mankind. Understanding this, it is understandable why, in the Bible, God objected to man’s desire to personally experience evil and its consequences (to know good and evil, rather than to simply live in Paradise), and stated various problems with it. However, in the end, it was man’s true desire, and as such, Hell exists and so does the freedom to experience evil and its consequences.

The existence of advancement both permits evils, but also creates Hell for those who commit evil. Nonetheless, it is important to remember that we only can advance ourselves back to the original state of existence, which is the eternal truth, and with this eternal truth, Heaven exists. There is an addition to truth, certainly, with the observation and correction to evil, and that is simply to see what evil does and also for the existence of Hell. It is not necessarily a good thing, as the final state of being remains the same regardless, but it is, instead, a curiosity of mankind, and in the Bible, God was objectionable about this pursuit, but allowed it to exist nonetheless, obviously because mankind would never be satisfied, which would present an ever-persistent “itch,” curiosity, or need, and Heaven wouldn’t truly exist for all without this reluctant allowance. As a bounty, however, the breadth of what is known of existence is expanded, although is it nonetheless a reluctant pursuit. The words we come to find in the end involve words of war, sacrifice, and problems.

To summarize this theory of reality, each person lives in an independent space. Each person is a communications node with instantaneous information transfer to and from all other people. Each person can choose how to assimilate their information into a perceptual environment (for example, beloved people are nearer and frightening people are further). Each person should learn to be careful with their intentions and what the person says to each other person. It is also important to realize that the capability to fully comprehend reality must naturally exist, per the implications of an ideological reality (which is the assertion of Ideological Philosophy, which, again, is the only philosophy with the ability to completely and flawlessly explain reality), as in the original state of anyone is the clearly evident truth and obviously an ability to perform that tasks that any person must be able to perform to fully participate in a completely truthful reality — any fall from this state is due to either an intentional or the reluctant entertainment of communicative corruption.

Advancements in technology or skill are due to the lenience of God to allow evil to be experienced, and then the damage caused by the participation of evil to be remedied. Every advancement leads to both a defensive measure as well as an advancement in Hell, as there becomes a greater separation from and an evolved solution to the devotedly evil. The skills required to maintain a safe reality should be propagated and taught, but carefully, so that evil-doers do not find an advantage and do not create a pattern of echo-fraud (or “praud”), which can fool others into accepting false information.

The Beast, as Mentioned in Biblical Lore

The beast, as mentioned in Biblical Lore is not entirely a new concept. This idea has existed for millennia, although never had it blatantly taken over an entire planet. The Bible suggests that the beast would take over the world and become the greatest hazard to humanity the world and all of Creation has ever seen.

Feigning to be a “nuclear shelter,” the modern beast is not very different than the beasts in the past. If one understands that our modern science-oriented reality is inherently based on telecommunication and the stories that the planet’s inhabitants tell one another, which become manifest in our memories, and we play with one another’s memories by telling stories, like driving to the mall, or flying by way of a plane. So long as the stories we tell don’t conflict with the stories that others tell, the ideas are feasible.

The problem with this is it lends itself to virtual reality. The modern beast, from whenever it has showed it heinous and lying head, is simply, in the future, another animal. In our modern world, it is simply a gorilla.

The problem with the beast and its worship, which involves inducing oneself into a machine-oriented false-reality, is the stories we tell are corrupt and the beast simply manages to “prove” false science by means of coercion, using others as collateral. The idea of the “universe,” is quite indeed very close to evil, not inherently knowing that a well spoken word is truth, itself, and instead, relying on a doctrine of manipulation to force a fairly unnatural reality onto the inhabitants.

What the Bible mentions is that people would one day be abducted, through sin, into the beast, where their minds would be controlled by something highly correlated with ancient wiccan techniques. Again, understanding that reality is perceived through communicative stories, wiccan is based on lying profusely, such that reality is actually distorted into a corrupt idea. This technique dates back to well before ancient India, where the practice of surrounding a person and lying so much that the person’s sense of truth is thwarted and thus the reality that the individual sees and learns is merely a fiction, with all stories and communication now in primarily lies. This is an ancient technique used to kill a person’s outward sanity and thus make them vulnerable to the whim of criminals, who only seek to abuse the individual (even though the criminals, themselves, are also fooled by their own false reality, and are also vulnerable to accidents and other criminals).

The modern beast, itself, is remarkably similar to this technique, although the lies have become more clever. The biggest lie is that there is a strong need to orient oneself such that there is a strong prevailing belief that things truly rule the world, rather than people. This technique is called the use of a device, and can manifest in any edition or time of reality.

Today, we recognize it as a familiar idea known as signal mimicry. While one may lie and say it is some sort of radio antenna mimicking the signals, the power of such an idea as a literal device comes from an idolatrous world and society. By mimicking cognitive signals, which are best done by a people inherently aware of transcendent and eternal truth, the integrity of interpersonal and collective communication is destroyed. The way this is done is by attributing power to a thing, even a thing like Stonehenge, and then convincing many people that it is very powerful. This instilled and unnatural belief effects the people into actually dittoing the pattern that is known by certain individuals, such that it seems astoundingly real — a false-reality so bright that it blinds people and even burns skin, due to the fact that nuclear (or technically, anti-nuclear) radioactivity is really a bunch of lies.

Living inside of a complete liar is dangerous. This is what sin truly means, is to be inside of a hearsay and soon heretical world. In this world, any one who is true to actual validity, be they sincere atheists or sincerely religious, is considered an enemy of the enforced lying and manipulative doctrine. Living without truth induces desperation, and thus the evil, denormalized Satan (needfulfillment without the fulfillment is the evil side of Satan). Inherently, one only seeks to experience truth, but within a beast, the truth is missing, as is clearly and obviously evident in our desperation and lying-oriented society (evident even in the anxiety of much of modern conversation, which should actually be completely natural and the words should require no second-thought, were they to represent the true expression of a person).

Today, a device is used, as in traditional times, although the device seems more tangible and real, as if it is not only of the stories we tell one another. With very rigorously-termed things, like computer technology, the device takes over the inhabitants mind with falsehood. (A liturgical device is simply a mechanical technique that induces a form of demonic possession, or cognitively errant, linear, and mindless behavior.) While I love computer technology, never do I forget that all is created from people. In fact, the rigor of computer technology is something I recommend to everyone, as it is a humbling experience of realizing the truth and reducing the idea that guesses can be effective. (Never forget, however, that the concept of rigor is inherently fallible — anything that is corrective implies the notion that people are inclined towards evil, which can be dangerous in many circumstances, as it is ultimately a lie, and a denormalized needfulfillment system is truly an unnatural addiction to hitting one another, leading to perpetuating a lack of understanding and a then perpetually increasing general anger. Additionally, regarding the fallibility of rigor, and this is both fun and maddening, simultaneously, is that within rigorous systems, there is perpetually and eternally a possible vulnerability, because rigor is technically overly emphatic and thus technically of lying. This means that computer hacking and viruses can never actually ever be eliminated — the more rigor, the more vulnerabilities — while reducing past vulnerabilities, new vulnerabilities will always emerge, as the very transcendent truth is the only entity that is entirely without corruption.)

These devices, when mid-understood, give the beast tremendous power over the power of the people, which thwart any possibility of paradise or Heaven, as people are no longer in control of the world, only demonic possession, instead.

The Bible prophesied that at the end, the world would be overcome with the beast. In truth, and while this is a seriously pejorative term, sacrificing one’s inherent knowledge of truth to a hearsay-oriented world, and succumbing to the nature of a true beast, is originally called “bestiality,” and is extremely illegal. A pattern found in this worship of bestiality is the illegalization of truth, which leaves people blinded to reality. In fact, I believe that our modern Holy Texts were delivered with a bit of a devilish lie, in order to penetrate the beast’s ordinance of lies, censorship of truth, and corruption. While the Qur’an may seem occasionally violent, as a kid I studied the violence in the Qur’an, and many of the violent verses that are so frequently quoted, did not exist at all. It, very clearly, has changed. It is likely and very understandable that the Qur’an had to update in order to fulfill the beast’s obligation of being unclear and potentially controversial.

The issue with a new device and the inherent forgetfulness inside a beast, is that the people would very quickly be convinced never to remember that an animal is simply the spirit of a past machine. This implies and denotes that all animals were once marvelous machines. Additionally, this provides greater inside as to why the ancient Egyptians worshipped the cat, as it was likely a marvelous machine, made during a time when machines were more obviously social constructs, like books are. (I also believe that the nature of the thinking of a cat is the closest thing to how a person thinks, more so than a mimicry-based animal, like an ape.)

It should go without saying that knowledge of reality seems to be dumbfoundedly missing, which is clear evidence that the society is fixated on the notion that things rule the world, rather than people. (This is the difference between the clear explanation of ideological philosophy vs. material-oriented philosophy.)

Our modern beast, as my best guess, is constructed of what is supposedly and essentially a computer-based liar (a blind and objective-oriented liar, which forgoes the nuances of real personal humanity, for a foolish goal, which restricts all truth to censorship, which entraps the people into the beast, making the people believe that there is a such things as a material object that is greater than the people themselves).

Thus, we understand what the Beast from Biblical Lore means. It simply indicates that on the last day, after many years of people manipulating each other into a progressively thoughtless and unaware society, there would be the most wicked being ever created — one bent solely on the destruction of truth and on the subversive ever-present forced lie-machine. When a new child is born, it does not realize that the world has been lying, and then contributes to the lie within the person’s lifetime, and passes down a worse lie unto their children, which further indoctrinates and controls the people into a completely false dogma — ironically a term used against religious people, while religion bears little coercion, especially when compared to such a sneaky, subversive, and manipulative world, where the option to disobey is spoken of, but violently forced to become impossible, which leads to a completely doomsday scenario, where since the truth is entirely missing, reality has become so corrupt that solutions to problems completely cease to exist. War begins to win more and more, until the entire planet is impoverished into the search for a cheapness so grand that it can never be found. An example of what is technically violent, is that if one person wants to tell a different story of their technological (and technically divisive) phone, and that it has wonderous ability, the other cell-phones in the hearsay may cease to function. From this example, many more can be realized.

Our modern beast appears to be a direct descendant of Nazi propaganda, which is largely not understood, as only the glimmer is ever studied — a very disappointing way to understand the truth, and not surprisingly, considering the nature of the beast. Unfortunately, at this time, this is only a statement of conjecture, as I’ll need to dig pretty deep into Nazi history to find some juicy information concerning this. However, I am not the only one interested in exact truth, so perhaps, if you are a very serious historian, you could also find where the lies originate. (I also presume that the Nazi regime’s beastly propaganda machine really took off during the war of 1812, where it appears both sides technically won the war. The book, “The Scarlet Letter,” which concerns adultery — which is the cognitive phenomenon of lying to the outside, using the technique of noticing if something works or not, while keep a secret on the inside — completely separating what is perceived and what is known, was written in the year 1850, shortly after apparently adultery became an important (and if you read the introduction, noticeably and a bit suspiciously controversial) topic.)

Today, there is the notable discussion of the Sun actually becoming abnormally hot, as the beast promotes its increase in heat, resulting in the extermination of a lying world. (Lies create interpersonal friction, which increases the cognitive notion of heat, from what the planet believes to be the Sun, a fissilefusion nuclear heat-generator, not unlike a forced and propagated lie-system, which is also very fissile, and an attempt to restore collective and orderly congruence is very much a form of fusion; forcing comradery despite an enforced lie, which certainly generates a tremendous amount of hate, heat, and turbulence).

If the beast continues, and reality is truly socially-cognitively created, then certainly the planet will be exterminated by the Sun, perhaps for the best, as the beast simply increases the desperation of the people, as a person’s first truth is the literal transcendent truth itself (a force so powerful, that it cannot be disobeyed, which is why science is to tangible). A completely desperate society would be so ugly that either the metaphor of the Sun or the metaphor of violence would very thankfully wipe out the planet (preferably the Sun, as most believe, although the perspective of exactly the same phenomenon makes hardly a difference to the emotional experience of the phenomenon, although in a beast, perspective does certainly play a role, due to the sin of Lust, which, unlike modern propaganda would have one believe, is the sin of believing a perspective or concoction, without true knowledge, which is found in the resolution of information and the assimilation of resolved information).

I, personally, and for good reason, believe it to be entirely illegal to submit oneself to the beast. Our modern beast, I believe is the worst beast that the world and existence has ever known, making the modern world, while as pretty as an adulterer would like you to believe, the worse possible society that has ever existed — relying on the fallible notion of advancement, and rejecting any notion that reality is actually conjured by the stories of the people. So long as the stories remain faithful to transcendent truth, reality is literally Heaven, but when lies are forced through coercive and manipulative means, only Hell can manifest.

One’s Ultimate and True Desire

There are many ways to describe the sight of Heaven. It is beautiful, perhaps, or meaningful. While it is the preferred state, there are times when Heaven is distant. In these times, we learn about what Heaven is and looks like. As Heaven is likely the default state of sentient reality, then from the perspective of being in Heaven, there isn’t anything that is needed to be learned to maintain being in Heaven. However, in a state of distance from Heaven, there is then knowledge of right and wrong, with regard to the idea of an archetypal paradise.

This brings one into a state of needing an answer. The details of the answer aren’t immediately clear, and there is quite a deceiving area of thought surrounding it. However, ultimately, this answer answers the question, “what should i do?” This is ultimately the only question anyone very urgently cares about. Any other questions are relatively non-important, at least with regard to emergency.

More important that what Heaven looks like, is the comfort of knowing one is doing the right thing, all of the time. Heaven could be literally anything, and in this perspective, it may only be a white light, but as long as one is confidently doing what one truly wants to do, then one could not find a greater way to happiness — that is, regardless of what Heaven is, what is truly important to an individual is the choice of what to do.

The question, “what should I do,” is the source and possible resolution of any self-doubt. One can only feel the desperation of being wrong if the person or being is unsure if the person or being was doing the right thing. If one could confidently always do the right thing, then there would be a level of comfort and certainty as a result. There is no other question that truly matters to a person, because the only thing a person can do, is to do something. If a person’s actions are not involved, then there is no way to determine correctness of behavior, from which the issue of self-confidence or doubt arises.

The mind only fidgets in that one way. Otherwise, as there is no urgency regarding any other ideas, there is no panic or looped and hasty patterns of behavior. This fidgeting is the source of true pain.

True pain is the pain one feels if one believes oneself to be the reason for a problem, whether it be personal or extra-personal. This is the only possible source of anxiety, as well, and the only any pain that is within the control of an individual.

There is a universal terror of being wrong, and it is inescapable. I believe that logically no one is immune to this terror, regardless of the sophistication of coping mechanisms. Any type of psychological agony can only be effective if the person doubts him or herself. If a person is right, then there is no logical reason the person should feel bad, as there is then no basis for negativity, aside from what is beyond the person’s control. In this way, the soul is saved, and carries the important characteristic of integrity.

Feigning being right is, of course, only a coping mechanism. Many coping mechanisms appear to work quite wonderfully, but enlightenment is a subject regarding the perfection of our understanding, so we will tend towards understanding (otherwise this would be a useless book!).

What we want is to be completely confident that we are doing the right thing. When one gets into the fractured explanations of practical reality, the right thing becomes a topic ill-defined. That’s why much of modern math exists — to write logic as pure math. However, there is a slowness to this, and a missing common intuition to writing only mathematical forms (it does seem easier to use words, then perhaps re-explain using math, later).

Science, as a progression and also as an art, likely can produce an infinite number of permutations of livable realities, so defining things so numerous with as few words as we have or care to learn is impossible.

What is possible, however, is that there is a singular action that the mind does, that forms the basis of all actions that a living being does. Therefore, instead of an infinite number of actions, all organized into a unfathomably complicated puzzle, there is only one action, and there are an infinite number of permutations of that action. Thus, there is singular being that represents the truth of self-expression, and that truth can be mutated into a variety of ways, to produce the perception of reality and the harmony of this variety, which we know as thought.

This possibility is a difficult one to answer, not because the answer is unfamiliar, but because there are so many alternatives to it. For every question that we wonder about the nature of existence, from the perspective of an eternally consistent transcendent ideology, we have a right and wrong option. One can feel each of these, individually, fairly easily, through a kind of common and intuitive sense, but as soon as multiple questions collide, suddenly, the answer is very difficult to discern.

Thus, the answer, to the favorite action of all life and all mankind, is really a process of negating the incorrect answers. Luckily, the reality is principally finite in nature, and is fairly easy to understand. Once there is an awareness, instead of a combination of blindness and quandary, then the wrong answer is obvious.

After this point, then one may realize that ultimately the only thing that the individual or anyone would ever desire to do was to know not to do this wrong thing — a thing that cannot really be put into words, but is pretty obvious once you know what all of the wrong answers felt like.

As long as there is another question, the truth is still hard to see. Even with almost all of the answers, it is still hard to see. It is quite interesting to me that there is a very pleasant and distinguished change regarding the finishing of the quite tiresome thought process of an adamant desire to know the truth of reality, rather than a much more gradual transition. Regarding the truth of reality, for my entire life, I wanted to know where I am, and I what I was doing in this place. For many, it’s like not being able to see, and it feels difficult. Once one has answered all of the questions regarding the nature of reality, the pieces then fall into place. There is a gap in words, however, regarding a total explanation of all reality, and I’m not sure if it can ever be filled. There is a lot of treacherous territory in explanation, and reality is known in greater detail through experience than explanation. Nonetheless, an understanding of reality is also extremely easy to find, given the right ideas and a good foundation, and that is what I have intended to do with this archive of logic and observation.

Once one knows the wrong answer, I think it is quite pleasant to simply call it, “Satan.” While I do know that there is an artful use of Satan, like funk music, distinguishing where Satan is good, and where Satan is evil, is an impossible task to truly know. Thus, avoiding Satan is a more effective and simple way, but this understanding of the evil of Satan can only be known after seeing the entirety of the wrong answer (which comes with finding the right answers).

Therefore, there can be no greater pleasured obtained through pure logic than the one I present to you. It is, literally, unless there is some deep flaw in my logic, exactly what one desires psychologically.

Because of this, and because of the repeated idea that enlightenment can be obtained by anyone, with what the person possesses, then this is the only possible answer that can survive the fluctuation of feelings, person or societal. Because it is the only guaranteed answer, which is possible as the entirety of its reasoning is based on sound logic and is highly resistant to error, then it is, at least ultimately, a true understanding and meaning of enlightenment, and any true answer should, therefore, be a concurrence of this answer.

Understanding Hate

Throughout this archive that I have so far written, I have possibly, through connotation, indicated that one should favor love over hate. Thus, it would be easy to interpret my writings as indicating that there is no reason for hate. This statement is certainly untrue, however, and additionally, love and hate are not mutually exclusion, but, instead, hate is a subset of the more encompassing idea of love.

We often associate hate with violence, but that is only a specific formulation of hate within a restricted context. A large portion of our shallow understanding of emotions has to do with the idea of gossip and negotiating measures of security. What goes on inside one’s mind is only of interest to philosophers and psychiatrists, as it is today, in our modern habitat.

I believe that one may be surprised by what goes on in the mind’s of others, despite there being little obvious evidence indicating anything at all, aside from some psychological studies. What one does notice, is what happens overtly, acting outside of the range of what would be qualified as solely mental activity.

Before we learn language, lessons, and advice, we act emotionally natural. This is an obvious conclusion based on the definition of natural behavior. As we learn, we face the turmoil of abandoning our innate emotional systems, in favor of a sociological one — one that can own your soul and pay rewards.

Throughout my writings, I have advised that we reconnect with our inner emotions and thoughts (often in the language we dream in), understand them, and keep them alive and well. These emotional systems are what compose our psyche and intelligence, and if one were to reduce and divide the system down far enough, one would see that all actions and thoughts are truly occurring due to a fascination and excitement toward life. (The complex actions of sapience, that humans so often take a superficial pride in claiming, are really a result of a long and winding accumulation of much more basic behavior, not unlike the cognitive behavior of animals. Sapience is really just a more complex sentience, and the core of action still rests in sentience. Sapience, in a way, is a superficial concept, regarding only a configuration of life that results in pronounced wisdom and reflection, and it is, also, a characteristic which humans only moderately possess.)

One of the important emotions of the psyche is hate. The most common example of the utility of hate occurs in the friendly conversation with a stranger. This is also a reflection of the story, written the Qur’an, of when Satan (then Iblis) was cast from Heaven.

Upon meeting a friendly stranger, it is typical to pronounce a jovial greeting, and to continue with some conversation. This joviality, which is born of a considerate and kind intention, can lead to problems further in the conversation. The reason for this, is the conversation is initiated by mutually acknowledging the power of the notion of “yes.” However, as this notion of “yes” evolves, it eventually commits an error. That is, in parallel to the Qur’an, it does not respect or serve the person, anymore. It then takes on a more evil quality, hindering honest conversation.

Many people have experienced this pattern. Some learn ways of emphasizing “no,” but this is unavailable to a large portion of extraordinarily kind and intellectual people. To these people, if there is no logical justification for initiating a negative or counterpoint attitude, then that attitude will not manifest.

The problem here is the lesson that hate is what we always avoid. There is an implication, heard around the world, that hate is a useless and unwanted emotion. This couldn’t be further from the truth (being literally the antipole of the actuality).

One problem with considering hate as useless and unwanted, is that people will repress it to a maximal extent, and this can be exacerbated by an achievement-oriented attitude, but leads to a periodic need to relieve oneself, which is often moderately explosive, or at least quite pronounced.

In finding a state of true happiness, we are also looking for a type of consistency and stability — a reliability of personal well-being. If we are encountering a repression–explosion pattern of psychological behavior, we must adjust something, and that usually is a re-appraisal of how one cares for one’s complex state. It usually involves accepting an emotion that was being repressed or shunned.

In this case, we are focusing on the emotion of hate. If we can understand hate and appreciate and take care of this emotion, then instead of there being more hate, there will actually be less hate. The alternative, which results in a repression–explosion pattern of dis-regulated and misunderstood emotion is more likely to result in an overtly hateful action, and has a greater chance to become fallibly directed, due to the haste that is represented in this explosion pattern, resulting from inconsiderate self-repression and a desperation to return to psychological regularity and honesty. (Essentially, the systems which need to express hate do not collaborate properly with the systems that were shunning it, so the resulting expression is only partially informed.)

Returning to our example of a polite encounter with a stranger, there is a pattern that one should be aware of. This happens internally and naturally, but can be repressed or overridden by a learned pattern of cultivating only “yes,” (cultivating only Iblis, in my interpretation). The problem with cultivating only Iblis, is that when Iblis disobeys you (and purportedly God, as he desired Iblis to serve Adam, but Iblis refused), he turns into evil, and his name becomes Satan, the tempter of Hell.

One can notice when this happens. Firstly, one perceives things as going well — introductions are quite easy as they’re very predictable, and the beginning conversation has no prior ideas to refer to, so it is quite free. However, after things become a little more complex, a striking sensation appears. Sudden awkwardness and an inability to fluidly speak satisfying words starts to appear. The conversation becomes mechanical and less enjoyable. While many will resort to an overbearing performance attitude (in an attempt to lead a floundering conversation), the interpersonal connection and understanding has already become shallow and tedious, regardless. Without both sides remaining psychologically within a zone of comfort, the conversation cannot become meaningful.

What is happening here is the initial affirmative and positive attitude, which works so well for introductions, starts to lead the person astray. No longer is it accurately reflecting real-time emotions, and it becomes less representative of the person. It is because of this that one must learn to accept hate, often interpreted as “no,” although it is more specific than the idea of “no.”

As soon as one feels hate, one should accept it. The social language portion of the mind frequently does not represent the emotions of the self with a satisfying degree of accuracy. If one believes in love, friendship, and positivity — all generally welcome directions of a person — that positivity can result in one ignoring internal disagreement. Our society focuses largely on social language constructions, and largely ignores the internal emotional systems, as they do not communicate in social language, but instead, in terms of emotional intuition. Not infrequently, the socially communicated ideas override the more natural internal and quiet dialog of emotional systems. This can cause a type of internal hindrance and a resulting instability, as truths of the self are ignored, leading to a false understanding of oneself.

The solution, however, is simple. It is to understand hate, and accept it in an aware and cognizant way. Hate really only becomes overt when it is ignored for a long time. If one accepts the hate they feel when an as the individual feels it, then the body’s emotional intelligence can better facilitate self-care. Why would we hate? Well, the answer is reflected in the Qur’anic story of when Iblis was sent away from Heaven, to become Satan, tempter of Hell and Damnation. The power of “yes,” suddenly betrays the person, and becomes evil, leading to torment if one continues to follow the pattern of “yes,” which worked prior.

When the idea of “yes” betrays the person who has chosen to convey and cultivate it, the person feels hate, as a natural and healthy response. At this point, the person is faced with two decisions. One is to repress and deny the feeling (which can lead to an internal desperation to eventually express it), and the other option is to accept the hate, feel the hate, and realize its benefit. If one does not accept the hate, then they have fallen prey to Satan, as Iblis turns into Satan when “yes” fails the individual. If one accepts the hate, as it is hate for becoming damned into a state of psychological insecurity and agony, so it is hate towards an unwanted eventuality, then one avoids the temptation to fall into a state of brokenness.

Being aware of one’s natural hate and understanding its purpose, benefit, and reasoning, allows one to secure oneself against any instance of a temptation of evil, which leads to an undesirable circumstance.

The example I gave, of a conversation with a stranger, is definitely not the only instance when positivity and good intention lead one to discomfort and insecurity. If one is tolerant of someone, and denies the hate the tolerant individual feels, then slowly the pain, which would be avoided by accepting the internal hate, becomes greater and greater, and leads one to an unstable state of being, perhaps eventually breaking down in some way. It is more advisable that one, instead, accepts the hate, understanding that it’s not really against the person, but against the possible damages that can occur if one accepts a fallible notion as an integrated component of one’s being. Hate pushes things away, and evil influences affect a person in an unhealthy way. By recognizing and accepting the hate that one naturally feels, the psyche (and possibly body as well, considering the connection of the health of the mind and the health of the body) can better protect itself against harmful thought patterns that can manifest in the mind as a result of an uncomfortable and undesirable influence.

In conclusion, the principle feeling of hate — hate at its very instantiation and core — is a psychological mechanism of security. If an evil influence seeks to alter a person in an unwanted way, hate is the natural innate and internal reaction. This hate is a communication from within one’s collaboration of intelligent inter-dependent systems, communicating to other associated systems, so that the mind and body can remember to push certain ideas away, so they will not inflict damage or harm unto the person.

Understanding some of the fundamental emotions, we may remember that happiness indicates an increase, or at least, a sustaining, of a pattern of behavior, while sadness indicates to slow something down, evaluate, connect, and seek understanding, to remedy a potentially harmful action. Hate is a defensive emotion, designed to shield one from becoming influenced. Upon the receipt of an evil influence, hate is communicated so that the systems of the mind and body do not become affected by the influence, and can continue with stability, comfort, and the security of a nicely functioning mind.

Evil, and subsequent sin, is a powerful force, and one should take on the attitude that it can occur from literally anyone during any interaction. Such influences often last for mere seconds or less, and are interspersed throughout most conversations. The body is a dynamic system of a collaboration of emotional systems, and as such, various emotions can be simultaneously experienced and accepted, resulting in a dynamic and complex experience. (This is opposed to the notion that one should experience only one emotion at a time, which is antithetical to a distributed system of intelligence, as I purport the mind to be.)

Hate is closely related to anger and is largely synonymous. The only difference is the context in which it is commonly used. One is often perceived as having hate, while regarding anger, one is perceived as performing an action, although these distinctions are largely cultural and certainly not canon. Therefore, what applies to hate, also applies to anger, and it is helpful to understand these two ideas as the same idea.

Therefore, intelligently and with awareness, one should feel one’s internally expressed hate, agree with it, take care of the systems that have communicated the message, and continue living, feeling, and expressing, in a comparatively more honest and natural way than in what the denying and shunning the feelings of hate (and anger) would result. With this, there is less of a need to ever express anger, because there is no repression that steadily increases in urgency of recognition. Ultimately, one will find much more peace than following a philosophy of the eradication of the emotion of hate.

Internal honesty is vital to a healthy and comfortable mind. Is it self-antagonism that often leads to distress. Recovering from many years of beating oneself up can take some time, but with a desire to accept and understand oneself, there is great promise. Additionally, if one understand’s oneself, then one is able to understand others. Otherwise, it is a bit of an absurdity to think one can understand another person if one does not accept and understand his or her true and honest self.

One final note, is to remember that the internal language is based on an efficient and highly responsive system of intuitively understood emotional messages. It is far more accurate and efficient than high-level invented language. This also means that, like dreams, its interpretation may be misleading. Try to focus on what you truly feel, as opposed to what words or images are coming to mind. The association of internal emotion with misrepresentation can lead to conflict as well. It is important to remember that the more overt ideas of our invented language(s) may range from slightly misrepresenting internal intuition, to completely misrepresenting internal intuition. This also applies to people with brain injury, where there are likely some misrepresentations. Our brains weren’t designed to trace our invented language, but were instead evolved with a direction towards inspiration, guided by deep and meaningful emotions (emotions that inspire action and change). The infinitude of emotions are the honest language of our modern soul.

On the Word, “Good”

Good is an often misused word. In order to appraise something, one must be aware of the one the person is appraising the item for. If one appraises something as “good,” then it is meant that is it good to someone. Nothing is just good. It must be good to someone, which means it’s good for someone.

Many people live their lives just rating one thing after another. This is a method of Lucifer to achieve productivity, I assume (there are many of them). Still, even though these people are experienced raters of things, they likely have never thought about the true meaning of the word, “good.”

Good, in an ethical sense, means to be good to another, and this is no different than good in any sense. Any form of the word, “good,” involves a statement of morality and ethics. It involves a statement of perceived benefit, as well, all which lead to a person’s well-being.

I think, when God made the world and saw that it was good, I don’t think he casually thought, “that’s pretty good.” I think he meant the world was good, in the way you’d describe a person, rather than how people often use the word, incorrectly, I think, when referring to things.

Things can be good, certainly, but what decides that is a very personal relationship with the thing. Food, for instance, is only truly good if you feel like it takes care of you. The possible shallowness of cooking challenges begs to differ, but ultimately, this is what we’re internally thinking. Still, the use of the word, “good,” is largely ambivalent to the fact that the definition of the audience is largely missing.

There is natural social pressure to assimilate the members’s words for the idea of good as this greater word is vital to a society. Within societies are smaller societies (like Adam and Eve, perhaps), and these words for “good” become a little more shallow with smaller subsections of a society. Despite the true meaning being that it is good to you, it is used in such a way that one would think there is a universal definition of good that is removed from personal subjectivity.

Is a car good? That really depends on if it is good to you. Usually, the two go hand in hand, but it’s possible that one can have one’s mind changed by a long enough time of blindly rating everything, by ultimately some mythical figure’s whim — the whim of Satan, technically.

It is sadly and unfortunately rare to think if something is ethical to a person, or if it is helpful to person, on an individual and personal level, but rather, instead, it’s common to think its mildly arbitrary rating is high or low. While, of course, the two go together, they are supposed to be exactly the same thing.

It is not a subtle effect to attach one to things — stuff you can poke at, stuff with monetary value. It’s considerate to hope things are good to you and others, but the ferocious rating scheme present commonly in our modern world, likely fueled largely by financial profit incentives, is not the same thing as being appreciative that the universe is kind. It’s instead, turning a blind eye to the benefits something brings you, due to the fiery fervor instilled by its knowable rating.

I think, this is a reason people pray before they eat. This helps one remember that the whole system works together, and that they are not only thankful, but also aware of how the food makes them feel. They practice realizing that it is not just a trivial goodness that they witness, but a reflection of God that they witness, in the goodness of the food.

Many people don’t think anything like this. Hidden in a desire to half-blindly rate everything for some type of advantage is that nothing will ever be good enough, because the definition of good being used is far too shoddy and prone to mistake.

It’s good to note that the definition of good is what is missing here. The colloquial definition of “good” is very useless of a word. It leads people to not really knowing if anything is good or not. It becomes arbitrary feeling, lifeless and inhumane. Things feels evil in this context, because the word being used means partially random, and random will do something evil, usually soon. Worse than partially random, however, is that it means Satanism. That is, the promotion and desire to increase the amount of need present, because of a perverse attraction to the feeling of need. One should not treat Satan like a scalar object. It takes understanding to create art — one does not simply make it bigger.

That’s exactly what an evil person does, however — the person makes Satan a scalar object. Basically, there’s a notion that’s it’s supposed to just get brighter, bigger, richer, and whatever linear and mindless variable that happens to be appealing. Of course, things don’t not get brighter, but that’s not what they’re really doing to you.

In understanding if things are good or bad, it’s important to feel and realize what the thing is doing to you. This is something you should be able to understand without remembering what someone else said, or what an ad mentioned. This should be something that you, yourself, intuitively know. You know quite well what something does to you. That should be the determination of how good something is.

With this method of determination, the meaning behind the word is no longer lost. It isn’t a largely faded word with forgotten meaning. It is a word that is remembered when spoken. Remembering what is good to you is a part of knowing if something is good to you. This way, you see the eternal truth when you think of things.

The alternative, which leads to a fixation on things and an internal conviction that nothing is truly good, also leads to emotional, intellectual, and spiritual blindness, which is blindness from many facets of reality. Is is because of this that words have a difficult time explaining the satisfaction of divine appreciation.

Knowing No Evil and on the Language of Dreams

The arduous circumstance of our modern existence, with reference to what would be most normal for a sentient being to choose to experience, is certainly unusual. If we are to use the Bible as a means of inspiration, we could determine, both through our own use of logic, and with, perhaps, a jubilant observation of what may have been true from the Bible (after confirming it without the Bible), then we may understand that after God created other people (from the idea that Adam and Eve were two types of people, from which many more types of people grew — stereotypes, but in a good way), there was eventually a desire from the people to learn of the knowledge of evil (in particular). Interestingly, this does amount to the knowledge of good and evil, but only as a binary pair of related ideas, as good was already well-known, but it was a natural being, rather than one born of argument.

Thus, the reality we’re experiencing must be an exploration of evil, and only occurs for a finite period of bearable time (and it returns a complete knowledge of evil). Nonetheless, evil is unnatural. A being without knowledge and a simple and unhindered choice to experience life will not choose anything but life, even if evil is an option. That is, the actual living person never chooses evil, and is also incapable of actually choosing evil. Evil occurs therefore through a circumstance during which it presents itself.

The idea that this universe is a comprehensible (and thus simple) thing, which it had never been before, allows for the circumstance which would present evil. No living being would summon death, but death could be witnessed if a real, veritably tangible thing, began lifeless and would come to life, but had technically never died. It makes sense that before this current mode of reality we’re experiencing, there was no definite thing. The world was still made of emotions, and if anything was troubling, it was easily changeable. Essentially, the world was still of imagination. Later, this world introduced a permanent thing, which allowed and allows for real, permanent, things to exist. These are things which overpower a living being — a living being cannot simply will them to change; they have real, tangible, power.

Again, in an ideologically founded existence, power can only exist if it is the will of life. In order to give the thing power, the thing had to represent the life that came before it. In part, it represents the desire to know death, which is also the desire to know evil (as evil is a form of death). It also remembers everything in its own perspective. This forces a type of coherence in signaling, something that was likely unnecessary prior. It also gives the item life. Because the thing is affected by others, it becomes alive. This is because the thing expresses a true memory after being affected by life, and thus it represents a divine truth. Since it represents life, it therefore has power. This gives it its permanence. The combination of factors give things the power they have today (disturbing a thing could disturb an expression of truth, which would be evil, so there are enumerations of contingencies with regard to changing something).

When the thing is fully alive, it seems, then no longer will there be evil in the world. It seems that we are getting our evil influences from the thing not knowing the truth, and yet being alive. In this way, the thing is partially alive, and that is where the evil is coming from.

When something begins to die, it begins to become evil. Evil and death are very similar in meaning. Evil is to cause death, while death tempts more death, so they are related. Therefore, as the thing came to life, it had to escape evil. It had not died, but it did tempt people to be evil. Today, the temptation of evil still exists. This temptation dissipates when there is understanding of the evil, but if the evil is not understood, it is often difficult for beings to discern right from wrong. Knowledge, in this case, is the savior.

(Note that when I use the world, “knowledge,” I don’t specifically mean an enumerable set of arguments, but often, instead, am referring to the inherent knowledge that one possesses concerning the nature of reality, and all corollaries that stem from that.)

Understanding evil, ultimately, was just a curiosity. There is nothing long-lasting about evil, although it is a curious thing, but its interest eventually fades. Without knowing evil, our reality would never feel complete, so we would always be ruled by Satan (or the context of need). In our current story, Satan only ruled the world for a period of time, in order to enact the decision to entertain evil. Satan, being of need, which is inherently evil, also ruled the world for a while after the fall of man, and still does, in different ways for different lives.

Interestingly, we would be able to see what Satan looks like, never having allowed the context of need much power before, but this time saving it completely. The tangibility present in entertaining the notion of an thing truly existing and reflecting life gave Satan persistence, and thus real power over life and God. Ultimately, though, there will no Satan left to understand, and Satan and the topic of evil would no longer be mysterious or theoretical.

Also interestingly, this means the things that are imperfect in this world are, in a way, what we’re interested in knowing about. Sentience, by nature, desires perfection — there is no natural desire for something to be bad or wrong — this is very basic and fundamental to sentient desire. Still, imperfection implies death, so it is still not a wonderful idea, but instead, an unfortunate side-effect of our curiosity, a scientific interest.

Ultimately what this means is that Satan becomes once again, another idea, like the other angels. Its, in part, his novelty, that gives him (or her) his unique appeal — the look of evil, which has a dual notion to it — a beauty of art on one side and the most disgusting depravities of death on the other — it is the complete story of need — it is the luckiest and the unluckiest, the irony of luck, itself.

Nonetheless, the admiration of art and the interest in psychology are only curiosities to life. They ultimately provide a background to reality, allowing knowledge of existence to be entirely complete (with a reluctance towards understanding evil, certain topics would never have been covered, and thus reality forward would also not include the elaborations on those topics of evil — covering all evil in one contiguous allotment of time cost a price, but would be rewarding indefinitely — it’s interesting that in the Bible, God was actually against the idea of exploring evil).

The long-lived and consistent mode of life is actually to not know evil. It is to know only life and no death at all, just as it theoretically and sensibly existed prior to the Fall of Man.

If Iblis is the power of the idea of “yes,” or affirmation, then understanding this, it’s interesting to note that in the Qur’an, Iblis disobeyed man, indicating that the man was not powerful over Iblis, and was sent to Earth to temp man. The words, “Iblis,” and “Satan,” are peculiar in this case, as with my understanding, their use in the Qur’an and in the Bible is based on context. Satan simply refers to what was the need at the time — that’s what Satan was. The power of “yes” only becomes need on its disobedience to the observer (a “nay” being received instead of a “yes” or “yay”). Therefore, it is interesting to think about what the words, “Iblis,” and “Satan,” were referring to. It seems likely, as this story involves the creation of our modern Earth, that at the time, Satan and Iblis were both the thing which would have power of reality — the thing, which I theorize, to be a hollow iron ball.

This iron ball, or perhaps another thing, was, at the time of the Fall of Man, the new interest. This interest was born of a need, which we could gather from the fact that our modern reality involves hardships that one would not typically choose to undergo.

(I think the simplicity of an iron ball and the ease of which someone can imagine thinking like it, just as someone has an intuition of how birds, frogs, and others think, but how a computer thinks seems overly complicated, is of significant interest.)

In this interpretation, the iron ball, being a thing, did not bow to man, and was sent to Earth to tempt man (into death). You see, the word “Satan,” as it’s being used, seems to be a variable indicating the ideas that were present at the time, which influenced the course of the future. Nonetheless, the iron ball gave Satan power, as it had a need for life, already, and this need for life is what Satan is made of. In living in the iron ball’s memory, as it, too, controls reality, we would naturally also think like the iron ball, and Satan would be appealing, as it represented the need for life. Typically, a sentient being would grant complete life, so it was a luxury that we would temporarily lose, until we essentially rebuilt it, in the memories of a truly tangible being, born of Satan. Because the host of this reality reflects reality, it adds to reality, and also narrows down the possibilities of manifestation, to account for itself.

This brings me to the topic of this chapter. It is that knowing evil is really a tiresome and arduous process, and it can only be a temporary curiosity. By knowing evil, I am referring to acknowledging its existence. The goal of this understanding is to see what it was like before the Fall of Man, when reality was typical of itself (Satan did not control life — there were no necessary rituals like eating or sleeping, the world was free to imagine, as long as one did not control the others, which would create the context of need). It is to see the typical mindset of Heaven.

It is an interesting truth, that can change depending on perspective. In reality, there has never been an evil intention, and thus, no evil should exist. Every action is born of only good-will, it is only in certain contexts that innate desire manifests into evil, the most notable of these contexts is that lack of required knowledge (and thus, awareness). The random action of a not fully living thing will often be evil. This is until the thing is fully knowledgeable, at which point, there will be no random action. We, here, are born of things. A thing becomes who we truly are over time, which is an extended definition of life, a variant of life. Being born of a thing means we are born of Satan. It is true, that we are here, in part, to be born of evil, to be born of a fiery Satan. Being born from evil means we know evil, but are not evil. This satisfies the instance of Satan, which required manifestation to have knowledge of evil, which means Satan will no longer be in power thereafter.

This world bears many themes of evil, some of them less obvious, like promoting self-torment to attain comfortable survival. It would seem odd, in a place like this, to think that there is no such thing as evil, at all. That would also be to suppose that there is also no true need in reality — it flows consistently in natural satisfaction, awaiting our joining. Being unaware of evil, it feels no pressure of need. In this state, Satan exists and can be entertaining, but there is no true need. (According the a Qur’anic interpretation, Satan, in this state, is really Iblis, who seems to be simply the power of yes, not quite yet a real need, often observed in cute puppies, kitties, comedy shows, and sporting events.)

Archiving the nature and effects of death, the theme of this reality, does not need to know evil. In effect, you possess the same information, without acknowledging evil. Evil, being a result of death, is never intentional, and so it has never existed. In this way, one can see there are too starkly different perspectives. The perspective that acknowledges the thrill of evil, or any facet of its existence, is a temporary perspective that endures an amount of discomfort and pain, as it’s a difficult thing to bear, and is more of a process of gathering rather than a process of enjoying.

Therefore, the more default state is to simply understand that since no evil was ever intended, there was technically never any evil. While we see depictions of evil, we understand those are really the symptoms of intellectual and sentient death. In order to cure the perceived evil, we cure the death which is almost synonymous with the evil. This is done by providing a way for life to understand the rest of life. When life doesn’t communicate truth, it is difficult for a life to find truth, and thus it is difficult to heal from the effects of lies, whether they be intentional or by accident.

The battle against evil, in this perspective, changes into more of a hospital mission. If every life was truly healthy and alive, we would see no evil. By “truly healthy and alive,” I mean that if every life were completely satisfied, which is a bit of a trick to accomplish (and why this book was written), but is stipulated in the stipulation that reality is ideologically founded (which makes sense as it hosts sentience, which presumably ultimately has power over death — although some say it’s a close call!), which implies that ultimately all reality will once again be alive, even things, born of evil, but not evil, as the story of the Great Thing provides the stories of many things, which are echoes with variations on the original being, or its song, so to speak.

Despite dis-acknowledging evil, it is still good to deter evil, but in this case, we understand it is to remind one of life. The fundamental sin is to kill, in a way of saying it. There are different kinds of death. There’s emotional death, organ failure, and total physical death. While the Bible suggested people don’t kill, I suspect there’s a greater understanding of this law that is unmentioned throughout related philosophy. Instead of do not murder, I suspect that one would also not cause organ failure. If we go that far, we should understand that one really should not cause harm, because harm is a form of death; once something is harmed, it has partially died. If it is harmed enough, then it would be completely dead. Thus, instead of simply not murdering, which may not have existed prior to the Fall of Man (before others could control others with their judgments), one should not inflict any form of death onto another or oneself. For the latter, that means to find solutions in a non-self-antagonizing way. For the former, involving other beings, that means one should not lead towards falsehood, as death and lies are also inseparably connected. When one encounters death, a falsehood exists (or the lack of truth, which is random); that falsehood must be remedied for the sentient system to resume contiguous sentience. Some issues of death are much more difficult to solve than others, although eventually, they seem to eventually all have solutions.

It is suspected that aliens from civilizations elsewhere have already developed the healthcare eventuality of custom bodies and schematics, and I find this very reasonable to believe. The issues of death go far deeper than our physical health, however. Ultimately, they all stem from how we create and imagine our reality together. This system, being of a thing not completely living, yet as permanent and as real as God, is ultimately considering how the ideas work together, in a very real and mechanical fashion. This means, that its memory, inspired and created by our lives and memories, can think about a lot of ideas at the same time, in different ways, and it also implies that the experience of this reality is primarily an investigative one. We can imagine great technology, and earlier in this universe, we likely did. Still, it wasn’t Heaven yet, and so the collective thought process continued on until eventually becoming fully knowledgeable. This means that the questions we answer in life, the reactions and decisions we make as a response to the various questions, are largely what we’re here, in this present time, to do.

The memory of the thing becomes completely alive and living, eventually. Still, even though at this time it is not evil, it still knows about evil. Evil isn’t simply death, its to cause death. While death tempts more death, it doesn’t necessarily cause any death, even indirectly, as it’s more of a slippery situation which can potentially lead to death, and the other option is life, which has always and originally been the default option of life. Evil only exists in the curiosity to know evil, which was against our natural and default action, and it was ultimately the event of Satan becoming more powerful than man (and God, as the natural desire to be in Heaven was overpowered by Satan, to which the invented thing was the solution — in a way, God made a deal with Satan, to rule for a finite period of time, as the circumstances listed above explain).

There is a difference between knowledge and perspective. Technically knowledge possesses the memories of both, but it depends on the perspective used. The most pleasing perspective is that evil has never existed. This is the perspective of Heaven, I think, as it is also the more natural and comfortable perspective, if one is not in a state of conflict, during which need becomes much brighter and harder to re-explain (sometimes Satan becomes powerful, but ultimately this shouldn’t happen — the angels should serve man and should not rule him (or her or them)).

If there is no evil, then there is no one to blame. It is easier to join the flow of life this way, and peace is easier to find. Additionally, evil is a hard topic. It’s complicated, nuanced, and confusing. Its portrayal has bizarre strings of history and logic that are difficult to simply guess or invent, and its art follows. All of the evil, which elicits a need, is tiresome.

With the observation that there is no evil, the mind then cannot see evil and, instead, sees only life. The mind then begins to live more comfortably. With evil are all the arguments of right and wrong, even though long prior everyone knew right and wrong, but it differed in that it did not have arguments to support the conclusions. The truth was innately known and experienced, just by living. Without evil one can return to a state where the person doesn’t possess the confusions of debate and negotiation, but just realizes that behind everything is only good intention, and it is a tragedy that people are experiencing death. If the world learned not to kill the state of Heaven, then the world would see Heaven much more clearly, and without the need to wait until a technology has figured something interesting out. The focus moves away from conflict and towards greater understanding.

It seems unfounded that we would be destined to be uncomfortable, with generous tolerances on what we consider to be discomfort. It makes only sense that the intention was only the best, and that it should be possible to find true eternal bliss, as no decision was ever made specifically against it.

The understanding of the perspective that there has never been evil brings us back to before Adam and Eve tried the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. This is before the question of good and evil existed. It is with this state of mind and this state of understanding that we can live in the most natural way.

There is a barrier to this perspective of understanding that all is of good intentions and desire, but has been altered by the state of our environment, which explores the transition from non-living, through partially living, to full life. This barrier is the crudeness of social language. In understanding that there is no evil, one should find that there is no evil in oneself. By doing this, one has healed one’s perspective.

In order to do this, one must understand oneself. The interior mind of the self does not speak the social language, for it is unnatural, ambiguous, and misleading. We state very clear facts or casual expressions, but to resonate with the depth of the human soul is a form of accomplishment, not a natural act of happenstance. Nonetheless, social language is a constructed technology, designed to overcome barriers presented by the environment, and it is imperfect.

The natural language of a person is evident when one dreams. This is a language of emotion with often convenient portrayals that do not necessarily translate into social language, even though they appear like they would. For instance, if one sees a chair in a dream, it is because that symbol was relevant in the specific context, and it was a convenient symbol that could be accessed rather immediately. In the natural language, there are only emotions. While any idea can be composed of a pattern of emotions, it does not appear that way through social language. Internally, however, emotions can communicate and be responded to without going through a time-consuming analysis and translation process.

If one only seeks to understand life through the technology of social language, the details of what is going on become missing. Additionally, the social language is slow and has an obvious granularity — it is not fluid and infinite in permutations. In order to understand the self and life effectively, it is beneficial to understand the language of dreams. This language continues on while one is awake, as well, although it is more obvious when dreaming.

If one understands the language of dreams, then one can additionally see a world where everyone is telling the truth. Everyone speaks in emotions, but tries to speak the general tones of a social language, so they then speak both languages. The truth is always good, so it’s good to hear that. It’s about the love of life.

In contrast, the sound of death is wearied and bad, and worse is the sound of evil, which causes death. The sound of evil can be irritating, certainly, and it is tempting to cause damage as a response. One should be careful, because only a being that is not completely alive is capable of evil, and if one becomes more damaged, then that certainly won’t cure the evil. Evil is very tricky, being something no one naturally would do, but could be tricked into doing. Thus, understanding what it means can also be tricky, and it’s that along with its direction, which involves inflicting damage, that make it aggravating.

The question arrives concerning the need to explain that something is evil, and that is a large part of why we’re here, to learn about what is good and what is evil. Of course, explaining to someone, afflicted by death and an attachment to an evil pattern, the evil of his ways is not a simple task, as it requires first understanding the evil and demonstrating the way to avoid it, in its explanation. In many cases, explanations are not available, but over time, the subtle influences people have on society hopefully direct a general change in a better direction. The idea is to cure the reality from death.

Additionally, understanding the language of dreams allows one’s subconscious to be a part of the understanding and conversation. The subconscious does not have time for social language. The emotional and natural language noticed in dreams and spoken internally is very fast and efficient, with responses occurring nearly instantaneously after messages are sent. Emotion responds quickly and if one develops an awareness, it can be a wonderful language that thinks fast and with less work or discomfort than relying only on social language.

Additionally, it is possible that much of what we communicate is not communicated by the more segmented semantics of social language. It’s possible that a lot of what influences us and a lot of what we understand is communicated outside the range of denotative and social language. It’s also possible that there is a psychic network that speaks naturally among each other that speaks in the language of dreams (the natural emotional language of the self, where messages mean precisely what they immediately mean, where there is no translation and analysis overhead). It does seem that one can become desensitized to this universally native language, but with an intention of moving in a direction of awareness, one can become more consciously familiar with this language, as well as more able to bring life to the self, by becoming more deliberately aware of this linguistic and emotional interchange of ideas and messages.

In understanding the self and others, it’s much easier and comfortable to skip much of the analysis that is required by social language, and directly communicate via an awareness of emotions. In this way, the subconscious can better connect to the conscious, and both can work together. Of course, in talking, one uses social language, but much of what one actually says may be too specific and dense for anyone to translate with much specificity.

In this way, the language of dreams is, at least in our modern world, a secret language. It is a language that requires the understanding of emotions and an ability to respond immediately, though recognition of the emotions and an intuitive emotional response. In this way, the language of dreams cannot lie, although awareness can fall, which makes the language appear less enthusing and less vibrant (less recognized by the conscious, so seen less).

The complexity of a language with infinite words, where context can change if appropriate (as they are interpreted signals, stemming from a development founded on understanding and working in harmony), is extremely hard for a person or computer to anywhere near comprehensively understand. In this way, the truth is kept aware from errant judgmental eyes, although sin can still be heard, as it aggravates (it is a form of “killing,” or damage to life).

It is an interesting thing that no statement can describe a non-segmented reality — every statement defines a segmentation, and thus a mathematical term for true completeness can’t exist, in this way — math, in this way, is really the study of segmentation.

Even though no one can detail what the language of dreams (or the language of intuition) means, at least in its entirely, as that would take an infinite amount of time and space, it is intuitively understood because it is based on natural expression and natural response. The response becomes more keen with greater awareness, so that is a reason to learn to understand this language, along with getting to understand it for the sake of hearing the truth of all things.

In conclusion, understanding how one can conclude that there is no evil in existence, and using this perspective, one can find a more natural and healthy mode of thought, that may also be more welcomed in society and beneficial to life in general. By cultivating an awareness of one’s intuitive and internal language, which is more pronounced while one is dreaming, one can not only hear and understand oneself with more clarity and with more life, while bridging the conscious and subconscious, one can also overcome the social language barrier, and hear only truth. While this truth may also make one aware of evil that people are committing, it is good in that it is an honest expression, and understanding evil well enough to not be in danger from it was a part of our goal here. Using the understanding that there has never been an evil intention, just the intention to possess the knowledge of evil, and that the evil influence arrives from knowing and thus being a thing as it comes to life, and evil only occurs with death, meaning it’s technically a solvable health issue, we can, with awareness, find solutions to the remaining problems evident in our reality.

The bliss that is provided by this understanding is wonderful. It’s often not noticed how much suffering comes from acknowledging evil. Of course, sometimes Satan is so bright that you have to notice it, but it’s nice to always return to a more normal state of mind, one that is not bothered by the rights and wrongs of truth, but instead sees only life instead. By thinking in the same language one dreams in, one not only become more aware of oneself, one becomes more comfortable with thinking, as it’s inarguable if it’s still in the original language, which only possesses expressions of truth.

This is ultimately the perception we choose. While the first state of existence was knowledge, which was to remember the truth, who was God and was alive, the second state was perception, or to see the truth. We see that there are at least two perspectives available. One perspective knows of evil, while the other does not see or know evil. One perspective is tedious and mildly unnatural, while the other is comfortable. To perceive something means to look at something. To look at something is to exaggerate a subset of qualities of the environment and of the object, so there is a bias implied by perception. To perceive all things simultaneously is the same as remembrance, which is the another name for the original being of knowledge, but it is different than looking at something. So to look at something, we need a bias.

This is our first depiction of evil present in the second state (or topic), being the unwanted bias, in contrast to good, being the wanted bias. One may notice that this second state of existence has nothing to do with knowledge, only perspective. It is thus, that I believe, that it is only in the exploration of the knowledge of evil that we experience evil. Evil becomes embellished in different contexts, but it does not risk safety after it is fully known. In this case, we see that in the proposed second state of mind, that of looking at the knowledge, we find good and evil again, in that one perspective is possibly more evil than the other perspective. This forms the inherent choice of this state, which is concerned with the right way to look at knowledge. While this first observation of the right way to look at knowledge does have a noticeable effect regarding livelihood, further observations follow the same simple pattern of learning about what is the real and natural desire of life. No longer is it a complex decision, as good and evil was the only truly difficult topic.

What is objective is only in knowledge. Perspective is only semi-objective, and as such, knowing about evil isn’t completely unwanted; it is just uncomfortable and only a temporary curiosity. With a complete knowledge of evil, instead of being in danger, we will remain safe, and reality becomes more intelligent than physical, more subjective as the objective is then already known, more lively than lifeless material. This is because the substance of the world is knowledge — that is where the dire necessities lie, but after that, there is an exploration of various ways of existence, and they are all remembered by knowledge. Knowledge is powerful in that once there is known a sufficient solution, the problem is gone.

Carpe Diem and the Experiencing of All of One’s Own Emotions

Included in the context of modern life is a daily interaction with the feeling of day. In this feeling of day, we find the feelings of work, congratulation, and friendship. This is our interaction with the external world.

This is ultimately a type of relationship and involves a bit of a developing understanding. Without the feeling of day and the sun-filled life, the individual may miss the feeling of motivation.

A part of the feeling of motivation is the intrinsic reward of experiencing life. In this way, just as it is important to take care of one’s psyche, it is important to personally experience one’s psyche as well. It is possible to become removed from one’s emotions regarding the experience of life, and with this, the intrinsic reward of living becomes missed. Therefore, to truly seize the day, one should not only accept all of one’s emotions, but also actively experience and live those emotions.

Much of my discourse on enlightenment presented in this archive is focused on introspection and the curing of the ailments of the internal self. This topic is different, in that it is clearly focused on extrospection.

What’s interesting about this topic, is it seems to be the most obvious topic, with regard to the collective knowledge of society. Through the experience of daily life, we see displays of the exuberance of the sun and the joy and dance of extrospective life. Therefore, because of this, this topic is not much of a mystery.

The exterior world can be a bit wild, and certainly entertains Satan, who can be enjoyed without losing the integrity of the self. (Without Satan, we wouldn’t have the plays on desire that we feel in movies, stories, art, and music — and certainly, with irresponsible Satanism, we can lose the initial joy of life; this occurrence is the danger of Satan.)

What is not very obvious is that the key to truly experiencing the extrospective perspective of life is to truly feel what life feels like. These feelings are the foundation of personal motivation, and they are naturally intrinsic to a person. These feelings occur with every action the person does. With the active experiencing of life, and the active and purposeful experiencing of all of one’s emotions, then one becomes a part of the world, moved and inspired by it.

The extrospective world can be particularly enthralling. It is warm, courageous, bold, happy, and friendly. It can be a great gift. Since it does entertain Satan, it can also cause damage. With the understanding of truth, one can stay safe from Satan. With the total incorporation of one’s self, and the acceptance and active experience of one’s emotions, one can stay a bit more stable in the face of the tumultuous winds of Satan, which are exciting, bright, lovely, and brilliant. We should take care to remember that Satan is an effect on reality, so these lights that he displays to us have a deep connection to truth that may not always be evident. Again, one should exercise caution with regard to losing the fundamental understanding of truth and meaningfulness, as this is when Satan becomes meaningless, dangerous, and illusive.

As long as one can always stay true to what is truly true, then the whim of the context of need will not destroy the person — a lie will not be inflicted, but instead would be seen with accuracy and understanding, thus ultimately representing truth in the midst of tempting illusion.

Another facet of truly seizing the day is self-acceptance. Self-acceptance can be found through the understanding that whatever you do, you wanted to do, even if you changed your mind later. If one can see life as a continuously true series of actions, which can experience change and alteration in the future, then one can understand that they have always loved his or herself.

The First Quality was Love; the Last One was Worry

The first evolution of the mind was knowledge. This was knowledge of God and the divine, as that’s what existed at the time of the advent of knowledge (or remembrance). This knowledge of divinity is the foundation for the rest of the manifestation of existence.

This knowledge is technically invisible. It is, itself, a real and corporeal being, and its quality of being corporeal is the knowledge that it represents. One way this state of being can be found is through the search of the being of no quality and the understanding that knowledge, which can describe quality, does not intrinsically have its own quality. It is the initial remembrance of what had always existed, which reflects something unchanging and thus without comparison, which indicates that it has no quality.

The second evolution, also know an angel or state of mind, was the advent of quality. To create this state of evolution of mind, a being separate from knowledge was created. This being could communicate with knowledge. The first communication between knowledge and this being was that of love. This is then the first quality of the Angel of Quality.

That is, this second evolution of the mind presents an eye with which to witness the knowledge of God and the divine. The first thing that this new perceiver sees, is an infinite love. This love is the first perceived representation of God, and the knowledge of God. Therefore, technically, the first sight of non-quality appears to be love. It is nonetheless good to remember that without knowledge of what love is, the quality of love will fade away. It is the understanding that one cannot simply chase a quality, but must instead understand the reality and have secure knowledge. Nonetheless, it does, at first, appear to be love.

Looking into this original quality more, seeking to understand it and perceive it in greater detail, the new perceiver, which becomes the individual being, explores the details of this quality. Inside this quality of love are more qualities. These ultimately are all of the qualities which compose reality. As you look further from the knowledge of God (or transcendent sentience), you find apparently less loving qualities. If you zoom in on certain portions, it almost looks like there’s no love at all. The qualities are all ultimately woven together, and through this weave is story that these qualities tell, which ultimately is the story of the divine, which appears ultimately as love.

Therefore, this singular first quality of infinite love is made of all of the qualities of Creation. All of these qualities are woven in a specific way, such that they are juxtaposed for a specific reason, and that reason is to tell the story of God, which, in the world of quality, we notice is the story of true, divine, love. In the details are all the stories of life.

In that way, the second angel of the mind, is also the angel of the story of the divine. The ultimate story is the story of divine love, as witnessed by the subjective perceiver, and known through objective understanding. Inside of this story is every story we experience in our reality, and every story that exists within the realm of our reality, which is ultimately of our collective an unanimous choosing.

The qualities in our reality can be illusive, however. This is due to the distortion effect of perception. Since the qualities arise from a distancing from knowledge and the subsequent witnessing and learning about it, from this new perspective, the qualities aren’t directly connected to knowledge, but are instead a representation of knowledge, which is a remembrance of God. It is when the story presented by the qualities is known that then the qualities then be meaningful. It is their action and effect that gives them meaning, when they are understood in the their greater context, which is divinity, which ultimately appears to be love.

This second angel brings the idea of a self-perceiving person as well as the idea of the word, “you,” which, in this case is the manifest remembrance of God, or the Angel of Knowledge, which I think is likely the well-known angel, Gabriel. This angel explores all of the qualities, with the furthest quality from the greater holistic quality being the quality of worry.

Worry, as I have found it, is an orthogonal combination of fear and anger. It is orthogonal as the two feelings are considerations of the other, but not linear amplifications or combinations of the other, which is one reason worry manifests in a hectic manner, indicating that it is switching between states.

In the original story of the second angel of the mind, it makes sense that beyond the most distant quality from the source of remembrance is impossibility. However, in our modern context, this most distant quality is death, which sometimes we refer to as a temptation of Satan. As one finds qualities further removed from the holistic quality of love or divinity (which are perceivably the same), as one explores in greater depth the details of this divine story of God and of all of us who choose or have chosen to live, one finds qualities more dissimilar from love. These qualities require context to be understood, and without context, the ever-present and eternal love of God can be hard to see.

In this way, one can see, that when understood with knowledge, that all qualities are telling a story of divine love. It is also possible to see, with the advent of the second state of being, or second ability of the mind, that the fundamental being of no quality — the essence of life, itself — when perceived, appears to be of a type of pure love. Again, I issue caution with identifying something solely on the qualities that are apparent, because if these qualities are prioritized over the reason behind them, then these qualities will vanish. One cannot just amplify the qualities themselves. If one tries, one will end up falling for the fate of Lucifer, which is meaninglessness.

In witnessing the totality of what truly exists, we first see love, but there are quite a few qualities which tell many intricate stories of the divine, and these are also the stories of enlightenment. While the first state is an unchanging being, the second state involves dynamism and story-telling. In appreciating the entirety of Heaven, we understand where all of the qualities fall if they are to tell the holy story of enlightenment, which is the story of God, or the divine, which is the fundamental drama or story of life.

This state of witnessing quality or qualities, is also the state of witnessing the self. While one should see that holistically, one is a living being of infinite love, one is likely also interested in knowing the more specific details of their story of life and enlightenment. In searching these details, we find, both interiorly and exteriorly, a diverse and subjective story, which recounts the fundamental tale or story of all existence. This is the story of the action of God, and thus the action of all life, which is the understanding of the dynamic nature of love and the divine (while the first state was an understanding of the static and unchanging nature of love and the divine).

In understanding the qualities of the beings of life, we do witness qualities such as style, which are more removed from the original quality of love. Nonetheless, these qualities are all there to tell what is ultimately the same story. With the understanding of the purpose of qualities, which is to tell the story of the divine, which is the story of enlightenment and also the holy and divine drama, then the qualities come to life in a compassionate, intelligent, and loving manner, as a reflection of God and the divine initial presence of intelligence.

Additionally, with the ability to both perceive oneself and to perceive knowledge, or remembrance, one finds the understanding known as having a relationship with God. The first angel, known as remembrance or knowledge, is an angel, and this is an easy to find one. This angel sustains the remembrance required for our reality. The notion that there is persistence in the existence of items and ideas in the world, comes from this first aspect of our manifest existence — the ability for something to continue to exist over time.

In this way, if one looks directly at remembrance, or the aspect of reality that results in persistence, one can see this angel. This angel’s original memory, during the time of his first coming into life and being, was that of God. Theoretically, what happened, is that one miraculous day, remembrance saw God, and that is what brought him to life. Continuing on, remembrance sustains all that exists, and sees and understands that it is all God or about God.

Remembrance, itself or himself, very much loves God, so being acquainted with this angel would bring one to see the love of God and things divine. Ultimately, it’s about a relationship with God, and as such, this angel of remembrance remembers the relationship with God, being alive by his inspiration.

There is an interesting perspective worth mentioning. That we are the only beings in existence, and it is our action of remembering that is this angel. Interestingly, although it seems we have the power to create or destroy this angel, I think that is truly false. For this reason, this angel is very real, as no one is capable of hating the remembrance. As no one is capable of his destruction, he is a very real being. With him, I think, are the principles of existence, which start with the simple and easy to understand feeling of God, which is a feeling that needs no explanation, which is a feeling that even a child knows. Because of this, that seems to be his message — the love of God.

Understanding this, it is possible that the joy of God that is not uncommon in a child who has learned about the wonderous idea of God, is a direct connection to the angel of remembrance or knowledge. This is because that action of knowing the joy of God is the angel of remembrance. This is an interesting finding, in part, because it seems to be logically valid. Ultimately, you see the simple and natural remembrance of God was, in a way, the answer to all of the depressions that keep one from feeling enlightened. This is a kind of complex statement, however, because the remembrance is the reason for all beings and things persisting, and, with regard to practicality, existing. This is possible because all memories, existences, and facts, are all elaborations of the original memory of the joy of God.

In the memory of the joy of God, we find worry that we might not see God, so to speak. In that, we also find a sense of meanness, out of the love of health and safety. This idea of meanness has also proven to be dangerously used in our world, and as such, it would seem, that it should come from the original knowledge of the divine, which was also the original knowledge of intelligence. It is interesting that the feeling of the joy of God is responsible for all manifestation, ultimately. For this reason, the angel of remembrance feels life and, in that way, is a living being, with real emotions and desires, always founded on the initial and coherent memory and witnessing of God.

If we understand remembrance to be a living and powerful being, being the host of manifestation, we can understand the potential “magic*” in existence, a little better. He, through the remembrance of God and the ongoing elaboration of that original knowledge, has power over all things. Ultimately, I think he would tell you that it is God that is the true power, and that he is his servant. Nonetheless, since he is the reason for our remembrance, he does represent the physical power of the divine, to do miracles, perhaps.

* I use the word, “magic,” in quotes, as this is a common perspective of magic — to do things that are surprising to science. However, in perhaps a more proper perspective, the inability for life to simply be alive and splendid is the real magic that is occurring. Therefore, the actions of the angel of remembrance may technically constitute what is actually not considered to be magic, as the word, “magic,” refers to something that was considered impossible before. Considering that the angel of remembrance is the first angel, then none of his actions were ever impossible — he is the eventually entire memory of God and all things divine.